Intel Xeon W-3275M
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

Intel Xeon W-3275M vs AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X. Specifications, performance, tests

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q2/2019
Intel Xeon W-3275M
Intel Xeon W-3275M
Released
Q3/2018
Overall score
star star star star star
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X

Compare Intel Xeon W-3275M VS AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X. Which processor delivers superior performance?

In this detailed comparison, we evaluate the specifications and benchmarks of both processors to determine the best choice for your needs. We analyze their core counts, maximum frequencies, and power consumption.

Intel Xeon W-3275M boasts a maximum frequency of 2.50 GHz GHz. 28 cores that enhance multitasking capabilities.With a power consumption of 205 W W, it ensures efficient performance.Released in Q2/2019, it incorporates the latest technology for optimal efficiency.

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X features a maximum frequency of 3.50 GHz GHz. 12 cores designed for high-performance tasks.Its power consumption is 180 W W, providing a balance of power and efficiency.Launched in Q3/2018, it is built to handle demanding applications.

Differences

  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    35 left arrow score
  • More number of cores

    16 times more cores

    28 left arrow 12
  • Higher turbo clock speed

    Around 7% better overclocked clock speed

    4.60 GHz left arrow 4.30 GHz

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Intel Xeon W-3275M CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
    261 place
  • Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
    34 place
  • Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
    1 place
  • Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
    23 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    2 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    70 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    72 place
  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    192 left arrow score
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 29% better clock speed

    3.50 GHz left arrow 2.50 GHz
  • Performance per watt

    About 0.88 times less performance per watt

    180 W left arrow 205 W

Positions in all rankings

Common positions AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
    259 place
  • Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
    75 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    242 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    83 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    498 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    296 place
  • Monero Hashrate kH/s
    34 place
  • Blender 2.81 (bmw27)
    162 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    37 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    56 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    8 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    48 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    194 place

Specifications

Technical data
Intel Xeon W-3275M Intel Xeon W-3275M
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
CPU family and group

Comprehensive background on the processors being compared, detailing their series, generation, and targeted market segment.

  • Segment
    Desktop / Server left arrow Desktop / Server
  • Family
    Intel Xeon W left arrow AMD Ryzen
  • Generation
    7 left arrow 2
  • CPU group
    Intel Xeon W-2200/3200 left arrow AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2000
CPU Technical specs

Essential parameters including the number of cores, threads, base and turbo frequencies, and cache size. These metrics provide insight into the processor’s speed—higher values generally indicate better performance.

  • Frequency
    2.50 GHz left arrow 3.50 GHz
  • CPU Cores
    28 left arrow 12
  • Turbo (1 Core)
    4.60 GHz left arrow 4.30 GHz
  • CPU Threads
    56 left arrow 24
  • Hyperthreading
    Yes left arrow Yes
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow Yes
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow normal
IGPU

The integrated graphics (iGPU) do not influence the CPU performance significantly; they serve as a substitute for a dedicated graphics card in the absence of one or are utilized in mobile devices.

  • GPU name
    no iGPU left arrow no iGPU
  • GPU (Turbo)
    No turbo left arrow No turbo
Hardware codec support

This section details the built-in codecs used for encoding and decoding media content, which significantly enhance processing speed and efficiency.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h264
    No left arrow No
  • VP9
    No left arrow No
  • VP8
    No left arrow No
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • AVC
    No left arrow No
  • VC-1
    No left arrow No
  • JPEG
    No left arrow No
Memory specs & PCI

Overview of the types and quantities of RAM supported by AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X and Intel Xeon W-3275M. The supported memory frequencies may vary depending on the motherboard configuration.

  • Memory type
    DDR4-2933 left arrow DDR4-2933
  • Max. Memory
    2048 GB left arrow
  • ECC
    Yes left arrow Yes
  • Memory channels
    6 left arrow 4
  • PCIe version
    3.0 left arrow 3.0
  • PCIe lanes
    64 left arrow 64
Encryption
  • AES-NI
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Analyze the TDP (Thermal Design Power) requirements of Intel Xeon W-3275M and AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X to make an informed decision on the appropriate cooling system. Remember that TDP refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.

  • TDP (PL1)
    205 W left arrow 180 W
Technologies and extensions

Information on architecture, interfaces, and additional instructions supported by Intel Xeon W-3275M and AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X, including virtual machine technologies and fabrication processes.

  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • Virtualization
    VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d left arrow AMD-V, SVM
  • ISA extensions
    SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512 left arrow SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3
  • L3-Cache
    38.50 MB left arrow 32.00 MB
  • Architecture
    Cascade Lake W left arrow Colfax (Zen+)
  • Technology
    14 nm left arrow 12 nm
  • Socket
    LGA 3647 left arrow TR4 (SP3r2)
  • Release date
    Q2/2019 left arrow Q3/2018

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

By analyzing the results from various benchmarks, you can gain a clearer understanding of the performance differences between Intel Xeon W-3275M and AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.

Compare the synthetic benchmark scores and make an informed decision on the best processor for your needs!

Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R20 SC is a high load CPU test for long tasks on a desktop or notebook PC, uses one CPU core, with no hypetrading
437
Intel Xeon W-3275M
439
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R20 MC is a high load CPU test for long tasks on a desktop or notebook PC, using a multi-core and hyperthreading
11020
Intel Xeon W-3275M
5843
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 SC is a popular cross-platform performance test for desktop or mobile processors that uses system memory intensively
1096
Intel Xeon W-3275M
1042
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 MC is a popular cross-platform performance test for desktop or mobile processors that uses system memory intensively
17196
Intel Xeon W-3275M
8714
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
PassMark is a test suite that performs complex mathematical calculations to determine CPU performance on file compression, encryption and physics-related tasks
36622
Intel Xeon W-3275M
22020
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X

Latest comparisons