选择处理器1
选择处理器2
Matrox LUMA A310F
ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC

Matrox LUMA A310F 对 ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC. 规格、性能、测试

总分
star star star star star
已发布
Q2/2023
Matrox LUMA A310F
Matrox LUMA A310F
已发布
Q4/2022
总分
star star star star star
ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC
ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC

Comparison of Matrox LUMA A310F 和 ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC Now is the perfect time to figure out which graphics card delivers the highest performance, what sets them apart, and the reasons behind those differences.

In front of you is a detailed comparison between the Matrox LUMA A310F and the ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC to assist you in selecting the best card for your needs, we will examine their specifications, benchmark scores, and overall performance, guiding you toward an informed decision.

Comparing the Matrox LUMA A310F to the ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC analyzing performance in various popular benchmarks highlights the key differences between these models. By understanding the distinctions between these two cards, you’ll be able to choose the best option for your needs, whether you’re a gamer, content creator, or someone seeking pure processing power..

Matrox LUMA A310F: boasts a maximum frequency of 2.000 GHz GHz + 6%. It is equipped with 4 GBGB of RAM. The memory type is GDDR6. It was released in Q2/2023.

ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC: It has a maximum clock speed of 2.200 GHz+ 7 % GHz. It comes with 8 GBGB of memory. The memory type is GDDR6. Released in Q1 Q4/2022.

差异


所有排名中的位置

共同立场 Matrox LUMA A310F 在流行的基准测试中的GPU,用于与其他模型进行比较.

  • Shadow of the Tomb Raider
    2982 place
  • 更高的时钟速度

    左右 9% 更好的时钟速度

    2.200 GHz+ 7 % left arrow 2.000 GHz
  • 更多内存

    50更多内存百分比

    8 GB left arrow 4 GB

所有排名中的位置

共同立场 ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC 在流行的基准测试中的GPU,用于与其他模型进行比较.

  • Shadow of the Tomb Raider
    1215 place

规格

技术数据
Matrox LUMA A310F Matrox LUMA A310F
ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC
General Information

This section provides a detailed comparison of the fundamental technical specifications of the graphics cards Matrox LUMA A310F 和 ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC. It provides essential details like the GPU architecture, the number of processing units, and other key features that significantly influence the overall performance of the cards across different applications, including gaming and professional tasks..

  • 基于
    Intel Arc A310 Graphics left arrow Intel Arc A750 Graphics
  • GPU芯片
    ACM-G11 (Alchemist) left arrow ACM-G10 (Alchemist)
  • Streaming Multiprocessors
    96 left arrow 448
  • 着色器
    768 left arrow 3584
  • 渲染输出单位
    16 left arrow 112
  • 纹理单位
    32 left arrow 224
  • Raytracing Cores
    6 left arrow 28
Memory Configuration

This section provides a comparison of the memory configurations of Matrox LUMA A310F 和 ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC. It includes details such as the memory size, type (e.g., GDDR6, HBM2), and bandwidth, which are key factors that determine how efficiently the card handles large textures, data sets, and high-resolution tasks.Larger memory sizes are typically beneficial for demanding applications like 4K gaming and video editing.

  • 内存大小
    4 GB left arrow 8 GB
  • 存储器类型
    GDDR6 left arrow GDDR6
  • Memory Clock
    1.938 GHz left arrow 2.000 GHz
  • 内存速度
    15.5 Gbps left arrow 16 Gbps
  • Memory bandwidth
    124 GB/s left arrow 512 GB/s
  • 存储器接口
    64 bit left arrow 256 bit
时钟频率

This section focuses on comparing the clock speeds of Matrox LUMA A310F 和 ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC. It covers both the base and boost clock speeds, which have a direct impact on GPU performance during demanding tasks. Higher clock speeds generally result in smoother frame rates in games and faster processing in compute-intensive applications..

  • 基准频率
    2.000 GHz left arrow 2.200 GHz+ 7 %
  • 最大频率
    2.000 GHz left arrow 2.200 GHz
  • Avg (Game) Clock
    -- left arrow --
  • 超频
    left arrow
能源消耗

This section examines the thermal design of Matrox LUMA A310F 和 ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC. It provides information on power consumption (in watts) and thermal output during normal use and overclocking. Effective thermal management is crucial for ensuring stable performance during extended gaming sessions or other intensive tasks..

