Intel Celeron N3160
Intel Celeron N3350
选择视频卡1
选择视频卡2

Intel Celeron N3160 对 Intel Celeron N3350. 规格、性能、测试

总分
star star star star star
已发布
Q1/2016
Intel Celeron N3160
Intel Celeron N3160
已发布
Q3/2016
总分
star star star star star
Intel Celeron N3350
Intel Celeron N3350

比较 Intel Celeron N3160 VS Intel Celeron N3350. Which processor delivers superior performance?

In this detailed comparison, we evaluate the specifications and benchmarks of both processors to determine the best choice for your needs. We analyze their core counts, maximum frequencies, and power consumption.

Intel Celeron N3160 boasts a maximum frequency of 1.60 GHz GHz. 4 cores that enhance multitasking capabilities.With a power consumption of 6 W W, it ensures efficient performance.发布于 Q1/2016, it incorporates the latest technology for optimal efficiency.

Intel Celeron N3350 features a maximum frequency of 1.10 GHz GHz. 2 cores designed for high-performance tasks.Its power consumption is 6 W W, providing a balance of power and efficiency.Launched in Q3/2016, it is built to handle demanding applications.

差异

  • 在总排名中的位置

    (基于几个基准)

    1483 left arrow score
  • 更高的时钟速度

    左右 31% 更好的时钟速度

    1.60 GHz left arrow 1.10 GHz
  • 更多的核心数量

    2 更多的核心

    4 left arrow 2

所有排名中的位置

共同立场 Intel Celeron N3160 在流行的基准测试中的CPU,用于与其他型号进行比较.

  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    1043 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    998 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    1417 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    1434 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    1480 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    839 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    775 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    804 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    738 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)
    307 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    1224 place
  • Geekbench 6 (Single-Core)
    290 place
  • Geekbench 6 (Multi-Core)
    300 place
  • 在总排名中的位置

    (基于几个基准)

    1444 left arrow score
  • 更高的涡轮增压时钟速度

    左右 7 超频后的时钟速度提高了%

    2.40 GHz left arrow 2.24 GHz

所有排名中的位置

共同立场 Intel Celeron N3350 在流行的基准测试中的CPU,用于与其他型号进行比较.

  • Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
    401 place
  • Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
    386 place
  • Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
    579 place
  • Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
    528 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    1015 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    1035 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    1344 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    1485 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    1494 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    795 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    856 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    801 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    762 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)
    225 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    1311 place

规格

技术数据
Intel Celeron N3160 Intel Celeron N3160
Intel Celeron N3350 Intel Celeron N3350
CPU家族和团体

Comprehensive background on the processors being compared, detailing their series, generation, and targeted market segment.

  • 分段
    Mobile left arrow Mobile
  • 系列
    Intel Celeron left arrow Intel Celeron
  • 一代人
    8 left arrow 8
  • CPU组
    Intel Celeron J3000/N3000 left arrow Intel Celeron J3000/N3000
CPU技术规格

Essential parameters including the number of cores, threads, base and turbo frequencies, and cache size. These metrics provide insight into the processor’s speed—higher values generally indicate better performance.

  • 頻率
    1.60 GHz left arrow 1.10 GHz
  • CPU核数
    4 left arrow 2
  • 涡轮增压 (1核)
    2.24 GHz left arrow 2.40 GHz
  • CPU线程
    4 left arrow 2
  • 超线程
    没有 left arrow 没有
  • 超频
    没有 left arrow 没有
  • 核心架构
    normal left arrow normal
IGPU

The integrated graphics (iGPU) do not influence the CPU performance significantly; they serve as a substitute for a dedicated graphics card in the absence of one or are utilized in mobile devices.

  • GPU名称
    Intel HD Graphics 400 left arrow Intel HD Graphics 500
  • GPU frequency
    0.32 GHz left arrow 0.20 GHz
  • GPU (Turbo)
    0.64 GHz left arrow 0.65 GHz
  • 执行单位
    12 left arrow 12
  • 着色器
    96 left arrow 96
  • Max. GPU Memory
    8 GB left arrow 8 GB
  • Max. displays
    3 left arrow 3
  • 一代人
    8 left arrow 9
  • DirectX Version
    12 left arrow 12
  • 技术过程
    14 nm left arrow 14 nm
  • 发布日期
    Q1/2015 left arrow Q3/2016
硬件编解码器支持

This section details the built-in codecs used for encoding and decoding media content, which significantly enhance processing speed and efficiency.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    没有 left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    没有 left arrow Decode
  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP9
    没有 left arrow Decode
  • VP8
    Decode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • AV1
    没有 left arrow 没有
  • AVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VC-1
    Decode left arrow Decode
  • JPEG
    Decode left arrow Decode / Encode
内存规格和PCI

Overview of the types and quantities of RAM supported by Intel Celeron N3350 和 Intel Celeron N3160. The supported memory frequencies may vary depending on the motherboard configuration.

