Seleccionar processador 1
Seleccionar processador 2
Matrox LUMA A310
NVIDIA A800 PCIe 80 GB

Matrox LUMA A310 versus NVIDIA A800 PCIe 80 GB. Especificações, desempenho, testes

Pontuação geral
star star star star star
Lançado
Q2/2023
Matrox LUMA A310
Matrox LUMA A310
Lançado
Q3/2022
Pontuação geral
star star star star star
NVIDIA A800 PCIe 80 GB
NVIDIA A800 PCIe 80 GB

Comparison of Matrox LUMA A310 e NVIDIA A800 PCIe 80 GB Now is the perfect time to figure out which graphics card delivers the highest performance, what sets them apart, and the reasons behind those differences.

In front of you is a detailed comparison between the Matrox LUMA A310 and the NVIDIA A800 PCIe 80 GB to assist you in selecting the best card for your needs, we will examine their specifications, benchmark scores, and overall performance, guiding you toward an informed decision.

Comparing the Matrox LUMA A310 to the NVIDIA A800 PCIe 80 GB analyzing performance in various popular benchmarks highlights the key differences between these models. By understanding the distinctions between these two cards, you’ll be able to choose the best option for your needs, whether you’re a gamer, content creator, or someone seeking pure processing power..

Matrox LUMA A310: boasts a maximum frequency of 2.000 GHz GHz + 6%. It is equipped with 4 GBGB of RAM. The memory type is GDDR6. It was released in Q2/2023.

NVIDIA A800 PCIe 80 GB: It has a maximum clock speed of 1.512 GHz GHz. It comes with 80 GBGB of memory. The memory type is HBM2e. Released in Q1 Q3/2022.

Diferenças

Videokards Razões a considerar
Matrox LUMA A310
Relatar um erro
  • Maior velocidade do relógio

    Por volta de 24% melhor velocidade do relógio

    2.000 GHz left arrow 1.512 GHz

Posições em todos os rankings

Posições comuns Matrox LUMA A310 GPU em referências populares, para comparação com outros modelos.

  • Shadow of the Tomb Raider
    2981 place
  • Mais memória

    95% mais memória

    80 GB left arrow 4 GB

Posições em todos os rankings

Posições comuns NVIDIA A800 PCIe 80 GB GPU em referências populares, para comparação com outros modelos.

  • Performance relative to other GPU chips
    8 place

Especificações

Dados técnicos
Matrox LUMA A310 Matrox LUMA A310
NVIDIA A800 PCIe 80 GB NVIDIA A800 PCIe 80 GB
General Information

This section provides a detailed comparison of the fundamental technical specifications of the graphics cards Matrox LUMA A310 e NVIDIA A800 PCIe 80 GB. It provides essential details like the GPU architecture, the number of processing units, and other key features that significantly influence the overall performance of the cards across different applications, including gaming and professional tasks..

  • Chip GPU
    ACM-G11 (Alchemist) left arrow GA100
  • Unidades de saída de renderização
    16 left arrow 160
  • Unidades de Textura
    32 left arrow 432
Memory Configuration

This section provides a comparison of the memory configurations of Matrox LUMA A310 e NVIDIA A800 PCIe 80 GB. It includes details such as the memory size, type (e.g., GDDR6, HBM2), and bandwidth, which are key factors that determine how efficiently the card handles large textures, data sets, and high-resolution tasks.Larger memory sizes are typically beneficial for demanding applications like 4K gaming and video editing.

  • Tamanho da memória
    4 GB left arrow 80 GB
  • Tipo de memória
    GDDR6 left arrow HBM2e
  • Memory Clock
    1.938 GHz left arrow 1.512 GHz
  • Скорость памяти
    15.5 Gbps left arrow 3 Gbps
  • Interface de memória
    64 bit left arrow 5120 bit
Frequência do relógio

This section focuses on comparing the clock speeds of Matrox LUMA A310 e NVIDIA A800 PCIe 80 GB. It covers both the base and boost clock speeds, which have a direct impact on GPU performance during demanding tasks. Higher clock speeds generally result in smoother frame rates in games and faster processing in compute-intensive applications..

  • Frequência de base
    2.000 GHz left arrow 1.065 GHz
  • Frequência máxima
    2.000 GHz left arrow 1.41 GHz
Consumo de energia

This section examines the thermal design of Matrox LUMA A310 e NVIDIA A800 PCIe 80 GB. It provides information on power consumption (in watts) and thermal output during normal use and overclocking. Effective thermal management is crucial for ensuring stable performance during extended gaming sessions or other intensive tasks..

  • TDP
    30 W-60 % left arrow 250 W
Technical Specifications

This section compares the technical specifications of Matrox LUMA A310 e NVIDIA A800 PCIe 80 GB. It highlights key features such as API support for DirectX, OpenGL, and Vulkan, which are crucial for running modern games and applications efficiently.These specifications ensure compatibility and optimal performance across a wide range of software environments.

  • Resolução máxima
    7680x4320 left arrow 3840x2160
  • DirectX
    12_2 (Ultimate) left arrow 12.2
Dimensões

This section compares the physical dimensions of Matrox LUMA A310 e NVIDIA A800 PCIe 80 GB. It covers the size, weight, and slot requirements, which are key factors in ensuring compatibility with your PC case, particularly for smaller or more compact setups..

  • Comprimento
    168 mm left arrow 267 mm
  • Width
    -- left arrow 112 mm
Additional Information

This section provides additional information about Matrox LUMA A310 e NVIDIA A800 PCIe 80 GB. It covers aspects such as release dates, interface compatibility, and other unique features that might not be covered in other sections.This helps users make a more informed decision about the suitability of each card for their specific use case.

  • Interface GPU
    PCIe 4.0 x 8 left arrow PCIe 4.0 x16
  • Data de lançamento
    Q2/2023 left arrow Q3/2022
  • Processo tecnológico
    6 nm left arrow 7 nm

Benchmarks

Testes de desempenho GPUs

By reviewing the results from several well-known benchmarks, you can more accurately assess the performance differences between Matrox LUMA A310 e NVIDIA A800 PCIe 80 GB.

Compare the synthetic benchmark results and select the best graphics card for your needs!

NVIDIA A800 PCIe 80 GB Performance relative to other GPU chips
153%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
136%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
100%
89%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
81%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080

Últimas comparações