Wybierz procesor 1
Wybierz procesor 2
Matrox LUMA A310
NVIDIA A800 PCIe 80 GB

Matrox LUMA A310 kontra NVIDIA A800 PCIe 80 GB. Specyfikacje, wydajność, testy

Wynik ogólny
star star star star star
Wydany
Q2/2023
Matrox LUMA A310
Matrox LUMA A310
Wydany
Q3/2022
Wynik ogólny
star star star star star
NVIDIA A800 PCIe 80 GB
NVIDIA A800 PCIe 80 GB

Comparison of Matrox LUMA A310 oraz NVIDIA A800 PCIe 80 GB Now is the perfect time to figure out which graphics card delivers the highest performance, what sets them apart, and the reasons behind those differences.

In front of you is a detailed comparison between the Matrox LUMA A310 and the NVIDIA A800 PCIe 80 GB to assist you in selecting the best card for your needs, we will examine their specifications, benchmark scores, and overall performance, guiding you toward an informed decision.

Comparing the Matrox LUMA A310 to the NVIDIA A800 PCIe 80 GB analyzing performance in various popular benchmarks highlights the key differences between these models. By understanding the distinctions between these two cards, you’ll be able to choose the best option for your needs, whether you’re a gamer, content creator, or someone seeking pure processing power..

Matrox LUMA A310: boasts a maximum frequency of 2.000 GHz GHz + 6%. It is equipped with 4 GBGB of RAM. The memory type is GDDR6. It was released in Q2/2023.

NVIDIA A800 PCIe 80 GB: It has a maximum clock speed of 1.512 GHz GHz. It comes with 80 GBGB of memory. The memory type is HBM2e. Released in Q1 Q3/2022.

Różnice

Videokards Powody do rozważenia
Matrox LUMA A310
Zgłoś błąd
  • Wyższa prędkość zegara

    Wokół 24% lepsza prędkość zegara

    2.000 GHz left arrow 1.512 GHz

Pozycje we wszystkich rankingach

Wspólne stanowiska Matrox LUMA A310 GPU w popularnych benchmarkach, dla porównania z innymi modelami.

  • Shadow of the Tomb Raider
    2981 place
  • Więcej pamięci

    95% więcej pamięci

    80 GB left arrow 4 GB

Pozycje we wszystkich rankingach

Wspólne stanowiska NVIDIA A800 PCIe 80 GB GPU w popularnych benchmarkach, dla porównania z innymi modelami.

  • Performance relative to other GPU chips
    8 place

Specyfikacje

Dane techniczne
Matrox LUMA A310 Matrox LUMA A310
NVIDIA A800 PCIe 80 GB NVIDIA A800 PCIe 80 GB
General Information

This section provides a detailed comparison of the fundamental technical specifications of the graphics cards Matrox LUMA A310 oraz NVIDIA A800 PCIe 80 GB. It provides essential details like the GPU architecture, the number of processing units, and other key features that significantly influence the overall performance of the cards across different applications, including gaming and professional tasks..

  • Układ GPU
    ACM-G11 (Alchemist) left arrow GA100
  • Jednostki wyjściowe renderingu
    16 left arrow 160
  • Jednostki tekstury
    32 left arrow 432
Memory Configuration

This section provides a comparison of the memory configurations of Matrox LUMA A310 oraz NVIDIA A800 PCIe 80 GB. It includes details such as the memory size, type (e.g., GDDR6, HBM2), and bandwidth, which are key factors that determine how efficiently the card handles large textures, data sets, and high-resolution tasks.Larger memory sizes are typically beneficial for demanding applications like 4K gaming and video editing.

  • Rozmiar pamięci
    4 GB left arrow 80 GB
  • Typ pamięci
    GDDR6 left arrow HBM2e
  • Memory Clock
    1.938 GHz left arrow 1.512 GHz
  • Szybkość pamięci
    15.5 Gbps left arrow 3 Gbps
  • Interfejs pamięci
    64 bit left arrow 5120 bit
Częstotliwość zegara

This section focuses on comparing the clock speeds of Matrox LUMA A310 oraz NVIDIA A800 PCIe 80 GB. It covers both the base and boost clock speeds, which have a direct impact on GPU performance during demanding tasks. Higher clock speeds generally result in smoother frame rates in games and faster processing in compute-intensive applications..

  • Częstotliwość podstawowa
    2.000 GHz left arrow 1.065 GHz
  • Maksymalna częstotliwość
    2.000 GHz left arrow 1.41 GHz
Zużycie energii

This section examines the thermal design of Matrox LUMA A310 oraz NVIDIA A800 PCIe 80 GB. It provides information on power consumption (in watts) and thermal output during normal use and overclocking. Effective thermal management is crucial for ensuring stable performance during extended gaming sessions or other intensive tasks..

  • TDP
    30 W-60 % left arrow 250 W
Technical Specifications

This section compares the technical specifications of Matrox LUMA A310 oraz NVIDIA A800 PCIe 80 GB. It highlights key features such as API support for DirectX, OpenGL, and Vulkan, which are crucial for running modern games and applications efficiently.These specifications ensure compatibility and optimal performance across a wide range of software environments.

  • Maks. rozdzielczość
    7680x4320 left arrow 3840x2160
  • DirectX
    12_2 (Ultimate) left arrow 12.2
Wymiary

This section compares the physical dimensions of Matrox LUMA A310 oraz NVIDIA A800 PCIe 80 GB. It covers the size, weight, and slot requirements, which are key factors in ensuring compatibility with your PC case, particularly for smaller or more compact setups..

  • Długość
    168 mm left arrow 267 mm
  • Width
    -- left arrow 112 mm
Additional Information

This section provides additional information about Matrox LUMA A310 oraz NVIDIA A800 PCIe 80 GB. It covers aspects such as release dates, interface compatibility, and other unique features that might not be covered in other sections.This helps users make a more informed decision about the suitability of each card for their specific use case.

  • Interfejs GPU
    PCIe 4.0 x 8 left arrow PCIe 4.0 x16
  • Data wydania
    Q2/2023 left arrow Q3/2022
  • Proces technologiczny
    6 nm left arrow 7 nm

Benchmarki

Badania eksploatacyjne GPUs

By reviewing the results from several well-known benchmarks, you can more accurately assess the performance differences between Matrox LUMA A310 oraz NVIDIA A800 PCIe 80 GB.

Compare the synthetic benchmark results and select the best graphics card for your needs!

NVIDIA A800 PCIe 80 GB Performance relative to other GPU chips
153%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
136%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080
100%
89%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
81%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080

Najnowsze porównania