AMD FX-8150
AMD Athlon II X4 760K
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

AMD FX-8150 vs AMD Athlon II X4 760K. Specifications, performance, tests

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q4/2011
AMD FX-8150
AMD FX-8150
Released
Q2/2013
Overall score
star star star star star
AMD Athlon II X4 760K
AMD Athlon II X4 760K

Compare AMD FX-8150 VS AMD Athlon II X4 760K. Which processor delivers superior performance?

In this detailed comparison, we evaluate the specifications and benchmarks of both processors to determine the best choice for your needs. We analyze their core counts, maximum frequencies, and power consumption.

AMD FX-8150 boasts a maximum frequency of 3.60 GHz GHz. 8 cores that enhance multitasking capabilities.With a power consumption of 125 W W, it ensures efficient performance.Released in Q4/2011, it incorporates the latest technology for optimal efficiency.

AMD Athlon II X4 760K features a maximum frequency of 3.80 GHz GHz. 4 cores designed for high-performance tasks.Its power consumption is 100 W W, providing a balance of power and efficiency.Launched in Q2/2013, it is built to handle demanding applications.

Differences

AMD FX-8150 Reasons to consider
AMD FX-8150
Report a bug
  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    1112 left arrow score
  • More number of cores

    4 times more cores

    8 left arrow 4
  • Higher turbo clock speed

    Around 2% better overclocked clock speed

    4.20 GHz left arrow 4.10 GHz

Positions in all rankings

Common positions AMD FX-8150 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    1121 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    894 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    612 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    375 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    355 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    383 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    682 place
  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    1385 left arrow score
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 5% better clock speed

    3.80 GHz left arrow 3.60 GHz
  • Performance per watt

    About 0.8 times less performance per watt

    100 W left arrow 125 W

Positions in all rankings

Common positions AMD Athlon II X4 760K CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    857 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    764 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    1142 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    1150 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    632 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    621 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    772 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    520 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    911 place

Specifications

Technical data
AMD FX-8150 AMD FX-8150
AMD Athlon II X4 760K AMD Athlon II X4 760K
CPU family and group

Comprehensive background on the processors being compared, detailing their series, generation, and targeted market segment.

  • Segment
    Desktop / Server left arrow Desktop / Server
  • Family
    AMD FX left arrow AMD Athlon II
  • Generation
    2 left arrow 1
  • CPU group
    AMD FX-8000 left arrow AMD Athlon II (Richland)
CPU Technical specs

Essential parameters including the number of cores, threads, base and turbo frequencies, and cache size. These metrics provide insight into the processor’s speed—higher values generally indicate better performance.

  • Frequency
    3.60 GHz left arrow 3.80 GHz
  • CPU Cores
    8 left arrow 4
  • Turbo (1 Core)
    4.20 GHz left arrow 4.10 GHz
  • CPU Threads
    8 left arrow 4
  • Hyperthreading
    No left arrow No
  • Overclocking
    Yes left arrow Yes
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow normal
IGPU

The integrated graphics (iGPU) do not influence the CPU performance significantly; they serve as a substitute for a dedicated graphics card in the absence of one or are utilized in mobile devices.

  • GPU name
    no iGPU left arrow no iGPU
  • GPU (Turbo)
    No turbo left arrow No turbo
Hardware codec support

This section details the built-in codecs used for encoding and decoding media content, which significantly enhance processing speed and efficiency.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h264
    No left arrow No
  • VP9
    No left arrow No
  • VP8
    No left arrow No
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • AVC
    No left arrow No
  • VC-1
    No left arrow No
  • JPEG
    No left arrow No
Memory specs & PCI

Overview of the types and quantities of RAM supported by AMD Athlon II X4 760K and AMD FX-8150. The supported memory frequencies may vary depending on the motherboard configuration.

  • Memory type
    DDR3-1866 left arrow DDR3-1866
  • ECC
    Yes left arrow No
  • Memory channels
    2 left arrow 1
Encryption
  • AES-NI
    Yes left arrow No
Thermal Management

Analyze the TDP (Thermal Design Power) requirements of AMD FX-8150 and AMD Athlon II X4 760K to make an informed decision on the appropriate cooling system. Remember that TDP refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.

  • TDP (PL1)
    125 W left arrow 100 W
Technologies and extensions

Information on architecture, interfaces, and additional instructions supported by AMD FX-8150 and AMD Athlon II X4 760K, including virtual machine technologies and fabrication processes.

  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • Virtualization
    AMD-V left arrow None
  • ISA extensions
    SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, FMA3, FMA4 left arrow SSE3
  • L3-Cache
    8.00 MB left arrow 4.00 MB
  • Architecture
    Vishera (Bulldozer) left arrow Richland
  • Technology
    32 nm left arrow 32 nm
  • Socket
    AM3+ left arrow FM2
  • Release date
    Q4/2011 left arrow Q2/2013

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

By analyzing the results from various benchmarks, you can gain a clearer understanding of the performance differences between AMD FX-8150 and AMD Athlon II X4 760K.

Compare the synthetic benchmark scores and make an informed decision on the best processor for your needs!

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 SC is a popular cross-platform performance test for desktop or mobile processors that uses system memory intensively
512
AMD FX-8150
491
AMD Athlon II X4 760K
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 MC is a popular cross-platform performance test for desktop or mobile processors that uses system memory intensively
2431
AMD FX-8150
1403
AMD Athlon II X4 760K
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 SC for one CPU core, includes stress tests simulating real 3D scenarios for Windows, Mac, Linux, Ansroid, iOS
2056
AMD FX-8150
1969
AMD Athlon II X4 760K
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 MC using a multi-core and hyperthreading, includes stress tests simulating real 3D scenarios for Windows, Mac, Linux, Ansroid, iOS
10660
AMD FX-8150
5014
AMD Athlon II X4 760K
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
The PC CPU and GPU test involves rendering a specific 3D scene in single-core mode, based on CINEMA 4D
1.14
AMD FX-8150
0.97
AMD Athlon II X4 760K
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
The PC CPU and GPU test involves rendering a specific 3D scene in multi-core mode and hyperthreading, based on CINEMA 4D
5.91
AMD FX-8150
3.88
AMD Athlon II X4 760K
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
PassMark is a test suite that performs complex mathematical calculations to determine CPU performance on file compression, encryption and physics-related tasks
7720
AMD FX-8150
4444
AMD Athlon II X4 760K

Latest comparisons