Compare AMD EPYC 9654 VS Baikal-S. Which processor delivers superior performance?
In this detailed comparison, we evaluate the specifications and benchmarks of both processors to determine the best choice for your needs. We analyze their core counts, maximum frequencies, and power consumption.
AMD EPYC 9654 boasts a maximum frequency of 2.40 GHz GHz. 96 / 192 cores that enhance multitasking capabilities.With a power consumption of 360 W W, it ensures efficient performance.Released in Q4/2022, it incorporates the latest technology for optimal efficiency.
Baikal-S features a maximum frequency of 2.2 GHz GHz. 48 cores designed for high-performance tasks.Its power consumption is 120 W W, providing a balance of power and efficiency.Launched in Q1/2022, it is built to handle demanding applications.
Reasons to consider Place in the overall ranking
(based on several benchmarks)
score
Higher clock speed
Around 8% better clock speed
2.2 GHz
More number of cores
48 times more cores
48
Common positions AMD EPYC 9654 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.
Reasons to consider Performance per watt
About 0.33 times less performance per watt
360 W
Common positions Baikal-S CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.
AMD EPYC 9654
Comprehensive background on the processors being compared, detailing their series, generation, and targeted market segment.
Baikal
Baikal-S
Server
Essential parameters including the number of cores, threads, base and turbo frequencies, and cache size. These metrics provide insight into the processor’s speed—higher values generally indicate better performance.
2.2 GHz
Overview of the types and quantities of RAM supported by Baikal-S and AMD EPYC 9654. The supported memory frequencies may vary depending on the motherboard configuration.
DDR43-3200
768
6
Yes
4
Analyze the TDP (Thermal Design Power) requirements of AMD EPYC 9654 and Baikal-S to make an informed decision on the appropriate cooling system. Remember that TDP refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.
120 W
Information on architecture, interfaces, and additional instructions supported by AMD EPYC 9654 and Baikal-S, including virtual machine technologies and fabrication processes.
16 nm
FCLGA-3467
512 KB
2 MB
CortexA75
Q1/2022
By analyzing the results from various benchmarks, you can gain a clearer understanding of the performance differences between AMD EPYC 9654 and Baikal-S.
Compare the synthetic benchmark scores and make an informed decision on the best processor for your needs!
Russian
German
Portuguese
Italian
French
Japan
Spanish
Polish
Chinese
Korean