  • TDP
    50 W-33 % left arrow 225 W
  • TDP (up)
    -- left arrow --
  • Tjunction max
    -- left arrow --
  • PCIe-Power
    -- left arrow 2 x 8-Pin
Cooling System

This section compares the cooling systems of Matrox LUMA A310F 和 ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC. It includes details about the types of coolers (e.g., blower or open-air) and the number and size of fans, which play a crucial role in maintaining optimal temperatures during operation.Effective cooling is essential for preventing thermal throttling and extending the longevity of the GPU.

  • 风扇类型
    Radial left arrow Axial
  • 风扇1
    1 x 70 mm left arrow 2 x 100 mm
  • 风扇2
    -- left arrow --
  • 冷却器类型
    Air cooling left arrow Air cooling
  • Noise (Idle)
    0 dB / Silent left arrow 0 dB / Silent
  • Noise (Load)
    -- left arrow --
接口

This section compares the connectivity options available on Matrox LUMA A310F 和 ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC. This includes details on the number and types of ports, such as HDMI, DisplayPort, and others, which are crucial for connecting monitors and external devices..This information assists in identifying which card provides more flexible or up-to-date connectivity features..

  • 最大。显示
    4 left arrow 4
  • HDCP-版本
    2.3 left arrow 2.3
  • HDMI端口
    -- left arrow 2x HDMI v2.1
  • DP Ports
    4x DP v2.1 left arrow 2x DP v2.0
  • DVI端口
    -- left arrow --
  • VGA Ports
    -- left arrow --
  • USB-C Ports
    -- left arrow --
Technical Specifications

This section compares the technical specifications of Matrox LUMA A310F 和 ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC. It highlights key features such as API support for DirectX, OpenGL, and Vulkan, which are crucial for running modern games and applications efficiently.These specifications ensure compatibility and optimal performance across a wide range of software environments.

  • 最大分辨率
    7680x4320 left arrow 7680x4320
  • DirectX
    12_2 (Ultimate) left arrow 12_2 (Ultimate)
  • 光线追踪
    left arrow
  • DLSS / FSR
    没有 left arrow 没有
  • LED
    No LED lighting left arrow No LED lighting
支持的视频编解码器

This section compares the support for video codecs on Matrox LUMA A310F 和 ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC. It highlights the built-in capabilities for compressing and decompressing video formats such as H.264, H.265 (HEVC), and VP9, which are important for tasks like video editing and streaming.

  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP8
    没有 left arrow 没有
  • VP9
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • AV1
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
尺寸

This section compares the physical dimensions of Matrox LUMA A310F 和 ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC. It covers the size, weight, and slot requirements, which are key factors in ensuring compatibility with your PC case, particularly for smaller or more compact setups..

  • 长度
    168 mm left arrow 271 mm
  • 高度
    69 mm left arrow 132 mm
  • Width
    -- left arrow 48 mm
  • 宽度(槽位)
    1 PCIe-Slots left arrow 3 PCIe-Slots
  • Weight
    -- left arrow 785 g
Additional Information

This section provides additional information about Matrox LUMA A310F 和 ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC. It covers aspects such as release dates, interface compatibility, and other unique features that might not be covered in other sections.This helps users make a more informed decision about the suitability of each card for their specific use case.

  • GPU接口
    PCIe 4.0 x 8 left arrow PCIe 4.0 x 16
  • 发布日期
    Q2/2023 left arrow Q4/2022
  • Launch Price
    -- left arrow --
  • 技术过程
    6 nm left arrow 6 nm
  • LUMA-A310F left arrow A750 CLD 8GO
  • 规格
    data sheet left arrow data sheet

基准

性能测试 GPUs

By reviewing the results from several well-known benchmarks, you can more accurately assess the performance differences between Matrox LUMA A310F 和 ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC.

Compare the synthetic benchmark results and select the best graphics card for your needs!

Shadow of the Tomb Raider
古墓丽影》有一个内置的基准,基于水晶动力基金会的引擎
7 fps (avg)
Matrox LUMA A310F
43 fps (avg)
ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC
FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS)
基准FP32是GPU的32位浮点计算,这是3D游戏需要的。
3.07
Matrox LUMA A310F
15.76
ASRock Intel Arc A750 Challenger D 8GB OC

最新比较