Comparar Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G VS Apple A11 Bionic. Which processor delivers superior performance?
In this detailed comparison, we evaluate the specifications and benchmarks of both processors to determine the best choice for your needs. We analyze their core counts, maximum frequencies, and power consumption.
Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G boasts a maximum frequency of 1.80 GHz GHz. 8 / 8 cores that enhance multitasking capabilities.With a power consumption of 5 W W, it ensures efficient performance.Lançado em Q3/2020, it incorporates the latest technology for optimal efficiency.
Apple A11 Bionic features a maximum frequency of 1.42 GHz GHz. 6 cores designed for high-performance tasks.Its power consumption is 8 W W, providing a balance of power and efficiency.Launched in Q3/2017, it is built to handle demanding applications.
Razões a considerar Lugar na classificação geral
(com base em vários pontos de referência)
score
Maior velocidade do relógio
Por volta de 21% melhor velocidade do relógio
1.42 GHz
Mais número de núcleos
2 Mais núcleos
6
Maior velocidade do relógio turbo
Por volta de 15% melhor velocidade de relógio overclock
2.39 GHz
Desempenho por watt
menos calor gerado pelo processador, W.
8 W
Posições comuns Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G CPU em padrões de referência populares, para comparação com outros modelos.
Razões a considerar Lugar na classificação geral
(com base em vários pontos de referência)
score
Posições comuns Apple A11 Bionic CPU em padrões de referência populares, para comparação com outros modelos.
Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G
Comprehensive background on the processors being compared, detailing their series, generation, and targeted market segment.
Apple A series
Apple A11
Mobile
11
Apple A10 Fusion
Apple A12 Bionic
Essential parameters including the number of cores, threads, base and turbo frequencies, and cache size. These metrics provide insight into the processor’s speed—higher values generally indicate better performance.
hybrid (big.LITTLE)
1.42 GHz
2.39 GHz
Não
Não
The integrated graphics (iGPU) do not influence the CPU performance significantly; they serve as a substitute for a dedicated graphics card in the absence of one or are utilized in mobile devices.
Apple A11
1.42 GHz
2.39 GHz
3
0
3 GB
1
8
10 nm
Q3/2017
This section details the built-in codecs used for encoding and decoding media content, which significantly enhance processing speed and efficiency.
Decode
Decode
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
Decode
Não
Decode
Decode
Decode / Encode
Overview of the types and quantities of RAM supported by Apple A11 Bionic e Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G. The supported memory frequencies may vary depending on the motherboard configuration.
LPDDR4X-4266
16 GB
1
Não
Analyze the TDP (Thermal Design Power) requirements of Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G e Apple A11 Bionic to make an informed decision on the appropriate cooling system. Remember that TDP refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.
8 W
Information on architecture, interfaces, and additional instructions supported by Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G e Apple A11 Bionic, including virtual machine technologies and fabrication processes.
x86-64 (64 bit)
8.00 MB
--
A11
10 nm
None
N/A
Q3/2017
--
By analyzing the results from various benchmarks, you can gain a clearer understanding of the performance differences between Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G e Apple A11 Bionic.
Compare the synthetic benchmark scores and make an informed decision on the best processor for your needs!
English
Russian
German
Italian
French
Japan
Spanish
Polish
Chinese
Korean
