比较 Intel Xeon D-1649N VS Intel Atom C3750. Which processor delivers superior performance?
In this detailed comparison, we evaluate the specifications and benchmarks of both processors to determine the best choice for your needs. We analyze their core counts, maximum frequencies, and power consumption.
Intel Xeon D-1649N boasts a maximum frequency of 2.30 GHz GHz. 8 / 16 cores that enhance multitasking capabilities.With a power consumption of 45 W W, it ensures efficient performance.发布于 Q2/2019, it incorporates the latest technology for optimal efficiency.
Intel Atom C3750 features a maximum frequency of 2.20 GHz GHz. 8 cores designed for high-performance tasks.Its power consumption is 21 W W, providing a balance of power and efficiency.Launched in Q3/2017, it is built to handle demanding applications.
需要考虑的原因 更高的时钟速度
左右 4% 更好的时钟速度
2.20 GHz
更高的涡轮增压时钟速度
左右 20% 更好的超频时钟速度
2.40 GHz
共同立场 Intel Xeon D-1649N 在流行的基准测试中的CPU，用于与其他型号进行比较.
No data
需要考虑的原因 每瓦特性能
About 0.47 处理器产生的热量更少，W。
45 W
共同立场 Intel Atom C3750 在流行的基准测试中的CPU，用于与其他型号进行比较.
No data
Intel Xeon D-1649N
Comprehensive background on the processors being compared, detailing their series, generation, and targeted market segment.
Intel Atom
Intel Atom C3000
Desktop / Server
2
Essential parameters including the number of cores, threads, base and turbo frequencies, and cache size. These metrics provide insight into the processor’s speed—higher values generally indicate better performance.
normal
没有
2.20 GHz
The integrated graphics (iGPU) do not influence the CPU performance significantly; they serve as a substitute for a dedicated graphics card in the absence of one or are utilized in mobile devices.
没有iGPU
没有涡轮增压
This section details the built-in codecs used for encoding and decoding media content, which significantly enhance processing speed and efficiency.
没有
没有
没有
没有
没有
没有
没有
没有
没有
Overview of the types and quantities of RAM supported by Intel Atom C3750 和 Intel Xeon D-1649N. The supported memory frequencies may vary depending on the motherboard configuration.
DDR4-2133
256 GB
2
是
Analyze the TDP (Thermal Design Power) requirements of Intel Xeon D-1649N 和 Intel Atom C3750 to make an informed decision on the appropriate cooling system. Remember that TDP refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.
21 W
100 °C
Information on architecture, interfaces, and additional instructions supported by Intel Xeon D-1649N 和 Intel Atom C3750, including virtual machine technologies and fabrication processes.
x86-64 (64 bit)
SSE4.1, SSE4.2
16.00 MB
Denverton
14 nm
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
BGA 1310
Q3/2017
By analyzing the results from various benchmarks, you can gain a clearer understanding of the performance differences between Intel Xeon D-1649N 和 Intel Atom C3750.
Compare the synthetic benchmark scores and make an informed decision on the best processor for your needs!
English
Russian
German
Portuguese
Italian
French
Japan
Spanish
Polish
Korean
