AMD EPYC 9654
Intel Core i9-13900K
Videokarte 1 auswählen
Videokarte 2 auswählen

AMD EPYC 9654 gegen Intel Core i9-13900K. Spezifikationen, Leistung, Tests

Gesamtnote
star star star star star
Freigegeben
Q4/2022
AMD EPYC 9654
AMD EPYC 9654
Freigegeben
Q4/2022
Gesamtnote
star star star star star
Intel Core i9-13900K
Intel Core i9-13900K

Vergleichen Sie AMD EPYC 9654 VS Intel Core i9-13900K. Which processor delivers superior performance?

In this detailed comparison, we evaluate the specifications and benchmarks of both processors to determine the best choice for your needs. We analyze their core counts, maximum frequencies, and power consumption.

AMD EPYC 9654 boasts a maximum frequency of 2.40 GHz GHz. 96 / 192 cores that enhance multitasking capabilities.With a power consumption of 360 W W, it ensures efficient performance.Freigegeben in Q4/2022, it incorporates the latest technology for optimal efficiency.

Intel Core i9-13900K features a maximum frequency of 3.80 GHz GHz. 24 cores designed for high-performance tasks.Its power consumption is 125 W W, providing a balance of power and efficiency.Launched in Q4/2022, it is built to handle demanding applications.

Unterschiede

AMD EPYC 9654 Gründe für die Berücksichtigung
AMD EPYC 9654
Einen Fehler melden
  • Platz in der Gesamtwertung

    (basierend auf mehreren Benchmarks)

    77 left arrow score
  • Größere Anzahl von Kernen

    72 Mehr Kerne

    96 left arrow 24

Positionen in allen Ranglisten

Gemeinsame Standpunkte AMD EPYC 9654 CPU in gängigen Benchmarks, zum Vergleich mit anderen Modellen.

  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    212 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    2 place
  • Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
    149 place
  • Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
    6 place
Intel Core i9-13900K Gründe für die Berücksichtigung
Intel Core i9-13900K
Einen Fehler melden
  • Platz in der Gesamtwertung

    (basierend auf mehreren Benchmarks)

    12 left arrow score
  • Höhere Taktfrequenz

    Rund um 37% höhere taktfrequenz

    3.80 GHz left arrow 2.40 GHz
  • Leistung pro Watt

    About 0.35 weniger Wärmeentwicklung durch den Prozessor, W.

    125 W left arrow 360 W

Positionen in allen Ranglisten

Gemeinsame Standpunkte Intel Core i9-13900K CPU in gängigen Benchmarks, zum Vergleich mit anderen Modellen.

  • Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
    2 place
  • Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
    12 place
  • Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
    13 place
  • Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
    10 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    9 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    5 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    18 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    32 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    355 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    20 place
  • CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (Single-Core)
    2 place
  • CPU-Z Benchmark 17 (Multi-Core)
    5 place
  • Blender 3.1 Benchmark
    5 place

Specifications

Technische Daten
AMD EPYC 9654 AMD EPYC 9654
Intel Core i9-13900K Intel Core i9-13900K
CPU-Familie und Gruppe

Comprehensive background on the processors being compared, detailing their series, generation, and targeted market segment.

  • Serie
    AMD EPYC left arrow Intel Core i9
  • CPU Gruppe
    AMD EPYC 9004 left arrow Intel Core i 13000
  • Segment
    Desktop / Server left arrow Desktop / Server
  • Generation
    4 left arrow 13
  • Vergangenes Modell
    -- left arrow Intel Core i9-12900K
  • Successor
    -- left arrow Nein
Technische Daten der CPU

Essential parameters including the number of cores, threads, base and turbo frequencies, and cache size. These metrics provide insight into the processor’s speed—higher values generally indicate better performance.

