Porównaj Google Tensor VS Apple A15 Bionic. Which processor delivers superior performance?
In this detailed comparison, we evaluate the specifications and benchmarks of both processors to determine the best choice for your needs. We analyze their core counts, maximum frequencies, and power consumption.
Google Tensor boasts a maximum frequency of 2.80 GHz GHz. 8 / 8 cores that enhance multitasking capabilities.With a power consumption of 10 W W, it ensures efficient performance.Wydany w Q4/2021, it incorporates the latest technology for optimal efficiency.
Apple A15 Bionic features a maximum frequency of 3.23 GHz GHz. 6 cores designed for high-performance tasks.Its power consumption is 8.5 W W, providing a balance of power and efficiency.Launched in Q3/2021, it is built to handle demanding applications.
Powody do rozważenia Miejsce w rankingu ogólnym
(w oparciu o kilka benchmarków)
score
Większa liczba rdzeni
2 Więcej rdzeni
6
Wspólne stanowiska Google Tensor Procesor w popularnych benchmarkach, dla porównania z innymi modelami.
Powody do rozważenia Miejsce w rankingu ogólnym
(w oparciu o kilka benchmarków)
score
Wyższa prędkość zegara
Wokół 13% lepsza prędkość zegara
2.80 GHz
Wydajność na wat
About 0.85 mniej ciepła wytwarzanego przez procesor, W.
10 W
Wspólne stanowiska Apple A15 Bionic Procesor w popularnych benchmarkach, dla porównania z innymi modelami.
Google Tensor
Comprehensive background on the processors being compared, detailing their series, generation, and targeted market segment.
Apple A series
Apple A15
Mobile
15
Apple A14 Bionic
Essential parameters including the number of cores, threads, base and turbo frequencies, and cache size. These metrics provide insight into the processor’s speed—higher values generally indicate better performance.
hybrid (big.LITTLE)
3.23 GHz
No turbo
Nie
Nie
The integrated graphics (iGPU) do not influence the CPU performance significantly; they serve as a substitute for a dedicated graphics card in the absence of one or are utilized in mobile devices.
Apple A15 (5 GPU Cores)
1.80 GHz
3.20 GHz
5
Shadow of the Tomb Raider has a built-in benchmark, bSilnik ten obsługuje realistyczne wyświetlanie postaci i otoczenia.
8 GB
3
12
5 nm
Q3/2021
This section details the built-in codecs used for encoding and decoding media content, which significantly enhance processing speed and efficiency.
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
Decode
Decode
Decode
Decode / Encode
Overview of the types and quantities of RAM supported by Apple A15 Bionic oraz Google Tensor. The supported memory frequencies may vary depending on the motherboard configuration.
LPDDR4X-4266
8 GB
2
Nie
Analyze the TDP (Thermal Design Power) requirements of Google Tensor oraz Apple A15 Bionic to make an informed decision on the appropriate cooling system. Remember that TDP refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.
8.5 W
Information on architecture, interfaces, and additional instructions supported by Google Tensor oraz Apple A15 Bionic, including virtual machine technologies and fabrication processes.
x86-64 (64 bit)
4.00 MB
A15
5 nm
None
N/A
Q3/2021
By analyzing the results from various benchmarks, you can gain a clearer understanding of the performance differences between Google Tensor oraz Apple A15 Bionic.
Compare the synthetic benchmark scores and make an informed decision on the best processor for your needs!
English
Russian
German
Portuguese
Italian
French
Japan
Spanish
Chinese
Korean
