Porównaj AMD EPYC 9654 VS Baikal-S. Which processor delivers superior performance?
In this detailed comparison, we evaluate the specifications and benchmarks of both processors to determine the best choice for your needs. We analyze their core counts, maximum frequencies, and power consumption.
AMD EPYC 9654 boasts a maximum frequency of 2.40 GHz GHz. 96 / 192 cores that enhance multitasking capabilities.With a power consumption of 360 W W, it ensures efficient performance.Wydany w Q4/2022, it incorporates the latest technology for optimal efficiency.
Baikal-S features a maximum frequency of 2.2 GHz GHz. 48 cores designed for high-performance tasks.Its power consumption is 120 W W, providing a balance of power and efficiency.Launched in Q1/2022, it is built to handle demanding applications.
Powody do rozważenia Miejsce w rankingu ogólnym
(w oparciu o kilka benchmarków)
score
Wyższa prędkość zegara
Wokół 8% lepsza prędkość zegara
2.2 GHz
Większa liczba rdzeni
48 Więcej rdzeni
48
Wspólne stanowiska AMD EPYC 9654 Procesor w popularnych benchmarkach, dla porównania z innymi modelami.
Powody do rozważenia Wydajność na wat
About 0.33 mniej ciepła wytwarzanego przez procesor, W.
360 W
Wspólne stanowiska Baikal-S Procesor w popularnych benchmarkach, dla porównania z innymi modelami.
AMD EPYC 9654
Comprehensive background on the processors being compared, detailing their series, generation, and targeted market segment.
Baikal
Baikal-S
Server
Essential parameters including the number of cores, threads, base and turbo frequencies, and cache size. These metrics provide insight into the processor’s speed—higher values generally indicate better performance.
2.2 GHz
Overview of the types and quantities of RAM supported by Baikal-S oraz AMD EPYC 9654. The supported memory frequencies may vary depending on the motherboard configuration.
DDR43-3200
768
6
Tak
4
Analyze the TDP (Thermal Design Power) requirements of AMD EPYC 9654 oraz Baikal-S to make an informed decision on the appropriate cooling system. Remember that TDP refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.
120 W
Information on architecture, interfaces, and additional instructions supported by AMD EPYC 9654 oraz Baikal-S, including virtual machine technologies and fabrication processes.
16 nm
FCLGA-3467
512 KB
2 MB
CortexA75
Q1/2022
By analyzing the results from various benchmarks, you can gain a clearer understanding of the performance differences between AMD EPYC 9654 oraz Baikal-S.
Compare the synthetic benchmark scores and make an informed decision on the best processor for your needs!
English
Russian
German
Portuguese
Italian
French
Japan
Spanish
Chinese
Korean
