Intel Celeron N2815
Intel Atom E3826
Seleziona la scheda video 1
Seleziona la scheda video 2

Intel Celeron N2815 contro Intel Atom E3826. Specifiche, prestazioni, test

Punteggio complessivo
star star star star star
Rilasciato
Q4/2013
Intel Celeron N2815
Intel Celeron N2815
Rilasciato
Q4/2013
Punteggio complessivo
star star star star star
Intel Atom E3826
Intel Atom E3826

Confronta Intel Celeron N2815 VS Intel Atom E3826. Which processor delivers superior performance?

In this detailed comparison, we evaluate the specifications and benchmarks of both processors to determine the best choice for your needs. We analyze their core counts, maximum frequencies, and power consumption.

Intel Celeron N2815 boasts a maximum frequency of 1.86 GHz GHz. 2 cores that enhance multitasking capabilities.With a power consumption of 7.5 W W, it ensures efficient performance.Rilasciato in Q4/2013, it incorporates the latest technology for optimal efficiency.

Intel Atom E3826 features a maximum frequency of 1.46 GHz GHz. 2 cores designed for high-performance tasks.Its power consumption is 7 W W, providing a balance of power and efficiency.Launched in Q4/2013, it is built to handle demanding applications.

Differenze

  • Posizione nella classifica generale

    (sulla base di diversi parametri di riferimento)

    1680 left arrow score
  • Velocità di clock più alta

    Intorno a 22% migliore velocità di clock

    1.86 GHz left arrow 1.46 GHz

Posizioni in tutte le classifiche

Posizioni comuni Intel Celeron N2815 CPU in benchmark popolari, per un confronto con altri modelli.

  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    1058 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    1050 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    1437 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    1531 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    1690 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    869 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    886 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    676 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    822 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)
    373 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    1401 place
Intel Atom E3826 Motivi da considerare
Intel Atom E3826
Segnala un bug
  • Posizione nella classifica generale

    (sulla base di diversi parametri di riferimento)

    1771 left arrow score
  • Prestazioni per watt

    About 0.93 meno calore generato dal processore, W.

    7 W left arrow 7.5 W

Posizioni in tutte le classifiche

Posizioni comuni Intel Atom E3826 CPU in benchmark popolari, per un confronto con altri modelli.

  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    1711 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    892 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    892 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    1402 place

Specifiche

Dati tecnici
Intel Celeron N2815 Intel Celeron N2815
Intel Atom E3826 Intel Atom E3826
Famiglia e gruppo di CPU

Comprehensive background on the processors being compared, detailing their series, generation, and targeted market segment.

  • Segmento
    Mobile left arrow Mobile
  • Serie
    Intel Celeron left arrow Intel Atom
  • Generazione
    6 left arrow 4
  • Gruppo CPU
    Intel Celeron J1000/N2000 left arrow Intel Atom E3800
Specifiche tecniche della CPU

Essential parameters including the number of cores, threads, base and turbo frequencies, and cache size. These metrics provide insight into the processor’s speed—higher values generally indicate better performance.

  • Frequenza
    1.86 GHz left arrow 1.46 GHz
  • Core della CPU
    2 left arrow 2
  • Turbo (1 Core)
    2.13 GHz left arrow No turbo
  • Threads della CPU
    2 left arrow 2
  • Turbo (2 Cores)
    2.13 GHz left arrow No turbo
  • Hyperthreading
    No left arrow No
  • Overclock
    No left arrow No
  • Architettura di base
    normal left arrow normal
IGPU

The integrated graphics (iGPU) do not influence the CPU performance significantly; they serve as a substitute for a dedicated graphics card in the absence of one or are utilized in mobile devices.

  • Nome della GPU
    Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1) left arrow Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1)
  • GPU frequency
    0.31 GHz left arrow 0.53 GHz
  • GPU (Turbo)
    0.76 GHz left arrow 0.67 GHz
  • Unità di esecuzione
    4 left arrow 4
  • Shader
    32 left arrow 32
  • Max. GPU Memory
    8 GB left arrow 8 GB
  • Max. displays
    2 left arrow 2
  • Generazione
    7 left arrow 7
  • DirectX Version
    11.2 left arrow 11.2
  • Processo tecnico
    22 nm left arrow 22 nm
  • Data di rilascio
    Q3/2013 left arrow Q3/2013
Supporto codec hardware

This section details the built-in codecs used for encoding and decoding media content, which significantly enhance processing speed and efficiency.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP9
    No left arrow No
  • VP8
    No left arrow No
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • AVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VC-1
    Decode left arrow Decode
  • JPEG
    Decode left arrow Decode
Specifiche di memoria e PCI

Overview of the types and quantities of RAM supported by Intel Atom E3826 e Intel Celeron N2815. The supported memory frequencies may vary depending on the motherboard configuration.

  • Tipo di memoria
    DDR3L-1066 SO-DIMM left arrow DDR3L-1066 SO-DIMM
  • ECC
    No left arrow No
  • Canali di memoria
    2 left arrow 1
  • Versione PCIe
    2.0 left arrow
  • Corsie PCIe
    4 left arrow
Crittografia
  • AES-NI
    No left arrow
Consumo di energia

Analyze the TDP (Thermal Design Power) requirements of Intel Celeron N2815 e Intel Atom E3826 to make an informed decision on the appropriate cooling system. Remember that TDP refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.

  • TDP (PL1)
    7.5 W left arrow 7 W
Tecnologie ed estensioni

Information on architecture, interfaces, and additional instructions supported by Intel Celeron N2815 e Intel Atom E3826, including virtual machine technologies and fabrication processes.

  • Set di istruzioni (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • Virtualizzazione
    VT-x, VT-x EPT left arrow VT-x, VT-x EPT
  • Estensioni ISA
    SSE4.1, SSE4.2 left arrow SSE4.1, SSE4.2
  • L3-Cache
    1.00 MB left arrow 1.00 MB
  • Architettura
    Bay Trail left arrow Bay Trail
  • Processo tecnico
    22 nm left arrow 22 nm
  • Presa
    BGA 1170 left arrow BGA 1170
  • Data di rilascio
    Q4/2013 left arrow Q4/2013

Benchmark (test)

Test di performance CPUs

By analyzing the results from various benchmarks, you can gain a clearer understanding of the performance differences between Intel Celeron N2815 e Intel Atom E3826.

Compare the synthetic benchmark scores and make an informed decision on the best processor for your needs!

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
Le prestazioni della iGPU - la GPU interna nei giochi.
48
Intel Celeron N2815
43
Intel Atom E3826
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 SC per un core della CPU, include stress test che simulano scenari 3D reali per Windows, Mac, Linux, Ansroid, iOS.
815
Intel Celeron N2815
676
Intel Atom E3826
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 MC utilizzando un multi-core e hyperthreading, include stress test che simulano scenari 3D reali per Windows, Mac, Linux, Ansroid, iOS.
1416
Intel Celeron N2815
1230
Intel Atom E3826
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
PassMark è una suite di test che esegue complessi calcoli matematici per determinare le prestazioni della CPU sulla compressione dei file, la crittografia e i compiti legati alla fisica.
1006
Intel Celeron N2815
489
Intel Atom E3826

Ultimi confronti