AMD A6-3400M
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

AMD A6-3400M vs Intel Atom x5-Z8350. Specifications, performance, tests

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q2/2011
AMD A6-3400M
AMD A6-3400M
Released
Q1/2016
Overall score
star star star star star
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
Intel Atom x5-Z8350

Compare AMD A6-3400M VS Intel Atom x5-Z8350. Which processor delivers superior performance?

In this detailed comparison, we evaluate the specifications and benchmarks of both processors to determine the best choice for your needs. We analyze their core counts, maximum frequencies, and power consumption.

AMD A6-3400M boasts a maximum frequency of 1.40 GHz GHz. 4 cores that enhance multitasking capabilities.With a power consumption of 35 W W, it ensures efficient performance.Released in Q2/2011, it incorporates the latest technology for optimal efficiency.

Intel Atom x5-Z8350 features a maximum frequency of 1.44 GHz GHz. 4 cores designed for high-performance tasks.Its power consumption is 2 W W, providing a balance of power and efficiency.Launched in Q1/2016, it is built to handle demanding applications.

Differences

AMD A6-3400M Reasons to consider
AMD A6-3400M
Report a bug
  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    1697 left arrow score
  • Higher turbo clock speed

    Around 17% better overclocked clock speed

    2.30 GHz left arrow 1.92 GHz

Positions in all rankings

Common positions AMD A6-3400M CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    1402 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    1422 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    1226 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    861 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    811 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    723 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    1222 place
  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    1462 left arrow score
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 3% better clock speed

    1.44 GHz left arrow 1.40 GHz
  • Performance per watt

    About 0.06 times less performance per watt

    2 W left arrow 35 W

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Intel Atom x5-Z8350 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
    402 place
  • Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
    385 place
  • Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
    592 place
  • Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
    529 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    1059 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    1021 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    1440 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    1488 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    1557 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    617 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    691 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)
    342 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    1268 place

Specifications

Technical data
AMD A6-3400M AMD A6-3400M
Intel Atom x5-Z8350 Intel Atom x5-Z8350
CPU family and group

Comprehensive background on the processors being compared, detailing their series, generation, and targeted market segment.

  • Segment
    Mobile left arrow Mobile
  • Family
    AMD A left arrow Intel Atom
  • Generation
    1 left arrow 1
  • CPU group
    AMD A6-3000M left arrow Intel Atom x3/x5/x7
CPU Technical specs

Essential parameters including the number of cores, threads, base and turbo frequencies, and cache size. These metrics provide insight into the processor’s speed—higher values generally indicate better performance.

  • Frequency
    1.40 GHz left arrow 1.44 GHz
  • CPU Cores
    4 left arrow 4
  • Turbo (1 Core)
    2.30 GHz left arrow 1.92 GHz
  • CPU Threads
    4 left arrow 4
  • Turbo (4 Cores)
    2.30 GHz left arrow 1.92 GHz
  • Hyperthreading
    No left arrow No
  • Overclocking
    Yes left arrow No
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow normal
IGPU

The integrated graphics (iGPU) do not influence the CPU performance significantly; they serve as a substitute for a dedicated graphics card in the absence of one or are utilized in mobile devices.

  • GPU name
    AMD Radeon HD 6520G left arrow Intel HD Graphics 400
  • GPU frequency
    0.40 GHz left arrow 0.20 GHz
  • GPU (Turbo)
    No turbo left arrow 0.50 GHz
  • Execution units
    5 left arrow 12
  • Shader
    320 left arrow 96
  • Max. GPU Memory
    1 GB left arrow 8 GB
  • Max. displays
    2 left arrow 3
  • Generation
    3 left arrow 8
  • DirectX Version
    11 left arrow 12
  • Technology
    32 nm left arrow 14 nm
  • Release date
    Q2/2011 left arrow Q1/2015
Hardware codec support

This section details the built-in codecs used for encoding and decoding media content, which significantly enhance processing speed and efficiency.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h264
    Decode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP9
    No left arrow No
  • VP8
    No left arrow Decode
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • AVC
    Decode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VC-1
    Decode left arrow Decode
  • JPEG
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode
Memory specs & PCI

Overview of the types and quantities of RAM supported by Intel Atom x5-Z8350 and AMD A6-3400M. The supported memory frequencies may vary depending on the motherboard configuration.

  • Memory type
    DDR3-1333 left arrow DDR3L-1600 SO-DIMM
  • Max. Memory
    left arrow 2 GB
  • ECC
    No left arrow No
  • Memory channels
    2 left arrow 1
  • PCIe version
    left arrow 2.0
  • PCIe lanes
    left arrow 1
Encryption
  • AES-NI
    No left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Analyze the TDP (Thermal Design Power) requirements of AMD A6-3400M and Intel Atom x5-Z8350 to make an informed decision on the appropriate cooling system. Remember that TDP refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.

  • TDP (PL1)
    35 W left arrow 2 W
Technologies and extensions

Information on architecture, interfaces, and additional instructions supported by AMD A6-3400M and Intel Atom x5-Z8350, including virtual machine technologies and fabrication processes.

  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • Virtualization
    AMD-V left arrow VT-x, VT-x EPT
  • ISA extensions
    SSE3, SSE4a left arrow SSE4.1, SSE4.2
  • L3-Cache
    4.00 MB left arrow 2.00 MB
  • Architecture
    Llano (K10) left arrow Cherry Trail
  • Technology
    32 nm left arrow 14 nm
  • Socket
    FS1 left arrow BGA 592
  • Release date
    Q2/2011 left arrow Q1/2016

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

By analyzing the results from various benchmarks, you can gain a clearer understanding of the performance differences between AMD A6-3400M and Intel Atom x5-Z8350.

Compare the synthetic benchmark scores and make an informed decision on the best processor for your needs!

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 SC is a popular cross-platform performance test for desktop or mobile processors that uses system memory intensively
234
AMD A6-3400M
171
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 MC is a popular cross-platform performance test for desktop or mobile processors that uses system memory intensively
726
AMD A6-3400M
533
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The performance of the iGPU - the internal GPU in games
256
AMD A6-3400M
105
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
The PC CPU and GPU test involves rendering a specific 3D scene in multi-core mode and hyperthreading, based on CINEMA 4D
1.78
AMD A6-3400M
1.43
Intel Atom x5-Z8350
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
PassMark is a test suite that performs complex mathematical calculations to determine CPU performance on file compression, encryption and physics-related tasks
1964
AMD A6-3400M
1672
Intel Atom x5-Z8350

Latest comparisons