Matrox LUMA A310F contre ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC. Spécifications, performances, tests

This section provides a detailed comparison of the fundamental technical specifications of the graphics cards Matrox LUMA A310F et ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC. It provides essential details like the GPU architecture, the number of processing units, and other key features that significantly influence the overall performance of the cards across different applications, including gaming and professional tasks..

• Sur la base de
  Intel Arc A310 Graphics Intel Arc A750 Graphics
• Puce GPU
  ACM-G11 (Alchemist) ACM-G10 (Alchemist)
• Streaming Multiprocessors
  96 448
• Shader
  768 3584
• Unités de sortie de rendu
  16 112
• Unités de texture
  32 224
• Raytracing Cores
  6 28

This section provides a comparison of the memory configurations of Matrox LUMA A310F et ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC. It includes details such as the memory size, type (e.g., GDDR6, HBM2), and bandwidth, which are key factors that determine how efficiently the card handles large textures, data sets, and high-resolution tasks.Larger memory sizes are typically beneficial for demanding applications like 4K gaming and video editing.

• Taille de la mémoire
  4 GB 8 GB
• Type de mémoire
  GDDR6 GDDR6
• Memory Clock
  1.938 GHz 2.000 GHz
• Vitesse de la mémoire
  15.5 Gbps 16 Gbps
• Memory bandwidth
  124 GB/s 512 GB/s
• Interface mémoire
  64 bit 256 bit

This section focuses on comparing the clock speeds of Matrox LUMA A310F et ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC. It covers both the base and boost clock speeds, which have a direct impact on GPU performance during demanding tasks. Higher clock speeds generally result in smoother frame rates in games and faster processing in compute-intensive applications..

• Fréquence de base
  2.000 GHz 2.200 GHz+ 7 %
• Fréquence maximale
  2.000 GHz 2.200 GHz
• Avg (Game) Clock
  -- --
• Overclocking
  Oui Oui

This section examines the thermal design of Matrox LUMA A310F et ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC. It provides information on power consumption (in watts) and thermal output during normal use and overclocking. Effective thermal management is crucial for ensuring stable performance during extended gaming sessions or other intensive tasks..

• TDP
  50 W-33 % 225 W
• TDP (up)
  -- --
• Tjunction max
  -- --
• PCIe-Power
  -- 2 x 8-Pin

This section compares the cooling systems of Matrox LUMA A310F et ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC. It includes details about the types of coolers (e.g., blower or open-air) and the number and size of fans, which play a crucial role in maintaining optimal temperatures during operation.Effective cooling is essential for preventing thermal throttling and extending the longevity of the GPU.

• Type de ventilateur
  Radial Axial
• Ventilateur 1
  1 x 70 mm 2 x 100 mm
• Ventilateur 2
  -- --
• Type de refroidisseur
  Air cooling Air cooling
• Noise (Idle)
  0 dB / Silent 0 dB / Silent
• Noise (Load)
  -- --

This section compares the connectivity options available on Matrox LUMA A310F et ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC. This includes details on the number and types of ports, such as HDMI, DisplayPort, and others, which are crucial for connecting monitors and external devices..This information assists in identifying which card provides more flexible or up-to-date connectivity features..

• Max. Affichages
  4 4
• Version HDCP
  2.3 2.3
• Ports HDMI
  -- 2x HDMI v2.1
• DP Ports
  4x DP v2.1 2x DP v2.0
• Ports DVI
  -- --
• VGA Ports
  -- --
• USB-C Ports
  -- --

This section compares the technical specifications of Matrox LUMA A310F et ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC. It highlights key features such as API support for DirectX, OpenGL, and Vulkan, which are crucial for running modern games and applications efficiently.These specifications ensure compatibility and optimal performance across a wide range of software environments.

• Résolution maximale
  7680x4320 7680x4320
• DirectX
  12_2 (Ultimate) 12_2 (Ultimate)
• Raytracing
  Oui Oui
• DLSS / FSR
  Non Non
• LED
  No LED lighting No LED lighting

This section compares the support for video codecs on Matrox LUMA A310F et ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC. It highlights the built-in capabilities for compressing and decompressing video formats such as H.264, H.265 (HEVC), and VP9, which are important for tasks like video editing and streaming.

• h264
  Decode / Encode Decode / Encode
• h265 / HEVC
  Decode / Encode Decode / Encode
• VP8
  Non Non
• VP9
  Decode / Encode Decode / Encode
• AV1
  Decode / Encode Decode / Encode

This section compares the physical dimensions of Matrox LUMA A310F et ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC. It covers the size, weight, and slot requirements, which are key factors in ensuring compatibility with your PC case, particularly for smaller or more compact setups..

• Longueur
  168 mm 271 mm
• Hauteur
  69 mm 132 mm
• Width
  -- 48 mm
• Largeur (fentes)
  1 PCIe-Slots 3 PCIe-Slots
• Weight
  -- 785 g

This section provides additional information about Matrox LUMA A310F et ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC. It covers aspects such as release dates, interface compatibility, and other unique features that might not be covered in other sections.This helps users make a more informed decision about the suitability of each card for their specific use case.

• Interface GPU
  PCIe 4.0 x 8 PCIe 4.0 x 16
• Date de sortie
  Q2/2023 Q4/2022
• Launch Price
  -- --
• Processus technologique
  6 nm 6 nm
• Part-no
  LUMA-A310F A750 CLD 8GO
• spécification
  data sheet data sheet