Comparison of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 と Matrox LUMA A310F Now is the perfect time to figure out which graphics card delivers the highest performance, what sets them apart, and the reasons behind those differences.
In front of you is a detailed comparison between the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 and the Matrox LUMA A310F to assist you in selecting the best card for your needs, we will examine their specifications, benchmark scores, and overall performance, guiding you toward an informed decision.
Comparing the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 to the Matrox LUMA A310F analyzing performance in various popular benchmarks highlights the key differences between these models. By understanding the distinctions between these two cards, you’ll be able to choose the best option for your needs, whether you’re a gamer, content creator, or someone seeking pure processing power..
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090: boasts a maximum frequency of 2.235 GHz GHz + 6%. It is equipped with 24 GBGB of RAM. The memory type is GDDR6X. It was released in Q4/2022.
Matrox LUMA A310F: It has a maximum clock speed of 2.000 GHz GHz. It comes with 4 GBGB of memory. The memory type is GDDR6. Released in Q1 Q2/2023.
考慮すべき理由 クロックの高速化
周辺 11% クロックスピードの向上
2.000 GHz
その他のメモリ
83メモリ増量
4 GB
共通ポジション NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 他機種との比較のため、一般的なベンチマークでGPUを使用。.
No data
考慮すべき理由 共通ポジション Matrox LUMA A310F 他機種との比較のため、一般的なベンチマークでGPUを使用。.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
This section provides a detailed comparison of the fundamental technical specifications of the graphics cards NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 と Matrox LUMA A310F. It provides essential details like the GPU architecture, the number of processing units, and other key features that significantly influence the overall performance of the cards across different applications, including gaming and professional tasks..
Intel Arc A310 Graphics
ACM-G11 (Alchemist)
96
768
16
32
6
This section provides a comparison of the memory configurations of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 と Matrox LUMA A310F. It includes details such as the memory size, type (e.g., GDDR6, HBM2), and bandwidth, which are key factors that determine how efficiently the card handles large textures, data sets, and high-resolution tasks.Larger memory sizes are typically beneficial for demanding applications like 4K gaming and video editing.
4 GB
GDDR6
1.938 GHz
15.5 Gbps
124 GB/s
64 bit
This section focuses on comparing the clock speeds of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 と Matrox LUMA A310F. It covers both the base and boost clock speeds, which have a direct impact on GPU performance during demanding tasks. Higher clock speeds generally result in smoother frame rates in games and faster processing in compute-intensive applications..
2.000 GHz
2.000 GHz
--
はい
This section examines the thermal design of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 と Matrox LUMA A310F. It provides information on power consumption (in watts) and thermal output during normal use and overclocking. Effective thermal management is crucial for ensuring stable performance during extended gaming sessions or other intensive tasks..
50 W-33 %
--
--
--
This section compares the cooling systems of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 と Matrox LUMA A310F. It includes details about the types of coolers (e.g., blower or open-air) and the number and size of fans, which play a crucial role in maintaining optimal temperatures during operation.Effective cooling is essential for preventing thermal throttling and extending the longevity of the GPU.
Radial
1 x 70 mm
--
Air cooling
0 dB / Silent
--
This section compares the connectivity options available on NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 と Matrox LUMA A310F. This includes details on the number and types of ports, such as HDMI, DisplayPort, and others, which are crucial for connecting monitors and external devices..This information assists in identifying which card provides more flexible or up-to-date connectivity features..
4
2.3
--
4x DP v2.1
--
--
--
This section compares the technical specifications of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 と Matrox LUMA A310F. It highlights key features such as API support for DirectX, OpenGL, and Vulkan, which are crucial for running modern games and applications efficiently.These specifications ensure compatibility and optimal performance across a wide range of software environments.
7680x4320
12_2 (Ultimate)
はい
いいえ
No LED lighting
This section compares the support for video codecs on NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 と Matrox LUMA A310F. It highlights the built-in capabilities for compressing and decompressing video formats such as H.264, H.265 (HEVC), and VP9, which are important for tasks like video editing and streaming.
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
いいえ
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
This section compares the physical dimensions of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 と Matrox LUMA A310F. It covers the size, weight, and slot requirements, which are key factors in ensuring compatibility with your PC case, particularly for smaller or more compact setups..
168 mm
69 mm
--
1 PCIe-Slots
--
This section provides additional information about NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 と Matrox LUMA A310F. It covers aspects such as release dates, interface compatibility, and other unique features that might not be covered in other sections.This helps users make a more informed decision about the suitability of each card for their specific use case.
PCIe 4.0 x 8
Q2/2023
--
6 nm
LUMA-A310F
data sheet
By reviewing the results from several well-known benchmarks, you can more accurately assess the performance differences between NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 と Matrox LUMA A310F.
Compare the synthetic benchmark results and select the best graphics card for your needs!
English
Russian
German
Portuguese
Italian
French
Spanish
Polish
Chinese
Korean
