비교 AMD A4-6320 VS AMD FX-8100. Which processor delivers superior performance?
In this detailed comparison, we evaluate the specifications and benchmarks of both processors to determine the best choice for your needs. We analyze their core counts, maximum frequencies, and power consumption.
AMD A4-6320 boasts a maximum frequency of 3.80 GHz GHz. 2 cores that enhance multitasking capabilities.With a power consumption of 65 W W, it ensures efficient performance.에 출시 Q1/2014, it incorporates the latest technology for optimal efficiency.
AMD FX-8100 features a maximum frequency of 2.80 GHz GHz. 8 cores designed for high-performance tasks.Its power consumption is 95 W W, providing a balance of power and efficiency.Launched in Q4/2011, it is built to handle demanding applications.
고려해야 하는 이유 전체 랭킹 순위
(여러 벤치마크 기준)
score
더 빠른 클럭 속도
주변 26% 더 나은 클럭 속도
2.80 GHz
더 빠른 터보 클럭 속도
주변 8% 더 나은 오버클럭 클럭 속도
3.70 GHz
와트당 성능
와트당 성능 몇 배 감소
95 W
공통 위치 AMD A4-6320 다른 모델과의 비교를 위한 인기 벤치마크의 CPU.
고려해야 하는 이유 전체 랭킹 순위
(여러 벤치마크 기준)
score
더 많은 코어 수
정a보 4 몇 배 더 많은 코어
2
공통 위치 AMD FX-8100 다른 모델과의 비교를 위한 인기 벤치마크의 CPU.
AMD A4-6320
Comprehensive background on the processors being compared, detailing their series, generation, and targeted market segment.
Desktop / Server
AMD FX
2
AMD FX-8000
Essential parameters including the number of cores, threads, base and turbo frequencies, and cache size. These metrics provide insight into the processor’s speed—higher values generally indicate better performance.
2.80 GHz
8
3.70 GHz
8
아니요
예
normal
The integrated graphics (iGPU) do not influence the CPU performance significantly; they serve as a substitute for a dedicated graphics card in the absence of one or are utilized in mobile devices.
iGPU 없음
터보 없음
--
This section details the built-in codecs used for encoding and decoding media content, which significantly enhance processing speed and efficiency.
아니요
아니요
아니요
아니요
아니요
아니요
아니요
아니요
아니요
Overview of the types and quantities of RAM supported by AMD FX-8100 그리고 AMD A4-6320. The supported memory frequencies may vary depending on the motherboard configuration.
DDR3-1866
예
2
예
Analyze the TDP (Thermal Design Power) requirements of AMD A4-6320 그리고 AMD FX-8100 to make an informed decision on the appropriate cooling system. Remember that TDP refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.
95 W
Information on architecture, interfaces, and additional instructions supported by AMD A4-6320 그리고 AMD FX-8100, including virtual machine technologies and fabrication processes.
x86-64 (64 bit)
AMD-V
SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, FMA3, FMA4
8.00 MB
Vishera (Bulldozer)
32 nm
AM3+
Q4/2011
By analyzing the results from various benchmarks, you can gain a clearer understanding of the performance differences between AMD A4-6320 그리고 AMD FX-8100.
Compare the synthetic benchmark scores and make an informed decision on the best processor for your needs!
English
Russian
German
Portuguese
Italian
French
Japan
Spanish
Polish
Chinese
