Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU)
Samsung Exynos 2200
Sélectionnez la carte vidéo 1
Sélectionnez la carte vidéo 2

Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU) contre Samsung Exynos 2200. Spécifications, performances, tests

Note globale
star star star star star
Libéré
Q1/2022
Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU)
Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU)
Libéré
Q1/2022
Note globale
star star star star star
Samsung Exynos 2200
Samsung Exynos 2200

Comparez Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU) VS Samsung Exynos 2200. Which processor delivers superior performance?

In this detailed comparison, we evaluate the specifications and benchmarks of both processors to determine the best choice for your needs. We analyze their core counts, maximum frequencies, and power consumption.

Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU) boasts a maximum frequency of 3.20 GHz GHz. 20 / 20 cores that enhance multitasking capabilities.With a power consumption of 60 W W, it ensures efficient performance.Sorti en Q1/2022, it incorporates the latest technology for optimal efficiency.

Samsung Exynos 2200 features a maximum frequency of 2.80 GHz GHz. 8 / 8 cores designed for high-performance tasks.Launched in Q1/2022, it is built to handle demanding applications.

Differences

  • Place dans le classement général

    (sur la base de plusieurs critères de référence)

    18 left arrow score
  • Vitesse d'horloge plus élevée

    Autour de 13% une meilleure vitesse d'horloge

    3.20 GHz left arrow 2.80 GHz
  • Plus grand nombre de cœurs

    12 Plus de cœurs

    20 left arrow 8

Positions dans tous les classements

Positions communes Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU) CPU dans des benchmarks populaires, pour comparaison avec d'autres modèles.

  • Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
    106 place
  • Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
    44 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    96 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    29 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    3 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    56 place
  • Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
    3 place
  • Place dans le classement général

    (sur la base de plusieurs critères de référence)

    569 left arrow score

Positions dans tous les classements

Positions communes Samsung Exynos 2200 CPU dans des benchmarks populaires, pour comparaison avec d'autres modèles.

  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    365 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    665 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    222 place
  • AnTuTu 9 Benchmark
    6 place

Spécifications

Données techniques
Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU) Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU)
Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 2200
CPU famille et groupe

Comprehensive background on the processors being compared, detailing their series, generation, and targeted market segment.

  • Série
    Apple M series left arrow Samsung Exynos
  • Groupe de CPU
    Apple M1 left arrow Samsung Exynos 2200
  • Segment
    Mobile left arrow Mobile
  • Génération
    1 left arrow 6
  • Modèle précédent
    -- left arrow Samsung Exynos 2100
Caractéristiques techniques du CPU

Essential parameters including the number of cores, threads, base and turbo frequencies, and cache size. These metrics provide insight into the processor’s speed—higher values generally indicate better performance.

  • CPU Cores / Threads
    20 / 20 left arrow 8 / 8
  • Architecture de base
    hybrid (big.LITTLE) left arrow hybrid (Prime / big.LITTLE)
  • A-Core
    16x Firestorm left arrow 1x Cortex-X2
  • B-Core
    4x Icestorm left arrow 3x Cortex-A710
  • Hyperthreading / SMT
    Non left arrow Non
  • Overclocking
    Non left arrow Non
  • A-Core Frequency
    3.20 GHz left arrow 2.80 GHz
  • B-Core Frequency
    2.06 GHz left arrow 2.52 GHz
IGPU

The integrated graphics (iGPU) do not influence the CPU performance significantly; they serve as a substitute for a dedicated graphics card in the absence of one or are utilized in mobile devices.

  • Nom du GPU
    Apple M1 Ultra (64 Core) left arrow Samsung Xclipse 920 (RDNA 2)
  • GPU frequency
    1.30 GHz left arrow 1.30 GHz
  • GPU (Turbo)
    Pas de turbo left arrow 1.30 GHz
  • Unités d'exécution
    1024 left arrow 24
  • Shader
    8192 left arrow 384
  • Max. GPU Memory
    64 GB left arrow 4 GB
  • Max. displays
    3 left arrow Geekbench 5 SC is a popular cross-platform performance test for desktnt la mémoire du système.
  • Génération
    1 left arrow 1
  • Direct X
    -- left arrow 12
  • Processus technologique
    5 nm left arrow 4 nm
  • Date de sortie
    Q1/2022 left arrow Q1/2022
Prise en charge des codecs matériels

This section details the built-in codecs used for encoding and decoding media content, which significantly enhance processing speed and efficiency.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP8
    Decode left arrow Non
  • VP9
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • AV1
    Non left arrow Decode
  • AVC
    Decode left arrow Non
  • VC-1
    Decode left arrow Non
  • JPEG
    Decode / Encode left arrow Non
Spécifications de la mémoire et PCI

Overview of the types and quantities of RAM supported by Samsung Exynos 2200 et Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU). The supported memory frequencies may vary depending on the motherboard configuration.

  • Type de mémoire
    LPDDR5-6400 left arrow LPDDR5-6400
  • Max. Mémoire
    128 GB left arrow 12 GB
  • Canaux de mémoire
    8 (Octa Channel) left arrow 4
  • Bandwidth
    819.2 GB/s left arrow 51.2 GB/s
  • ECC
    Non left arrow Non
  • PCIe
    4.0 left arrow
  • AES-NI
    Oui left arrow Non
Consommation d'énergie

Analyze the TDP (Thermal Design Power) requirements of Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU) et Samsung Exynos 2200 to make an informed decision on the appropriate cooling system. Remember that TDP refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.

  • TDP (PL1)
    60 W left arrow
  • TDP up
    120 W left arrow --
Technologies et extensions

Information on architecture, interfaces, and additional instructions supported by Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU) et Samsung Exynos 2200, including virtual machine technologies and fabrication processes.

  • Processus technologique
    5 nm left arrow 4 nm
  • Socket
    N/A left arrow N/A
  • L2-Cache
    52.00 MB left arrow --
  • Architecture
    M1 left arrow Cortex-X2/-A710/-A510
  • Operating systems
    macOS left arrow Android
  • Virtualization
    Apple Virtualization Framework left arrow None
  • Jeu d'instructions (ISA)
    ARMv8-A64 (64 bit) left arrow ARMv9-A64 (64 bit)
  • Extensions ISA
    Rosetta 2 x86-Emulation left arrow
  • Date de sortie
    Q1/2022 left arrow Q1/2022
  • Part Number
    -- left arrow SM-S908B

Benchmarks

Tests de performance CPUs

By analyzing the results from various benchmarks, you can gain a clearer understanding of the performance differences between Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU) et Samsung Exynos 2200.

Compare the synthetic benchmark scores and make an informed decision on the best processor for your needs!

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 SC is a popular cross-platform performance test for desktop or mobile processors that uses system memory intensively
1793
Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU)
1186
Samsung Exynos 2200
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 MC is a popular cross-platform performance test for desktop or mobile processors that uses system memory intensively
24055
Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU)
3586
Samsung Exynos 2200
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
Les performances de l'iGPU - le GPU interne dans les jeux.
21200
Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU)
1422
Samsung Exynos 2200

Dernières comparaisons