Vergleichen Sie Intel Xeon W-3275M VS AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X. Which processor delivers superior performance?
In this detailed comparison, we evaluate the specifications and benchmarks of both processors to determine the best choice for your needs. We analyze their core counts, maximum frequencies, and power consumption.
Intel Xeon W-3275M boasts a maximum frequency of 2.50 GHz GHz. 28 cores that enhance multitasking capabilities.With a power consumption of 205 W W, it ensures efficient performance.Freigegeben in Q2/2019, it incorporates the latest technology for optimal efficiency.
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X features a maximum frequency of 3.50 GHz GHz. 12 cores designed for high-performance tasks.Its power consumption is 180 W W, providing a balance of power and efficiency.Launched in Q3/2018, it is built to handle demanding applications.
Gründe für die Berücksichtigung Platz in der Gesamtwertung
(basierend auf mehreren Benchmarks)
score
Größere Anzahl von Kernen
16 Mehr Kerne
12
Höhere Turbotaktfrequenz
Rund um 7% bessere übertaktete taktrate
4.30 GHz
Gemeinsame Standpunkte Intel Xeon W-3275M CPU in gängigen Benchmarks, zum Vergleich mit anderen Modellen.
Gründe für die Berücksichtigung Platz in der Gesamtwertung
(basierend auf mehreren Benchmarks)
score
Höhere Taktfrequenz
Rund um 29% höhere taktfrequenz
2.50 GHz
Leistung pro Watt
About 0.88 weniger Wärmeentwicklung durch den Prozessor, W.
205 W
Gemeinsame Standpunkte AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X CPU in gängigen Benchmarks, zum Vergleich mit anderen Modellen.
Intel Xeon W-3275M
Comprehensive background on the processors being compared, detailing their series, generation, and targeted market segment.
Desktop / Server
AMD Ryzen
2
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2000
Essential parameters including the number of cores, threads, base and turbo frequencies, and cache size. These metrics provide insight into the processor’s speed—higher values generally indicate better performance.
3.50 GHz
12
4.30 GHz
24
Ja
Ja
normal
The integrated graphics (iGPU) do not influence the CPU performance significantly; they serve as a substitute for a dedicated graphics card in the absence of one or are utilized in mobile devices.
keine iGPU
kein Turbo
This section details the built-in codecs used for encoding and decoding media content, which significantly enhance processing speed and efficiency.
Nein
Nein
Nein
Nein
Nein
Nein
Nein
Nein
Nein
Overview of the types and quantities of RAM supported by AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X und Intel Xeon W-3275M. The supported memory frequencies may vary depending on the motherboard configuration.
DDR4-2933
Ja
4
3.0
64
Ja
Analyze the TDP (Thermal Design Power) requirements of Intel Xeon W-3275M und AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X to make an informed decision on the appropriate cooling system. Remember that TDP refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.
180 W
Information on architecture, interfaces, and additional instructions supported by Intel Xeon W-3275M und AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X, including virtual machine technologies and fabrication processes.
x86-64 (64 bit)
AMD-V, SVM
SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3
32.00 MB
Colfax (Zen+)
12 nm
TR4 (SP3r2)
Q3/2018
By analyzing the results from various benchmarks, you can gain a clearer understanding of the performance differences between Intel Xeon W-3275M und AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Compare the synthetic benchmark scores and make an informed decision on the best processor for your needs!
English
Russian
Portuguese
Italian
French
Japan
Spanish
Polish
Chinese
Korean
