Porównaj Intel Celeron J1750 VS Intel Celeron 847. Which processor delivers superior performance?
In this detailed comparison, we evaluate the specifications and benchmarks of both processors to determine the best choice for your needs. We analyze their core counts, maximum frequencies, and power consumption.
Intel Celeron J1750 boasts a maximum frequency of 2.41 GHz GHz. 2 cores that enhance multitasking capabilities.With a power consumption of 10 W W, it ensures efficient performance.Wydany w Q3/2013, it incorporates the latest technology for optimal efficiency.
Intel Celeron 847 features a maximum frequency of 1.10 GHz GHz. 2 cores designed for high-performance tasks.Its power consumption is 17 W W, providing a balance of power and efficiency.Launched in Q2/2011, it is built to handle demanding applications.
Powody do rozważenia Miejsce w rankingu ogólnym
(w oparciu o kilka benchmarków)
score
Wyższa prędkość zegara
Wokół 54% lepsza prędkość zegara
1.10 GHz
Wydajność na wat
mniej ciepła wytwarzanego przez procesor, W.
17 W
Wspólne stanowiska Intel Celeron J1750 Procesor w popularnych benchmarkach, dla porównania z innymi modelami.
Powody do rozważenia Miejsce w rankingu ogólnym
(w oparciu o kilka benchmarków)
score
Wspólne stanowiska Intel Celeron 847 Procesor w popularnych benchmarkach, dla porównania z innymi modelami.
Intel Celeron J1750
Comprehensive background on the processors being compared, detailing their series, generation, and targeted market segment.
Mobile
Intel Celeron
2
Intel Celeron 800
Essential parameters including the number of cores, threads, base and turbo frequencies, and cache size. These metrics provide insight into the processor’s speed—higher values generally indicate better performance.
1.10 GHz
2
No turbo
2
No turbo
Nie
Nie
normal
The integrated graphics (iGPU) do not influence the CPU performance significantly; they serve as a substitute for a dedicated graphics card in the absence of one or are utilized in mobile devices.
Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge GT1)
0.35 GHz
0.80 GHz
6
48
--
2
6
10.1
32 nm
Q2/2011
This section details the built-in codecs used for encoding and decoding media content, which significantly enhance processing speed and efficiency.
Nie
Nie
Decode / Encode
Nie
Nie
Nie
Nie
Decode
Nie
Overview of the types and quantities of RAM supported by Intel Celeron 847 oraz Intel Celeron J1750. The supported memory frequencies may vary depending on the motherboard configuration.
DDR3L-1333 SO-DIMM
Nie
2
2.0
16
Tak
Analyze the TDP (Thermal Design Power) requirements of Intel Celeron J1750 oraz Intel Celeron 847 to make an informed decision on the appropriate cooling system. Remember that TDP refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.
17 W
Information on architecture, interfaces, and additional instructions supported by Intel Celeron J1750 oraz Intel Celeron 847, including virtual machine technologies and fabrication processes.
x86-64 (64 bit)
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
SSE4.1, SSE4.2
2.00 MB
Sandy Bridge U
32 nm
BGA 1023
Q2/2011
By analyzing the results from various benchmarks, you can gain a clearer understanding of the performance differences between Intel Celeron J1750 oraz Intel Celeron 847.
Compare the synthetic benchmark scores and make an informed decision on the best processor for your needs!
English
Russian
German
Portuguese
Italian
French
Japan
Spanish
Chinese
Korean
