Compara Intel Celeron J1750 VS Intel Celeron 847. Which processor delivers superior performance?
In this detailed comparison, we evaluate the specifications and benchmarks of both processors to determine the best choice for your needs. We analyze their core counts, maximum frequencies, and power consumption.
Intel Celeron J1750 boasts a maximum frequency of 2.41 GHz GHz. 2 cores that enhance multitasking capabilities.With a power consumption of 10 W W, it ensures efficient performance.Publicado en Q3/2013, it incorporates the latest technology for optimal efficiency.
Intel Celeron 847 features a maximum frequency of 1.10 GHz GHz. 2 cores designed for high-performance tasks.Its power consumption is 17 W W, providing a balance of power and efficiency.Launched in Q2/2011, it is built to handle demanding applications.
Razones a tener en cuenta Lugar en la clasificación general
(basado en varios puntos de referencia)
score
Mayor velocidad de reloj
En 54% mejor velocidad de reloj
1.10 GHz
Rendimiento por vatio
menos calor generado por el procesador, W.
17 W
Posiciones comunes Intel Celeron J1750 CPU en pruebas de referencia populares, para comparar con otros modelos.
Razones a tener en cuenta Lugar en la clasificación general
(basado en varios puntos de referencia)
score
Posiciones comunes Intel Celeron 847 CPU en pruebas de referencia populares, para comparar con otros modelos.
Intel Celeron J1750
Comprehensive background on the processors being compared, detailing their series, generation, and targeted market segment.
Mobile
Intel Celeron
2
Intel Celeron 800
Essential parameters including the number of cores, threads, base and turbo frequencies, and cache size. These metrics provide insight into the processor’s speed—higher values generally indicate better performance.
1.10 GHz
2
sin turbo
2
sin turbo
No
No
normal
The integrated graphics (iGPU) do not influence the CPU performance significantly; they serve as a substitute for a dedicated graphics card in the absence of one or are utilized in mobile devices.
Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge GT1)
0.35 GHz
0.80 GHz
6
48
--
2
6
10.1
32 nm
Q2/2011
This section details the built-in codecs used for encoding and decoding media content, which significantly enhance processing speed and efficiency.
No
No
Decode / Encode
No
No
No
No
Decode
No
Overview of the types and quantities of RAM supported by Intel Celeron 847 y Intel Celeron J1750. The supported memory frequencies may vary depending on the motherboard configuration.
DDR3L-1333 SO-DIMM
No
2
2.0
16
Sí
Analyze the TDP (Thermal Design Power) requirements of Intel Celeron J1750 y Intel Celeron 847 to make an informed decision on the appropriate cooling system. Remember that TDP refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.
17 W
Information on architecture, interfaces, and additional instructions supported by Intel Celeron J1750 y Intel Celeron 847, including virtual machine technologies and fabrication processes.
x86-64 (64 bit)
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
SSE4.1, SSE4.2
2.00 MB
Sandy Bridge U
32 nm
BGA 1023
Q2/2011
By analyzing the results from various benchmarks, you can gain a clearer understanding of the performance differences between Intel Celeron J1750 y Intel Celeron 847.
Compare the synthetic benchmark scores and make an informed decision on the best processor for your needs!
English
Russian
German
Portuguese
Italian
French
Japan
Polish
Chinese
Korean
