AMD EPYC 9654
Baikal-S
Sélectionnez la carte vidéo 1
Sélectionnez la carte vidéo 2

AMD EPYC 9654 contre Baikal-S. Spécifications, performances, tests

Note globale
star star star star star
Libéré
Q4/2022
AMD EPYC 9654
AMD EPYC 9654
Libéré
Q1/2022
Note globale
star star star star star
Baikal-S
Baikal-S

Comparez AMD EPYC 9654 VS Baikal-S. Which processor delivers superior performance?

In this detailed comparison, we evaluate the specifications and benchmarks of both processors to determine the best choice for your needs. We analyze their core counts, maximum frequencies, and power consumption.

AMD EPYC 9654 boasts a maximum frequency of 2.40 GHz GHz. 96 / 192 cores that enhance multitasking capabilities.With a power consumption of 360 W W, it ensures efficient performance.Sorti en Q4/2022, it incorporates the latest technology for optimal efficiency.

Baikal-S features a maximum frequency of 2.2 GHz GHz. 48 cores designed for high-performance tasks.Its power consumption is 120 W W, providing a balance of power and efficiency.Launched in Q1/2022, it is built to handle demanding applications.

Differences

AMD EPYC 9654 Raisons de considérer
AMD EPYC 9654
Signaler un bogue
  • Place dans le classement général

    (sur la base de plusieurs critères de référence)

    77 left arrow score
  • Vitesse d'horloge plus élevée

    Autour de 8% une meilleure vitesse d'horloge

    2.40 GHz left arrow 2.2 GHz
  • Plus grand nombre de cœurs

    48 Plus de cœurs

    96 left arrow 48

Positions dans tous les classements

Positions communes AMD EPYC 9654 CPU dans des benchmarks populaires, pour comparaison avec d'autres modèles.

  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    212 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    2 place
  • Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
    149 place
  • Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
    6 place
Baikal-S Raisons de considérer
Baikal-S
Signaler un bogue
  • Performance par watt

    About 0.33 moins de chaleur générée par le processeur, W.

    120 W left arrow 360 W

Positions dans tous les classements

Positions communes Baikal-S CPU dans des benchmarks populaires, pour comparaison avec d'autres modèles.

  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    124 place
  • CoreMark
    1 place

Spécifications

Données techniques
AMD EPYC 9654 AMD EPYC 9654
Baikal-S Baikal-S
CPU famille et groupe

Comprehensive background on the processors being compared, detailing their series, generation, and targeted market segment.

  • Série
    AMD EPYC left arrow Baikal
  • Groupe de CPU
    AMD EPYC 9004 left arrow Baikal-S
  • Segment
    Desktop / Server left arrow Server
Caractéristiques techniques du CPU

Essential parameters including the number of cores, threads, base and turbo frequencies, and cache size. These metrics provide insight into the processor’s speed—higher values generally indicate better performance.

  • Fréquence
    2.40 GHz left arrow 2.2 GHz
Spécifications de la mémoire et PCI

Overview of the types and quantities of RAM supported by Baikal-S et AMD EPYC 9654. The supported memory frequencies may vary depending on the motherboard configuration.

  • Type de mémoire
    DDR5-4800 left arrow DDR43-3200
  • Max. Mémoire
    6144 GB left arrow 768
  • Canaux de mémoire
    12 left arrow 6
  • ECC
    Oui left arrow Oui
  • PCIe
    5.0 x 128 left arrow 4
Consommation d'énergie

Analyze the TDP (Thermal Design Power) requirements of AMD EPYC 9654 et Baikal-S to make an informed decision on the appropriate cooling system. Remember that TDP refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.

  • TDP (PL1)
    360 W left arrow 120 W
Technologies et extensions

Information on architecture, interfaces, and additional instructions supported by AMD EPYC 9654 et Baikal-S, including virtual machine technologies and fabrication processes.

  • Processus technologique
    5 nm left arrow 16 nm
  • Socket
    SP5 left arrow FCLGA-3467
  • L2-Cache
    96.00 MB left arrow 512 KB
  • L3-Cache
    384.00 MB left arrow 2 MB
  • Architecture
    Genoa (Zen 4) left arrow CortexA75
  • Date de sortie
    Q4/2022 left arrow Q1/2022

Benchmarks

Tests de performance CPUs

By analyzing the results from various benchmarks, you can gain a clearer understanding of the performance differences between AMD EPYC 9654 et Baikal-S.

Compare the synthetic benchmark scores and make an informed decision on the best processor for your needs!

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 MC is a popular cross-platform performance test for desktop or mobile processors that uses system memory intensively
68024
AMD EPYC 9654
13671
Baikal-S

Dernières comparaisons