Compare AMD A4-6320 VS AMD FX-8100. Which processor delivers superior performance?
In this detailed comparison, we evaluate the specifications and benchmarks of both processors to determine the best choice for your needs. We analyze their core counts, maximum frequencies, and power consumption.
AMD A4-6320 boasts a maximum frequency of 3.80 GHz GHz. 2 cores that enhance multitasking capabilities.With a power consumption of 65 W W, it ensures efficient performance.Released in Q1/2014, it incorporates the latest technology for optimal efficiency.
AMD FX-8100 features a maximum frequency of 2.80 GHz GHz. 8 cores designed for high-performance tasks.Its power consumption is 95 W W, providing a balance of power and efficiency.Launched in Q4/2011, it is built to handle demanding applications.
Reasons to consider Place in the overall ranking
(based on several benchmarks)
score
Higher clock speed
Around 26% better clock speed
2.80 GHz
Higher turbo clock speed
Around 8% better overclocked clock speed
3.70 GHz
Performance per watt
times less performance per watt
95 W
Common positions AMD A4-6320 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.
Reasons to consider Place in the overall ranking
(based on several benchmarks)
score
More number of cores
About 4 times more cores
2
Common positions AMD FX-8100 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.
AMD A4-6320
Comprehensive background on the processors being compared, detailing their series, generation, and targeted market segment.
Desktop / Server
AMD FX
2
AMD FX-8000
Essential parameters including the number of cores, threads, base and turbo frequencies, and cache size. These metrics provide insight into the processor’s speed—higher values generally indicate better performance.
2.80 GHz
8
3.70 GHz
8
No
Yes
normal
The integrated graphics (iGPU) do not influence the CPU performance significantly; they serve as a substitute for a dedicated graphics card in the absence of one or are utilized in mobile devices.
no iGPU
No turbo
--
This section details the built-in codecs used for encoding and decoding media content, which significantly enhance processing speed and efficiency.
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Overview of the types and quantities of RAM supported by AMD FX-8100 and AMD A4-6320. The supported memory frequencies may vary depending on the motherboard configuration.
DDR3-1866
Yes
2
Yes
Analyze the TDP (Thermal Design Power) requirements of AMD A4-6320 and AMD FX-8100 to make an informed decision on the appropriate cooling system. Remember that TDP refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.
95 W
Information on architecture, interfaces, and additional instructions supported by AMD A4-6320 and AMD FX-8100, including virtual machine technologies and fabrication processes.
x86-64 (64 bit)
AMD-V
SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, FMA3, FMA4
8.00 MB
Vishera (Bulldozer)
32 nm
AM3+
Q4/2011
By analyzing the results from various benchmarks, you can gain a clearer understanding of the performance differences between AMD A4-6320 and AMD FX-8100.
Compare the synthetic benchmark scores and make an informed decision on the best processor for your needs!
Russian
German
Portuguese
Italian
French
Japan
Spanish
Polish
Chinese
Korean
