Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU)
Samsung Exynos 2200
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU) vs Samsung Exynos 2200. Specifications, performance, tests

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q1/2022
Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU)
Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU)
Released
Q1/2022
Overall score
star star star star star
Samsung Exynos 2200
Samsung Exynos 2200

Compare Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU) VS Samsung Exynos 2200. Which processor delivers superior performance?

In this detailed comparison, we evaluate the specifications and benchmarks of both processors to determine the best choice for your needs. We analyze their core counts, maximum frequencies, and power consumption.

Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU) boasts a maximum frequency of 3.20 GHz GHz. 20 / 20 cores that enhance multitasking capabilities.With a power consumption of 60 W W, it ensures efficient performance.Released in Q1/2022, it incorporates the latest technology for optimal efficiency.

Samsung Exynos 2200 features a maximum frequency of 2.80 GHz GHz. 8 / 8 cores designed for high-performance tasks.Launched in Q1/2022, it is built to handle demanding applications.

Differences

  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    18 left arrow score
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 13% better clock speed

    3.20 GHz left arrow 2.80 GHz
  • More number of cores

    12 times more cores

    20 left arrow 8

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU) CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
    106 place
  • Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
    44 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    96 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    29 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    3 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    56 place
  • Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
    3 place
  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    569 left arrow score

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Samsung Exynos 2200 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    365 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    665 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    222 place
  • AnTuTu 9 Benchmark
    6 place

Specifications

Technical data
Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU) Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU)
Samsung Exynos 2200 Samsung Exynos 2200
CPU family and group

Comprehensive background on the processors being compared, detailing their series, generation, and targeted market segment.

  • Family
    Apple M series left arrow Samsung Exynos
  • CPU group
    Apple M1 left arrow Samsung Exynos 2200
  • Segment
    Mobile left arrow Mobile
  • Generation
    1 left arrow 6
  • Predecessor
    -- left arrow Samsung Exynos 2100
CPU Technical specs

Essential parameters including the number of cores, threads, base and turbo frequencies, and cache size. These metrics provide insight into the processor’s speed—higher values generally indicate better performance.

  • CPU Cores / Threads
    20 / 20 left arrow 8 / 8
  • Core architecture
    hybrid (big.LITTLE) left arrow hybrid (Prime / big.LITTLE)
  • A-Core
    16x Firestorm left arrow 1x Cortex-X2
  • B-Core
    4x Icestorm left arrow 3x Cortex-A710
  • Hyperthreading / SMT
    No left arrow No
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow No
  • A-Core Frequency
    3.20 GHz left arrow 2.80 GHz
  • B-Core Frequency
    2.06 GHz left arrow 2.52 GHz
IGPU

The integrated graphics (iGPU) do not influence the CPU performance significantly; they serve as a substitute for a dedicated graphics card in the absence of one or are utilized in mobile devices.

  • GPU name
    Apple M1 Ultra (64 Core) left arrow Samsung Xclipse 920 (RDNA 2)
  • GPU frequency
    1.30 GHz left arrow 1.30 GHz
  • GPU (Turbo)
    No turbo left arrow 1.30 GHz
  • Execution units
    1024 left arrow 24
  • Shader
    8192 left arrow 384
  • Max. GPU Memory
    64 GB left arrow 4 GB
  • Max. displays
    3 left arrow 0
  • Generation
    1 left arrow 1
  • Direct X
    -- left arrow 12
  • Technology
    5 nm left arrow 4 nm
  • Release date
    Q1/2022 left arrow Q1/2022
Hardware codec support

This section details the built-in codecs used for encoding and decoding media content, which significantly enhance processing speed and efficiency.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP8
    Decode left arrow No
  • VP9
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • AV1
    No left arrow Decode
  • AVC
    Decode left arrow No
  • VC-1
    Decode left arrow No
  • JPEG
    Decode / Encode left arrow No
Memory specs & PCI

Overview of the types and quantities of RAM supported by Samsung Exynos 2200 and Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU). The supported memory frequencies may vary depending on the motherboard configuration.

  • Memory type
    LPDDR5-6400 left arrow LPDDR5-6400
  • Max. Memory
    128 GB left arrow 12 GB
  • Memory channels
    8 (Octa Channel) left arrow 4
  • Bandwidth
    819.2 GB/s left arrow 51.2 GB/s
  • ECC
    No left arrow No
  • PCIe
    4.0 left arrow
  • AES-NI
    Yes left arrow No
Thermal Management

Analyze the TDP (Thermal Design Power) requirements of Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU) and Samsung Exynos 2200 to make an informed decision on the appropriate cooling system. Remember that TDP refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.

  • TDP (PL1)
    60 W left arrow
  • TDP up
    120 W left arrow --
Technologies and extensions

Information on architecture, interfaces, and additional instructions supported by Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU) and Samsung Exynos 2200, including virtual machine technologies and fabrication processes.

  • Technology
    5 nm left arrow 4 nm
  • Socket
    N/A left arrow N/A
  • L2-Cache
    52.00 MB left arrow --
  • Architecture
    M1 left arrow Cortex-X2/-A710/-A510
  • Operating systems
    macOS left arrow Android
  • Virtualization
    Apple Virtualization Framework left arrow None
  • Instruction set (ISA)
    ARMv8-A64 (64 bit) left arrow ARMv9-A64 (64 bit)
  • ISA extensions
    Rosetta 2 x86-Emulation left arrow
  • Release date
    Q1/2022 left arrow Q1/2022
  • Part Number
    -- left arrow SM-S908B

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

By analyzing the results from various benchmarks, you can gain a clearer understanding of the performance differences between Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU) and Samsung Exynos 2200.

Compare the synthetic benchmark scores and make an informed decision on the best processor for your needs!

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 SC is a popular cross-platform performance test for desktop or mobile processors that uses system memory intensively
1793
Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU)
1186
Samsung Exynos 2200
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 MC is a popular cross-platform performance test for desktop or mobile processors that uses system memory intensively
24055
Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU)
3586
Samsung Exynos 2200
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The performance of the iGPU - the internal GPU in games
21200
Apple M1 Ultra (64-GPU)
1422
Samsung Exynos 2200

Latest comparisons