Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU)
Samsung Exynos 2200
Seleziona la scheda video 1
Seleziona la scheda video 2

Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU) contro Samsung Exynos 2200. Specifiche, prestazioni, test

Punteggio complessivo
star star star star star
Rilasciato
Q1/2022
Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU)
Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU)
Rilasciato
Q1/2022
Punteggio complessivo
star star star star star
Samsung Exynos 2200
Samsung Exynos 2200

Confronta Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU) VS Samsung Exynos 2200. Which processor delivers superior performance?

In this detailed comparison, we evaluate the specifications and benchmarks of both processors to determine the best choice for your needs. We analyze their core counts, maximum frequencies, and power consumption.

Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU) boasts a maximum frequency of 3.20 GHz GHz. 20 / 20 cores that enhance multitasking capabilities.With a power consumption of 60 W W, it ensures efficient performance.Rilasciato in Q1/2022, it incorporates the latest technology for optimal efficiency.

Samsung Exynos 2200 features a maximum frequency of 2.80 GHz GHz. 8 / 8 cores designed for high-performance tasks.Launched in Q1/2022, it is built to handle demanding applications.

Differenze

  • Posizione nella classifica generale

    (sulla base di diversi parametri di riferimento)

    18 left arrow score
  • Velocità di clock più alta

    Intorno a 13% migliore velocità di clock

    3.20 GHz left arrow 2.80 GHz
  • Più numero di core

    12 Più core

    20 left arrow 8

Posizioni in tutte le classifiche

Posizioni comuni Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU) CPU in benchmark popolari, per un confronto con altri modelli.

  • Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
    106 place
  • Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
    44 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    96 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    29 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    3 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    56 place
  • Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
    3 place
  • Posizione nella classifica generale

    (sulla base di diversi parametri di riferimento)

    569 left arrow score

Posizioni in tutte le classifiche

Posizioni comuni Samsung Exynos 2200 CPU in benchmark popolari, per un confronto con altri modelli.

  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    365 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    665 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    222 place
  • AnTuTu 9 Benchmark
    6 place

Specifiche

Dati tecnici
Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU) Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU)
Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 2200
Famiglia e gruppo di CPU

Comprehensive background on the processors being compared, detailing their series, generation, and targeted market segment.

  • Serie
    Apple M series left arrow Samsung Exynos
  • Gruppo CPU
    Apple M1 left arrow Samsung Exynos 2200
  • Segmento
    Mobile left arrow Mobile
  • Generazione
    1 left arrow 6
  • Modello passato
    -- left arrow Samsung Exynos 2100
Specifiche tecniche della CPU

Essential parameters including the number of cores, threads, base and turbo frequencies, and cache size. These metrics provide insight into the processor’s speed—higher values generally indicate better performance.

  • CPU Cores / Threads
    20 / 20 left arrow 8 / 8
  • Architettura di base
    hybrid (big.LITTLE) left arrow hybrid (Prime / big.LITTLE)
  • A-Core
    16x Firestorm left arrow 1x Cortex-X2
  • B-Core
    4x Icestorm left arrow 3x Cortex-A710
  • Hyperthreading / SMT
    No left arrow No
  • Overclock
    No left arrow No
  • A-Core Frequency
    3.20 GHz left arrow 2.80 GHz
  • B-Core Frequency
    2.06 GHz left arrow 2.52 GHz
IGPU

The integrated graphics (iGPU) do not influence the CPU performance significantly; they serve as a substitute for a dedicated graphics card in the absence of one or are utilized in mobile devices.

  • Nome della GPU
    Apple M1 Ultra (64 Core) left arrow Samsung Xclipse 920 (RDNA 2)
  • GPU frequency
    1.30 GHz left arrow 1.30 GHz
  • GPU (Turbo)
    No turbo left arrow 1.30 GHz
  • Unità di esecuzione
    1024 left arrow 24
  • Shader
    8192 left arrow 384
  • Max. GPU Memory
    64 GB left arrow 4 GB
  • Max. displays
    3 left arrow 0
  • Generazione
    1 left arrow 1
  • Direct X
    -- left arrow 12
  • Processo tecnico
    5 nm left arrow 4 nm
  • Data di rilascio
    Q1/2022 left arrow Q1/2022
Supporto codec hardware

This section details the built-in codecs used for encoding and decoding media content, which significantly enhance processing speed and efficiency.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP8
    Decode left arrow No
  • VP9
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • AV1
    No left arrow Decode
  • AVC
    Decode left arrow No
  • VC-1
    Decode left arrow No
  • JPEG
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
Specifiche di memoria e PCI

Overview of the types and quantities of RAM supported by Samsung Exynos 2200 e Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU). The supported memory frequencies may vary depending on the motherboard configuration.

  • Tipo di memoria
    LPDDR5-6400 left arrow LPDDR5-6400
  • Max. Memoria
    128 GB left arrow 12 GB
  • Canali di memoria
    8 (Octa Channel) left arrow 4
  • Bandwidth
    819.2 GB/s left arrow 51.2 GB/s
  • ECC
    No left arrow No
  • PCIe
    4.0 left arrow
  • AES-NI
    left arrow No
Consumo di energia

Analyze the TDP (Thermal Design Power) requirements of Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU) e Samsung Exynos 2200 to make an informed decision on the appropriate cooling system. Remember that TDP refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.

  • TDP (PL1)
    60 W left arrow
  • TDP up
    120 W left arrow --
Tecnologie ed estensioni

Information on architecture, interfaces, and additional instructions supported by Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU) e Samsung Exynos 2200, including virtual machine technologies and fabrication processes.

  • Processo tecnico
    5 nm left arrow 4 nm
  • Presa
    N/A left arrow N/A
  • L2-Cache
    52.00 MB left arrow --
  • Architettura
    M1 left arrow Cortex-X2/-A710/-A510
  • Operating systems
    macOS left arrow Android
  • Virtualizzazione
    Apple Virtualization Framework left arrow None
  • Set di istruzioni (ISA)
    ARMv8-A64 (64 bit) left arrow ARMv9-A64 (64 bit)
  • Estensioni ISA
    Rosetta 2 x86-Emulation left arrow
  • Data di rilascio
    Q1/2022 left arrow Q1/2022
  • Part Number
    -- left arrow SM-S908B

Benchmark (test)

Test di performance CPUs

By analyzing the results from various benchmarks, you can gain a clearer understanding of the performance differences between Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU) e Samsung Exynos 2200.

Compare the synthetic benchmark scores and make an informed decision on the best processor for your needs!

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 SC è un popolare test di prestazioni multipiattaforma per processori desktop o mobili che utilizza intensamente la memoria di sistema.
1793
Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU)
1186
Samsung Exynos 2200
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 MC è un popolare test di prestazioni multipiattaforma per processori desktop o mobili che utilizza intensamente la memoria di sistema.
24055
Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU)
3586
Samsung Exynos 2200
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
Le prestazioni della iGPU - la GPU interna nei giochi.
21200
Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU)
1422
Samsung Exynos 2200

Ultimi confronti