Compara AMD FX-8150 VS AMD Athlon II X4 760K. Which processor delivers superior performance?
In this detailed comparison, we evaluate the specifications and benchmarks of both processors to determine the best choice for your needs. We analyze their core counts, maximum frequencies, and power consumption.
AMD FX-8150 boasts a maximum frequency of 3.60 GHz GHz. 8 cores that enhance multitasking capabilities.With a power consumption of 125 W W, it ensures efficient performance.Publicado en Q4/2011, it incorporates the latest technology for optimal efficiency.
AMD Athlon II X4 760K features a maximum frequency of 3.80 GHz GHz. 4 cores designed for high-performance tasks.Its power consumption is 100 W W, providing a balance of power and efficiency.Launched in Q2/2013, it is built to handle demanding applications.
Razones a tener en cuenta Lugar en la clasificación general
(basado en varios puntos de referencia)
score
Más número de núcleos
4 Más núcleos
4
Mayor velocidad de reloj turbo
En 2% mejor velocidad de reloj en overclocking
4.10 GHz
Posiciones comunes AMD FX-8150 CPU en pruebas de referencia populares, para comparar con otros modelos.
Razones a tener en cuenta Lugar en la clasificación general
(basado en varios puntos de referencia)
score
Mayor velocidad de reloj
En 5% mejor velocidad de reloj
3.60 GHz
Rendimiento por vatio
About 0.8 menos calor generado por el procesador, W.
125 W
Posiciones comunes AMD Athlon II X4 760K CPU en pruebas de referencia populares, para comparar con otros modelos.
AMD FX-8150
Comprehensive background on the processors being compared, detailing their series, generation, and targeted market segment.
Desktop / Server
AMD Athlon II
1
AMD Athlon II (Richland)
Essential parameters including the number of cores, threads, base and turbo frequencies, and cache size. These metrics provide insight into the processor’s speed—higher values generally indicate better performance.
3.80 GHz
4
4.10 GHz
4
No
Sí
normal
The integrated graphics (iGPU) do not influence the CPU performance significantly; they serve as a substitute for a dedicated graphics card in the absence of one or are utilized in mobile devices.
sin iGPU
sin turbo
This section details the built-in codecs used for encoding and decoding media content, which significantly enhance processing speed and efficiency.
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Overview of the types and quantities of RAM supported by AMD Athlon II X4 760K y AMD FX-8150. The supported memory frequencies may vary depending on the motherboard configuration.
DDR3-1866
No
1
No
Analyze the TDP (Thermal Design Power) requirements of AMD FX-8150 y AMD Athlon II X4 760K to make an informed decision on the appropriate cooling system. Remember that TDP refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.
100 W
Information on architecture, interfaces, and additional instructions supported by AMD FX-8150 y AMD Athlon II X4 760K, including virtual machine technologies and fabrication processes.
x86-64 (64 bit)
None
SSE3
4.00 MB
Richland
32 nm
FM2
Q2/2013
By analyzing the results from various benchmarks, you can gain a clearer understanding of the performance differences between AMD FX-8150 y AMD Athlon II X4 760K.
Compare the synthetic benchmark scores and make an informed decision on the best processor for your needs!
English
Russian
German
Portuguese
Italian
French
Japan
Polish
Chinese
Korean
