AMD A8-3800
Intel Core i3-3240
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

AMD A8-3800 vs Intel Core i3-3240. Specifications, performance, tests

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q3/2011
AMD A8-3800
AMD A8-3800
Released
Q3/2012
Overall score
star star star star star
Intel Core i3-3240
Intel Core i3-3240

Compare AMD A8-3800 VS Intel Core i3-3240. Which processor delivers superior performance?

In this detailed comparison, we evaluate the specifications and benchmarks of both processors to determine the best choice for your needs. We analyze their core counts, maximum frequencies, and power consumption.

AMD A8-3800 boasts a maximum frequency of 2.40 GHz GHz. 4 cores that enhance multitasking capabilities.With a power consumption of 65 W W, it ensures efficient performance.Released in Q3/2011, it incorporates the latest technology for optimal efficiency.

Intel Core i3-3240 features a maximum frequency of 3.40 GHz GHz. 2 cores designed for high-performance tasks.Its power consumption is 55 W W, providing a balance of power and efficiency.Launched in Q3/2012, it is built to handle demanding applications.

Differences

AMD A8-3800 Reasons to consider
AMD A8-3800
Report a bug
  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    1347 left arrow score
  • More number of cores

    2 times more cores

    4 left arrow 2

Positions in all rankings

Common positions AMD A8-3800 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    1279 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    1166 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    627 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    767 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    645 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    657 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)
    171 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    1063 place
  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    1272 left arrow score
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 29% better clock speed

    3.40 GHz left arrow 2.40 GHz
  • Performance per watt

    About 0.85 times less performance per watt

    55 W left arrow 65 W

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Intel Core i3-3240 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    728 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    723 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    1037 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    1174 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    1563 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    517 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    569 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    89 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    494 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)
    352 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    898 place

Specifications

Technical data
AMD A8-3800 AMD A8-3800
Intel Core i3-3240 Intel Core i3-3240
CPU family and group

Comprehensive background on the processors being compared, detailing their series, generation, and targeted market segment.

  • Segment
    Desktop / Server left arrow Desktop / Server
  • Family
    AMD A left arrow Intel Core i3
  • Generation
    1 left arrow 3
  • CPU group
    AMD A8-3000 left arrow Intel Core i 3000
CPU Technical specs

Essential parameters including the number of cores, threads, base and turbo frequencies, and cache size. These metrics provide insight into the processor’s speed—higher values generally indicate better performance.

  • Frequency
    2.40 GHz left arrow 3.40 GHz
  • CPU Cores
    4 left arrow 2
  • Turbo (1 Core)
    2.70 GHz left arrow No turbo
  • CPU Threads
    4 left arrow 4
  • Hyperthreading
    No left arrow Yes
  • Overclocking
    Yes left arrow No
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow normal
IGPU

The integrated graphics (iGPU) do not influence the CPU performance significantly; they serve as a substitute for a dedicated graphics card in the absence of one or are utilized in mobile devices.

  • GPU name
    AMD Radeon HD 6550D left arrow Intel HD Graphics 2500
  • GPU frequency
    0.60 GHz left arrow 0.65 GHz
  • GPU (Turbo)
    No turbo left arrow 1.05 GHz
  • Execution units
    5 left arrow 6
  • Shader
    400 left arrow 48
  • Max. GPU Memory
    1 GB left arrow --
  • Max. displays
    2 left arrow 3
  • Generation
    3 left arrow 7
  • DirectX Version
    11 left arrow 11.0
  • Technology
    32 nm left arrow 22 nm
  • Release date
    Q2/2011 left arrow Q2/2012
Hardware codec support

This section details the built-in codecs used for encoding and decoding media content, which significantly enhance processing speed and efficiency.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h264
    Decode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP9
    No left arrow No
  • VP8
    No left arrow No
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • AVC
    Decode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VC-1
    Decode left arrow Decode
  • JPEG
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode
Memory specs & PCI

Overview of the types and quantities of RAM supported by Intel Core i3-3240 and AMD A8-3800. The supported memory frequencies may vary depending on the motherboard configuration.

  • Memory type
    DDR3-1600 left arrow DDR3-1600
  • ECC
    No left arrow No
  • Memory channels
    2 left arrow 2
Encryption
  • AES-NI
    No left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Analyze the TDP (Thermal Design Power) requirements of AMD A8-3800 and Intel Core i3-3240 to make an informed decision on the appropriate cooling system. Remember that TDP refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.

  • TDP (PL1)
    65 W left arrow 55 W
Technologies and extensions

Information on architecture, interfaces, and additional instructions supported by AMD A8-3800 and Intel Core i3-3240, including virtual machine technologies and fabrication processes.

  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • Virtualization
    AMD-V left arrow VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
  • ISA extensions
    SSE3, SSE4a left arrow SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX
  • L3-Cache
    4.00 MB left arrow 3.00 MB
  • Architecture
    Llano (K10) left arrow Ivy Bridge S
  • Technology
    32 nm left arrow 22 nm
  • Socket
    FM1 left arrow LGA 1155
  • Release date
    Q3/2011 left arrow Q3/2012

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

By analyzing the results from various benchmarks, you can gain a clearer understanding of the performance differences between AMD A8-3800 and Intel Core i3-3240.

Compare the synthetic benchmark scores and make an informed decision on the best processor for your needs!

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The performance of the iGPU - the internal GPU in games
480
AMD A8-3800
101
Intel Core i3-3240
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 SC for one CPU core, includes stress tests simulating real 3D scenarios for Windows, Mac, Linux, Ansroid, iOS
1355
AMD A8-3800
2648
Intel Core i3-3240
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 MC using a multi-core and hyperthreading, includes stress tests simulating real 3D scenarios for Windows, Mac, Linux, Ansroid, iOS
4738
AMD A8-3800
5576
Intel Core i3-3240
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
The PC CPU and GPU test involves rendering a specific 3D scene in multi-core mode and hyperthreading, based on CINEMA 4D
2.91
AMD A8-3800
3.41
Intel Core i3-3240
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)
The iGPU test involves rendering a specific 3D scene, based on CINEMA 4D
24.6
AMD A8-3800
10.8
Intel Core i3-3240
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
PassMark is a test suite that performs complex mathematical calculations to determine CPU performance on file compression, encryption and physics-related tasks
3188
AMD A8-3800
4531
Intel Core i3-3240

Latest comparisons