Intel Celeron N2815
Intel Atom E3826
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

Intel Celeron N2815 vs Intel Atom E3826. Specifications, performance, tests

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q4/2013
Intel Celeron N2815
Intel Celeron N2815
Released
Q4/2013
Overall score
star star star star star
Intel Atom E3826
Intel Atom E3826

Compare Intel Celeron N2815 VS Intel Atom E3826. Which processor delivers superior performance?

In this detailed comparison, we evaluate the specifications and benchmarks of both processors to determine the best choice for your needs. We analyze their core counts, maximum frequencies, and power consumption.

Intel Celeron N2815 boasts a maximum frequency of 1.86 GHz GHz. 2 cores that enhance multitasking capabilities.With a power consumption of 7.5 W W, it ensures efficient performance.Released in Q4/2013, it incorporates the latest technology for optimal efficiency.

Intel Atom E3826 features a maximum frequency of 1.46 GHz GHz. 2 cores designed for high-performance tasks.Its power consumption is 7 W W, providing a balance of power and efficiency.Launched in Q4/2013, it is built to handle demanding applications.

Differences

  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    1680 left arrow score
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 22% better clock speed

    1.86 GHz left arrow 1.46 GHz

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Intel Celeron N2815 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    1058 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    1050 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    1437 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    1531 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    1690 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    869 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    886 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    676 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    822 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)
    373 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    1401 place
Intel Atom E3826 Reasons to consider
Intel Atom E3826
Report a bug
  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    1771 left arrow score
  • Performance per watt

    About 0.93 times less performance per watt

    7 W left arrow 7.5 W

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Intel Atom E3826 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    1711 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    892 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    892 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    1402 place

Specifications

Technical data
Intel Celeron N2815 Intel Celeron N2815
Intel Atom E3826 Intel Atom E3826
CPU family and group

Comprehensive background on the processors being compared, detailing their series, generation, and targeted market segment.

  • Segment
    Mobile left arrow Mobile
  • Family
    Intel Celeron left arrow Intel Atom
  • Generation
    6 left arrow 4
  • CPU group
    Intel Celeron J1000/N2000 left arrow Intel Atom E3800
CPU Technical specs

Essential parameters including the number of cores, threads, base and turbo frequencies, and cache size. These metrics provide insight into the processor’s speed—higher values generally indicate better performance.

  • Frequency
    1.86 GHz left arrow 1.46 GHz
  • CPU Cores
    2 left arrow 2
  • Turbo (1 Core)
    2.13 GHz left arrow No turbo
  • CPU Threads
    2 left arrow 2
  • Turbo (2 Cores)
    2.13 GHz left arrow No turbo
  • Hyperthreading
    No left arrow No
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow No
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow normal
IGPU

The integrated graphics (iGPU) do not influence the CPU performance significantly; they serve as a substitute for a dedicated graphics card in the absence of one or are utilized in mobile devices.

  • GPU name
    Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1) left arrow Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1)
  • GPU frequency
    0.31 GHz left arrow 0.53 GHz
  • GPU (Turbo)
    0.76 GHz left arrow 0.67 GHz
  • Execution units
    4 left arrow 4
  • Shader
    32 left arrow 32
  • Max. GPU Memory
    8 GB left arrow 8 GB
  • Max. displays
    2 left arrow 2
  • Generation
    7 left arrow 7
  • DirectX Version
    11.2 left arrow 11.2
  • Technology
    22 nm left arrow 22 nm
  • Release date
    Q3/2013 left arrow Q3/2013
Hardware codec support

This section details the built-in codecs used for encoding and decoding media content, which significantly enhance processing speed and efficiency.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP9
    No left arrow No
  • VP8
    No left arrow No
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • AVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VC-1
    Decode left arrow Decode
  • JPEG
    Decode left arrow Decode
Memory specs & PCI

Overview of the types and quantities of RAM supported by Intel Atom E3826 and Intel Celeron N2815. The supported memory frequencies may vary depending on the motherboard configuration.

  • Memory type
    DDR3L-1066 SO-DIMM left arrow DDR3L-1066 SO-DIMM
  • ECC
    No left arrow No
  • Memory channels
    2 left arrow 1
  • PCIe version
    2.0 left arrow
  • PCIe lanes
    4 left arrow
Encryption
  • AES-NI
    No left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Analyze the TDP (Thermal Design Power) requirements of Intel Celeron N2815 and Intel Atom E3826 to make an informed decision on the appropriate cooling system. Remember that TDP refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.

  • TDP (PL1)
    7.5 W left arrow 7 W
Technologies and extensions

Information on architecture, interfaces, and additional instructions supported by Intel Celeron N2815 and Intel Atom E3826, including virtual machine technologies and fabrication processes.

  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • Virtualization
    VT-x, VT-x EPT left arrow VT-x, VT-x EPT
  • ISA extensions
    SSE4.1, SSE4.2 left arrow SSE4.1, SSE4.2
  • L3-Cache
    1.00 MB left arrow 1.00 MB
  • Architecture
    Bay Trail left arrow Bay Trail
  • Technology
    22 nm left arrow 22 nm
  • Socket
    BGA 1170 left arrow BGA 1170
  • Release date
    Q4/2013 left arrow Q4/2013

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

By analyzing the results from various benchmarks, you can gain a clearer understanding of the performance differences between Intel Celeron N2815 and Intel Atom E3826.

Compare the synthetic benchmark scores and make an informed decision on the best processor for your needs!

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The performance of the iGPU - the internal GPU in games
48
Intel Celeron N2815
43
Intel Atom E3826
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 SC for one CPU core, includes stress tests simulating real 3D scenarios for Windows, Mac, Linux, Ansroid, iOS
815
Intel Celeron N2815
676
Intel Atom E3826
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 MC using a multi-core and hyperthreading, includes stress tests simulating real 3D scenarios for Windows, Mac, Linux, Ansroid, iOS
1416
Intel Celeron N2815
1230
Intel Atom E3826
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
PassMark is a test suite that performs complex mathematical calculations to determine CPU performance on file compression, encryption and physics-related tasks
1006
Intel Celeron N2815
489
Intel Atom E3826

Latest comparisons