  • 存储器类型
    DDR3L-1600 SO-DIMM left arrow DDR3-1866DDR4-2400
  • 最大内存
    left arrow 8 GB
  • ECC
    没有 left arrow 没有
  • 记忆通道
    2 left arrow 2
  • PCIe版本
    2.0 left arrow 2.0
  • PCIe通道
    4 left arrow 6
加密
  • AES-NI
    left arrow
能源消耗

Analyze the TDP (Thermal Design Power) requirements of Intel Celeron N3160 和 Intel Celeron N3350 to make an informed decision on the appropriate cooling system. Remember that TDP refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.

  • TDP (PL1)
    6 W left arrow 6 W
技术和扩展

Information on architecture, interfaces, and additional instructions supported by Intel Celeron N3160 和 Intel Celeron N3350, including virtual machine technologies and fabrication processes.

  • 指令集(ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • 虚拟化
    VT-x, VT-x EPT left arrow VT-x, VT-x EPT
  • ISA扩展
    SSE4.1, SSE4.2 left arrow SSE4.1, SSE4.2
  • L2-Cache
    2.00 MB left arrow 2.00 MB
  • 建筑学
    Braswell left arrow Braswell
  • 技术过程
    14 nm left arrow 14 nm
  • 插座
    BGA 1170 left arrow BGA 1296
  • 发布日期
    Q1/2016 left arrow Q3/2016

基准

性能测试 CPUs

By analyzing the results from various benchmarks, you can gain a clearer understanding of the performance differences between Intel Celeron N3160 和 Intel Celeron N3350.

Compare the synthetic benchmark scores and make an informed decision on the best processor for your needs!

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
Cinebench R15 SC对台式电脑或笔记本电脑的计算模块施加压力,使其达到极限,并准确确定硬件的关键性能参数。
38
Intel Celeron N3160
48
Intel Celeron N3350
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
Cinebench R15 MC对台式电脑或笔记本电脑的计算模块施加压力,使其达到极限,并准确确定硬件的关键性能参数。
136
Intel Celeron N3160
89
Intel Celeron N3350
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 SC是一个流行的跨平台性能测试,适用于密集使用系统内存的桌面或移动处理器。
210
Intel Celeron N3160
293
Intel Celeron N3350
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 MC是一个流行的跨平台性能测试,适用于密集使用系统内存的桌面或移动处理器。
709
Intel Celeron N3160
539
Intel Celeron N3350
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
iGPU的性能--游戏中的内部GPU
134
Intel Celeron N3160
125
Intel Celeron N3350
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
一个CPU核心的Geekbench 3 SC,包括模拟真实3D场景的压力测试,适用于Windows、Mac、Linux、Ansroid、iOS。
943
Intel Celeron N3160
1210
Intel Celeron N3350
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 MC使用多核和超线程,包括模拟Windows、Mac、Linux、Ansroid、iOS的真实3D场景的压力测试。
3161
Intel Celeron N3160
2088
Intel Celeron N3350
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
PC CPU和GPU测试涉及在单核模式下渲染一个特定的3D场景,基于CINEMA 4D
0.44
Intel Celeron N3160
0.57
Intel Celeron N3350
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
The PC CPU and GPU test involves rendering a specific 3D scene in multi-core mode and hyperthreading, based on CINEMA 4D
1.67
Intel Celeron N3160
1.09
Intel Celeron N3350
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)
iGPU测试涉及渲染一个特定的3D场景,基于CINEMA 4D
13.3
Intel Celeron N3160
18.2
Intel Celeron N3350
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
PassMark是一个测试套件,执行复杂的数学计算,以确定文件压缩、加密和物理相关任务的CPU性能。
1950
Intel Celeron N3160
1287
Intel Celeron N3350

最新比较