AMD Epyc 7642
Intel Xeon W-3335
Videokarte 1 auswählen
Videokarte 2 auswählen

AMD Epyc 7642 gegen Intel Xeon W-3335. Spezifikationen, Leistung, Tests

Gesamtnote
star star star star star
Freigegeben
Q3/2019
AMD Epyc 7642
AMD Epyc 7642
Freigegeben
Q3/2021
Gesamtnote
star star star star star
Intel Xeon W-3335
Intel Xeon W-3335

Vergleichen Sie AMD Epyc 7642 VS Intel Xeon W-3335. Which processor delivers superior performance?

In this detailed comparison, we evaluate the specifications and benchmarks of both processors to determine the best choice for your needs. We analyze their core counts, maximum frequencies, and power consumption.

AMD Epyc 7642 boasts a maximum frequency of 2.30 GHz GHz. 48 cores that enhance multitasking capabilities.With a power consumption of 225 W W, it ensures efficient performance.Freigegeben in Q3/2019, it incorporates the latest technology for optimal efficiency.

Intel Xeon W-3335 features a maximum frequency of 3.40 GHz GHz. 16 / 32 cores designed for high-performance tasks.Its power consumption is 250 W W, providing a balance of power and efficiency.Launched in Q3/2021, it is built to handle demanding applications.

Unterschiede

AMD Epyc 7642 Gründe für die Berücksichtigung
AMD Epyc 7642
Einen Fehler melden
  • Größere Anzahl von Kernen

    32 Mehr Kerne

    48 left arrow 16
  • Leistung pro Watt

    weniger Wärmeentwicklung durch den Prozessor, W.

    225 W left arrow 250 W

Positionen in allen Ranglisten

Gemeinsame Standpunkte AMD Epyc 7642 CPU in gängigen Benchmarks, zum Vergleich mit anderen Modellen.

  • Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
    361 place
  • Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
    36 place
Intel Xeon W-3335 Gründe für die Berücksichtigung
Intel Xeon W-3335
Einen Fehler melden
  • Höhere Taktfrequenz

    Rund um 32% höhere taktfrequenz

    3.40 GHz left arrow 2.30 GHz
  • Höhere Turbotaktfrequenz

    Rund um 18 % bessere übertaktete taktrate

    4.00 GHz left arrow 3.30 GHz

Positionen in allen Ranglisten

Gemeinsame Standpunkte Intel Xeon W-3335 CPU in gängigen Benchmarks, zum Vergleich mit anderen Modellen.

No data

Specifications

Technische Daten
AMD Epyc 7642 AMD Epyc 7642
Intel Xeon W-3335 Intel Xeon W-3335
CPU-Familie und Gruppe

Comprehensive background on the processors being compared, detailing their series, generation, and targeted market segment.

  • Segment
    Desktop / Server left arrow Desktop / Server
  • Serie
    AMD Epyc left arrow Intel Xeon W
  • Generation
    2 left arrow 8
  • CPU Gruppe
    AMD Epyc 7002 left arrow Intel Xeon W-3300
  • Vergangenes Modell
    -- left arrow Intel Xeon W-3235
  • Successor
    AMD Epyc 7643 left arrow --
Technische Daten der CPU

Essential parameters including the number of cores, threads, base and turbo frequencies, and cache size. These metrics provide insight into the processor’s speed—higher values generally indicate better performance.

  • Frequenz
    2.30 GHz left arrow 3.40 GHz
  • CPU Kerne
    48 left arrow 16
  • Turbo (1 Kern)
    3.30 GHz left arrow 4.00 GHz
  • CPU Threads
    96 left arrow 32
  • Hyperthreading
    Ja left arrow Ja
  • Übertaktung
    Nein left arrow Nein
  • Zentrale Architektur
    normal left arrow normal
IGPU

The integrated graphics (iGPU) do not influence the CPU performance significantly; they serve as a substitute for a dedicated graphics card in the absence of one or are utilized in mobile devices.

  • GPU-Name
    keine iGPU left arrow keine iGPU
  • GPU frequency
    left arrow --
  • GPU (Turbo)
    kein Turbo left arrow kein Turbo
  • Ausführungseinheiten
    left arrow --
  • Shader
    left arrow --
  • Max. displays
    left arrow --
  • Generation
    left arrow --
  • DirectX Version
    left arrow --
  • technisches verfahren
    left arrow --
  • Datum der Veröffentlichung
    left arrow --
Hardware Codec Unterstützung

This section details the built-in codecs used for encoding and decoding media content, which significantly enhance processing speed and efficiency.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    Nein left arrow Nein
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    Nein left arrow Nein
  • h264
    Nein left arrow Nein
  • VP9
    Nein left arrow Nein
  • VP8
    Nein left arrow Nein
  • AV1
    Nein left arrow Nein
  • AVC
    Nein left arrow Nein
  • VC-1
    Nein left arrow Nein
  • JPEG
    Nein left arrow Nein
Speicherspezifikationen & PCI

Overview of the types and quantities of RAM supported by Intel Xeon W-3335 und AMD Epyc 7642. The supported memory frequencies may vary depending on the motherboard configuration.

  • Speicher Typ
    DDR4-3200 left arrow DDR4-3200
  • Max. Speicher
    left arrow 4096 GB
  • ECC
    Ja left arrow Ja
  • Speicherkanäle
    8 left arrow 8
  • PCIe-Version
    4.0 left arrow 4.0
  • PCIe-Lanes
    128 left arrow 64
Verschlüsselung
  • AES-NI
    Ja left arrow Ja
Energieverbrauch

Analyze the TDP (Thermal Design Power) requirements of AMD Epyc 7642 und Intel Xeon W-3335 to make an informed decision on the appropriate cooling system. Remember that TDP refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.

  • TDP (PL1)
    225 W left arrow 250 W
Technologien und Erweiterungen

Information on architecture, interfaces, and additional instructions supported by AMD Epyc 7642 und Intel Xeon W-3335, including virtual machine technologies and fabrication processes.

  • Befehlssatz (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • Virtualisierung
    AMD-V, SVM left arrow VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
  • ISA-Erweiterungen
    SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3 left arrow SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512
  • L2-Cache
    -- left arrow 20.00 MB
  • L3-Cache
    256.00 MB left arrow 24.00 MB
  • Architektur
    Rome (Zen 2) left arrow Ice Lake W
  • technisches verfahren
    7 nm left arrow 10 nm
  • Steckdose
    SP3 left arrow LGA 4189
  • Datum der Veröffentlichung
    Q3/2019 left arrow Q3/2021

Benchmarks (tests)

Leistungstests CPUs

By analyzing the results from various benchmarks, you can gain a clearer understanding of the performance differences between AMD Epyc 7642 und Intel Xeon W-3335.

Compare the synthetic benchmark scores and make an informed decision on the best processor for your needs!

Letzte Vergleiche