Sélectionner le processeur 1
Sélectionner le processeur 2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
Matrox LUMA A310F

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 contre Matrox LUMA A310F. Spécifications, performances, tests

Note globale
star star star star star
Libéré
Q4/2022
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
Libéré
Q2/2023
Note globale
star star star star star
Matrox LUMA A310F
Matrox LUMA A310F

Comparison of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 et Matrox LUMA A310F Now is the perfect time to figure out which graphics card delivers the highest performance, what sets them apart, and the reasons behind those differences.

In front of you is a detailed comparison between the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 and the Matrox LUMA A310F to assist you in selecting the best card for your needs, we will examine their specifications, benchmark scores, and overall performance, guiding you toward an informed decision.

Comparing the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 to the Matrox LUMA A310F analyzing performance in various popular benchmarks highlights the key differences between these models. By understanding the distinctions between these two cards, you’ll be able to choose the best option for your needs, whether you’re a gamer, content creator, or someone seeking pure processing power..

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090: boasts a maximum frequency of 2.235 GHz GHz + 6%. It is equipped with 24 GBGB of RAM. The memory type is GDDR6X. It was released in Q4/2022.

Matrox LUMA A310F: It has a maximum clock speed of 2.000 GHz GHz. It comes with 4 GBGB of memory. The memory type is GDDR6. Released in Q1 Q2/2023.

Differences

  • Vitesse d'horloge plus élevée

    Autour de 11% une meilleure vitesse d'horloge

    2.235 GHz left arrow 2.000 GHz
  • Plus de mémoire

    83% de mémoire supplémentaire

    24 GB left arrow 4 GB

Positions dans tous les classements

Positions communes NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 GPU dans des benchmarks populaires, pour comparaison avec d'autres modèles.

No data
Videokards Raisons de considérer
Matrox LUMA A310F
Signaler un bogue

Positions dans tous les classements

Positions communes Matrox LUMA A310F GPU dans des benchmarks populaires, pour comparaison avec d'autres modèles.

  • Shadow of the Tomb Raider
    2982 place

Spécifications

Données techniques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
Matrox LUMA A310F Matrox LUMA A310F
General Information

This section provides a detailed comparison of the fundamental technical specifications of the graphics cards NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 et Matrox LUMA A310F. It provides essential details like the GPU architecture, the number of processing units, and other key features that significantly influence the overall performance of the cards across different applications, including gaming and professional tasks..

  • Sur la base de
    NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 left arrow Intel Arc A310 Graphics
  • Puce GPU
    AD102-300 / AD102-301 (Ada Lovelace) left arrow ACM-G11 (Alchemist)
  • Streaming Multiprocessors
    128 left arrow 96
  • Shader
    16384 left arrow 768
  • Unités de sortie de rendu
    192 left arrow 16
  • Unités de texture
    512 left arrow 32
  • Raytracing Cores
    128 left arrow 6
Memory Configuration

This section provides a comparison of the memory configurations of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 et Matrox LUMA A310F. It includes details such as the memory size, type (e.g., GDDR6, HBM2), and bandwidth, which are key factors that determine how efficiently the card handles large textures, data sets, and high-resolution tasks.Larger memory sizes are typically beneficial for demanding applications like 4K gaming and video editing.

  • Taille de la mémoire
    24 GB left arrow 4 GB
  • Type de mémoire
    GDDR6X left arrow GDDR6
  • Memory Clock
    1.313 GHz left arrow 1.938 GHz
  • Vitesse de la mémoire
    21.0 Gbps left arrow 15.5 Gbps
  • Memory bandwidth
    1008 GB/s left arrow 124 GB/s
  • Interface mémoire
    384 bit left arrow 64 bit
Fréquence d'horloge

This section focuses on comparing the clock speeds of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 et Matrox LUMA A310F. It covers both the base and boost clock speeds, which have a direct impact on GPU performance during demanding tasks. Higher clock speeds generally result in smoother frame rates in games and faster processing in compute-intensive applications..

  • Fréquence de base
    2.235 GHz left arrow 2.000 GHz
  • Fréquence maximale
    2.520 GHz left arrow 2.000 GHz
  • Avg (Game) Clock
    -- left arrow --
  • Overclocking
    Oui left arrow Oui
Consommation d'énergie

This section examines the thermal design of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 et Matrox LUMA A310F. It provides information on power consumption (in watts) and thermal output during normal use and overclocking. Effective thermal management is crucial for ensuring stable performance during extended gaming sessions or other intensive tasks..