  • Zentrale Architektur
    normal left arrow hybrid
  • Übertaktung
    Nein left arrow Nein
  • Frequenz
    2.40 GHz left arrow 3.80 GHz
IGPU

The integrated graphics (iGPU) do not influence the CPU performance significantly; they serve as a substitute for a dedicated graphics card in the absence of one or are utilized in mobile devices.

  • GPU-Name
    keine iGPU left arrow Intel Iris Xe Graphics 32
  • GPU frequency
    left arrow 0.40 GHz
  • GPU (Turbo)
    kein Turbo left arrow 1.45 GHz
  • Ausführungseinheiten
    left arrow 32
  • Shader
    left arrow 256
  • Max. GPU Memory
    -- left arrow 16 GB
  • Max. displays
    left arrow 4
  • Generation
    left arrow 12
  • technisches verfahren
    left arrow 10 nm
  • Datum der Veröffentlichung
    left arrow Q4/2022
Hardware Codec Unterstützung

This section details the built-in codecs used for encoding and decoding media content, which significantly enhance processing speed and efficiency.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    Nein left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    Nein left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h264
    Nein left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP8
    Nein left arrow Decode
  • VP9
    Nein left arrow Decode / Encode
  • AV1
    Nein left arrow Decode
  • AVC
    Nein left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VC-1
    Nein left arrow Decode
  • JPEG
    Nein left arrow Decode / Encode
Speicherspezifikationen & PCI

Overview of the types and quantities of RAM supported by Intel Core i9-13900K und AMD EPYC 9654. The supported memory frequencies may vary depending on the motherboard configuration.

  • Speicher Typ
    DDR5-4800 left arrow DDR5-5600
  • Max. Speicher
    6144 GB left arrow 128 GB
  • Speicherkanäle
    12 left arrow 2
  • Bandwidth
    461.0 GB/s left arrow 89.6 GB/s
  • ECC
    Ja left arrow Ja
  • PCIe
    5.0 x 128 left arrow 5.0 x 20
Energieverbrauch

Analyze the TDP (Thermal Design Power) requirements of AMD EPYC 9654 und Intel Core i9-13900K to make an informed decision on the appropriate cooling system. Remember that TDP refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.

  • TDP (PL1)
    360 W left arrow 125 W
  • TDP (PL2)
    -- left arrow 241 W
  • TDP up
    400 W left arrow Nein
  • TDP down
    320 W left arrow Nein
  • Maximale Temperatur
    100 °C left arrow 100 °C
Technologien und Erweiterungen

Information on architecture, interfaces, and additional instructions supported by AMD EPYC 9654 und Intel Core i9-13900K, including virtual machine technologies and fabrication processes.

  • technisches verfahren
    5 nm left arrow 10 nm
  • Steckdose
    SP5 left arrow LGA 1700
  • L2-Cache
    96.00 MB left arrow 32.00 MB
  • L3-Cache
    384.00 MB left arrow 36.00 MB
  • Architektur
    Genoa (Zen 4) left arrow Raptor Lake S
  • Virtualisierung
    AMD-V, SVM left arrow VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
  • Befehlssatz (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • ISA-Erweiterungen
    SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512, BFLOAT16, VNNI left arrow SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX2+
  • Datum der Veröffentlichung
    Q4/2022 left arrow Q4/2022

Benchmarks (tests)

Leistungstests CPUs

By analyzing the results from various benchmarks, you can gain a clearer understanding of the performance differences between AMD EPYC 9654 und Intel Core i9-13900K.

Compare the synthetic benchmark scores and make an informed decision on the best processor for your needs!

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 SC ist ein beliebter plattformübergreifender Leistungstest für Desktop- oder Mobilprozessoren, der den Systemspeicher intensiv nutzt.
846
AMD EPYC 9654
2147
Intel Core i9-13900K
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 MC ist ein beliebter plattformübergreifender Leistungstest für Desktop- oder Mobilprozessoren, der den Systemspeicher intensiv nutzt.
68024
AMD EPYC 9654
23982
Intel Core i9-13900K

Letzte Vergleiche