AMD FX-4200
AMD A10-6700
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

AMD FX-4200 vs AMD A10-6700. Specifications, performance, tests

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q2/2012
AMD FX-4200
AMD FX-4200
Released
Q2/2013
Overall score
star star star star star
AMD A10-6700
AMD A10-6700

Compare AMD FX-4200 VS AMD A10-6700. Which processor delivers superior performance?

In this detailed comparison, we evaluate the specifications and benchmarks of both processors to determine the best choice for your needs. We analyze their core counts, maximum frequencies, and power consumption.

AMD FX-4200 boasts a maximum frequency of 3.30 GHz GHz. 4 cores that enhance multitasking capabilities.With a power consumption of 125 W W, it ensures efficient performance.Released in Q2/2012, it incorporates the latest technology for optimal efficiency.

AMD A10-6700 features a maximum frequency of 3.70 GHz GHz. 4 cores designed for high-performance tasks.Its power consumption is 65 W W, providing a balance of power and efficiency.Launched in Q2/2013, it is built to handle demanding applications.

Differences

AMD FX-4200 Reasons to consider
AMD FX-4200
Report a bug
  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    1506 left arrow score

Positions in all rankings

Common positions AMD FX-4200 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    1232 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    1199 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    660 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    571 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    918 place
AMD A10-6700 Reasons to consider
AMD A10-6700
Report a bug
  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    1265 left arrow score
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 11% better clock speed

    3.70 GHz left arrow 3.30 GHz
  • Performance per watt

    About 0.52 times less performance per watt

    65 W left arrow 125 W

Positions in all rankings

Common positions AMD A10-6700 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    963 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    804 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    1094 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    1130 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    543 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    591 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    522 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    370 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    464 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    872 place

Specifications

Technical data
AMD FX-4200 AMD FX-4200
AMD A10-6700 AMD A10-6700
CPU family and group

Comprehensive background on the processors being compared, detailing their series, generation, and targeted market segment.

  • Segment
    Desktop / Server left arrow Desktop / Server
  • Family
    AMD FX left arrow AMD A
  • Generation
    1 left arrow 3
  • CPU group
    AMD FX-4100/4200 left arrow AMD A10-6000
CPU Technical specs

Essential parameters including the number of cores, threads, base and turbo frequencies, and cache size. These metrics provide insight into the processor’s speed—higher values generally indicate better performance.

  • Frequency
    3.30 GHz left arrow 3.70 GHz
  • CPU Cores
    4 left arrow 4
  • Turbo (1 Core)
    No turbo left arrow 4.30 GHz
  • CPU Threads
    4 left arrow 4
  • Turbo (4 Cores)
    No turbo left arrow 4.30 GHz
  • Hyperthreading
    No left arrow No
  • Overclocking
    Yes left arrow No
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow normal
IGPU

The integrated graphics (iGPU) do not influence the CPU performance significantly; they serve as a substitute for a dedicated graphics card in the absence of one or are utilized in mobile devices.

  • GPU name
    no iGPU left arrow AMD Radeon HD 8670D
  • GPU frequency
    left arrow 0.84 GHz
  • GPU (Turbo)
    No turbo left arrow No turbo
  • Execution units
    left arrow 6
  • Shader
    left arrow 384
  • Max. GPU Memory
    -- left arrow 2 GB
  • Max. displays
    left arrow 2
  • Generation
    left arrow 5
  • DirectX Version
    left arrow 11.2
  • Technology
    left arrow 32 nm
  • Release date
    left arrow Q2/2013
Hardware codec support

This section details the built-in codecs used for encoding and decoding media content, which significantly enhance processing speed and efficiency.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h264
    No left arrow Decode
  • VP9
    No left arrow No
  • VP8
    No left arrow No
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • AVC
    No left arrow Decode
  • VC-1
    No left arrow Decode
  • JPEG
    No left arrow Decode / Encode
Memory specs & PCI

Overview of the types and quantities of RAM supported by AMD A10-6700 and AMD FX-4200. The supported memory frequencies may vary depending on the motherboard configuration.

  • Memory type
    DDR3-1866 left arrow DDR3-1866
  • ECC
    Yes left arrow No
  • Memory channels
    2 left arrow 2
Encryption
  • AES-NI
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Analyze the TDP (Thermal Design Power) requirements of AMD FX-4200 and AMD A10-6700 to make an informed decision on the appropriate cooling system. Remember that TDP refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.

  • TDP (PL1)
    125 W left arrow 65 W
Technologies and extensions

Information on architecture, interfaces, and additional instructions supported by AMD FX-4200 and AMD A10-6700, including virtual machine technologies and fabrication processes.

  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • Virtualization
    AMD-V left arrow AMD-V
  • ISA extensions
    SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX left arrow SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, FMA3, FMA4
  • L3-Cache
    8.00 MB left arrow 4.00 MB
  • Architecture
    Zambezi (Bulldozer) left arrow Richland (Piledriver)
  • Technology
    32 nm left arrow 32 nm
  • Socket
    AM3+ left arrow FM2
  • Release date
    Q2/2012 left arrow Q2/2013

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

By analyzing the results from various benchmarks, you can gain a clearer understanding of the performance differences between AMD FX-4200 and AMD A10-6700.

Compare the synthetic benchmark scores and make an informed decision on the best processor for your needs!

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 SC is a popular cross-platform performance test for desktop or mobile processors that uses system memory intensively
406
AMD FX-4200
533
AMD A10-6700
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 MC is a popular cross-platform performance test for desktop or mobile processors that uses system memory intensively
1287
AMD FX-4200
1431
AMD A10-6700
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 SC for one CPU core, includes stress tests simulating real 3D scenarios for Windows, Mac, Linux, Ansroid, iOS
1869
AMD FX-4200
2140
AMD A10-6700
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 MC using a multi-core and hyperthreading, includes stress tests simulating real 3D scenarios for Windows, Mac, Linux, Ansroid, iOS
5557
AMD FX-4200
6147
AMD A10-6700
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
PassMark is a test suite that performs complex mathematical calculations to determine CPU performance on file compression, encryption and physics-related tasks
4395
AMD FX-4200
4736
AMD A10-6700

Latest comparisons