Comparar AMD A8-3800 VS Intel Core i3-3240. Which processor delivers superior performance?
In this detailed comparison, we evaluate the specifications and benchmarks of both processors to determine the best choice for your needs. We analyze their core counts, maximum frequencies, and power consumption.
AMD A8-3800 boasts a maximum frequency of 2.40 GHz GHz. 4 cores that enhance multitasking capabilities.With a power consumption of 65 W W, it ensures efficient performance.Lançado em Q3/2011, it incorporates the latest technology for optimal efficiency.
Intel Core i3-3240 features a maximum frequency of 3.40 GHz GHz. 2 cores designed for high-performance tasks.Its power consumption is 55 W W, providing a balance of power and efficiency.Launched in Q3/2012, it is built to handle demanding applications.
Razões a considerar Lugar na classificação geral
(com base em vários pontos de referência)
score
Mais número de núcleos
2 Mais núcleos
2
Posições comuns AMD A8-3800 CPU em padrões de referência populares, para comparação com outros modelos.
Razões a considerar Lugar na classificação geral
(com base em vários pontos de referência)
score
Maior velocidade do relógio
Por volta de 29% melhor velocidade do relógio
2.40 GHz
Desempenho por watt
About 0.85 menos calor gerado pelo processador, W.
65 W
Posições comuns Intel Core i3-3240 CPU em padrões de referência populares, para comparação com outros modelos.
AMD A8-3800
Comprehensive background on the processors being compared, detailing their series, generation, and targeted market segment.
Desktop / Server
Intel Core i3
3
Intel Core i 3000
Essential parameters including the number of cores, threads, base and turbo frequencies, and cache size. These metrics provide insight into the processor’s speed—higher values generally indicate better performance.
3.40 GHz
2
Sem turbo
4
Sim
Não
normal
The integrated graphics (iGPU) do not influence the CPU performance significantly; they serve as a substitute for a dedicated graphics card in the absence of one or are utilized in mobile devices.
Intel HD Graphics 2500
0.65 GHz
1.05 GHz
6
48
--
3
7
11.0
22 nm
Q2/2012
This section details the built-in codecs used for encoding and decoding media content, which significantly enhance processing speed and efficiency.
Não
Não
Decode / Encode
Não
Não
Não
Decode / Encode
Decode
Decode
Overview of the types and quantities of RAM supported by Intel Core i3-3240 e AMD A8-3800. The supported memory frequencies may vary depending on the motherboard configuration.
DDR3-1600
Não
2
Sim
Analyze the TDP (Thermal Design Power) requirements of AMD A8-3800 e Intel Core i3-3240 to make an informed decision on the appropriate cooling system. Remember that TDP refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.
55 W
Information on architecture, interfaces, and additional instructions supported by AMD A8-3800 e Intel Core i3-3240, including virtual machine technologies and fabrication processes.
x86-64 (64 bit)
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX
3.00 MB
Ivy Bridge S
22 nm
LGA 1155
Q3/2012
By analyzing the results from various benchmarks, you can gain a clearer understanding of the performance differences between AMD A8-3800 e Intel Core i3-3240.
Compare the synthetic benchmark scores and make an informed decision on the best processor for your needs!
English
Russian
German
Italian
French
Japan
Spanish
Polish
Chinese
Korean