  • TDP
    450 W left arrow 50 W-33 %
  • TDP (up)
    450 W-25 % left arrow --
  • Tjunction max
    90 °C left arrow --
  • PCIe-Power
    -- left arrow --
Cooling System

This section compares the cooling systems of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 et Matrox LUMA A310F. It includes details about the types of coolers (e.g., blower or open-air) and the number and size of fans, which play a crucial role in maintaining optimal temperatures during operation.Effective cooling is essential for preventing thermal throttling and extending the longevity of the GPU.

  • Type de ventilateur
    Axial left arrow Radial
  • Ventilateur 1
    2 x 110 mm left arrow 1 x 70 mm
  • Ventilateur 2
    -- left arrow --
  • Type de refroidisseur
    Air cooling left arrow Air cooling
  • Noise (Idle)
    0 dB / Silent left arrow 0 dB / Silent
  • Noise (Load)
    39 dB left arrow --
Interfaces

This section compares the connectivity options available on NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 et Matrox LUMA A310F. This includes details on the number and types of ports, such as HDMI, DisplayPort, and others, which are crucial for connecting monitors and external devices..This information assists in identifying which card provides more flexible or up-to-date connectivity features..

  • Max. Affichages
    4 left arrow 4
  • Version HDCP
    2.3 left arrow 2.3
  • Ports HDMI
    1x HDMI v2.1 left arrow --
  • DP Ports
    3x DP v1.4a left arrow 4x DP v2.1
  • Ports DVI
    -- left arrow --
  • VGA Ports
    -- left arrow --
  • USB-C Ports
    -- left arrow --
Technical Specifications

This section compares the technical specifications of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 et Matrox LUMA A310F. It highlights key features such as API support for DirectX, OpenGL, and Vulkan, which are crucial for running modern games and applications efficiently.These specifications ensure compatibility and optimal performance across a wide range of software environments.

  • Résolution maximale
    7680x4320 left arrow 7680x4320
  • DirectX
    12_2 (Ultimate) left arrow 12_2 (Ultimate)
  • Raytracing
    Oui left arrow Oui
  • DLSS / FSR
    Oui left arrow Non
  • LED
    No LED lighting left arrow No LED lighting
Codecs vidéo pris en charge

This section compares the support for video codecs on NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 et Matrox LUMA A310F. It highlights the built-in capabilities for compressing and decompressing video formats such as H.264, H.265 (HEVC), and VP9, which are important for tasks like video editing and streaming.

  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP8
    Decode left arrow Non
  • VP9
    Decode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • AV1
    Decode left arrow Decode / Encode
Dimensions

This section compares the physical dimensions of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 et Matrox LUMA A310F. It covers the size, weight, and slot requirements, which are key factors in ensuring compatibility with your PC case, particularly for smaller or more compact setups..

  • Longueur
    304 mm left arrow 168 mm
  • Hauteur
    137 mm left arrow 69 mm
  • Width
    61 mm left arrow --
  • Largeur (fentes)
    3 PCIe-Slots left arrow 1 PCIe-Slots
  • Weight
    -- left arrow --
Additional Information

This section provides additional information about NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 et Matrox LUMA A310F. It covers aspects such as release dates, interface compatibility, and other unique features that might not be covered in other sections.This helps users make a more informed decision about the suitability of each card for their specific use case.

  • Interface GPU
    PCIe 4.0 x 16 left arrow PCIe 4.0 x 8
  • Date de sortie
    Q4/2022 left arrow Q2/2023
  • Launch Price
    1,599 $ (Reference) left arrow --
  • Processus technologique
    4 nm left arrow 6 nm
  • Part-no
    -- left arrow LUMA-A310F
  • spécification
    data sheet left arrow data sheet

Benchmarks

Tests de performance GPUs

By reviewing the results from several well-known benchmarks, you can more accurately assess the performance differences between NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 et Matrox LUMA A310F.

Compare the synthetic benchmark results and select the best graphics card for your needs!

FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS)
Le benchmark FP32 est un calcul en virgule flottante 32 bits pour le GPU, nécessaire pour les jeux en 3D.
82.58
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
3.07
Matrox LUMA A310F

Dernières comparaisons