Porównaj Baikal-S VS Elbrus-2000. Which processor delivers superior performance?
In this detailed comparison, we evaluate the specifications and benchmarks of both processors to determine the best choice for your needs. We analyze their core counts, maximum frequencies, and power consumption.
Baikal-S boasts a maximum frequency of 2.2 GHz GHz. 48 cores that enhance multitasking capabilities.With a power consumption of 120 W W, it ensures efficient performance.Wydany w Q1/2022, it incorporates the latest technology for optimal efficiency.
Elbrus-2000 features a maximum frequency of 0.3 GHz GHz. 1 cores designed for high-performance tasks.Its power consumption is 6 W W, providing a balance of power and efficiency.Launched in Q2/2005, it is built to handle demanding applications.
Powody do rozważenia Wyższa prędkość zegara
Wokół 86% lepsza prędkość zegara
0.3 GHz
Większa liczba rdzeni
47 Więcej rdzeni
1
Wspólne stanowiska Baikal-S Procesor w popularnych benchmarkach, dla porównania z innymi modelami.
Powody do rozważenia Wydajność na wat
About 0.05 mniej ciepła wytwarzanego przez procesor, W.
120 W
Wspólne stanowiska Elbrus-2000 Procesor w popularnych benchmarkach, dla porównania z innymi modelami.
No data
Baikal-S
Comprehensive background on the processors being compared, detailing their series, generation, and targeted market segment.
Desktop
Elbrus
Elbrus-1
Essential parameters including the number of cores, threads, base and turbo frequencies, and cache size. These metrics provide insight into the processor’s speed—higher values generally indicate better performance.
0.3 GHz
1
1
By analyzing the results from various benchmarks, you can gain a clearer understanding of the performance differences between Baikal-S oraz Elbrus-2000.
Compare the synthetic benchmark scores and make an informed decision on the best processor for your needs!
English
Russian
German
Portuguese
Italian
French
Japan
Spanish
Chinese
Korean
