Comparison of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 oraz Matrox LUMA A380 Now is the perfect time to figure out which graphics card delivers the highest performance, what sets them apart, and the reasons behind those differences.
In front of you is a detailed comparison between the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 and the Matrox LUMA A380 to assist you in selecting the best card for your needs, we will examine their specifications, benchmark scores, and overall performance, guiding you toward an informed decision.
Comparing the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 to the Matrox LUMA A380 analyzing performance in various popular benchmarks highlights the key differences between these models. By understanding the distinctions between these two cards, you’ll be able to choose the best option for your needs, whether you’re a gamer, content creator, or someone seeking pure processing power..
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090: boasts a maximum frequency of 2.235 GHz GHz + 6%. It is equipped with 24 GBGB of RAM. The memory type is GDDR6X. It was released in Q4/2022.
Matrox LUMA A380: It has a maximum clock speed of 2.000 GHz-11 % GHz. It comes with 6 GBGB of memory. The memory type is GDDR6. Released in Q1 Q2/2023.
Powody do rozważenia Wyższa prędkość zegara
Wokół 11% lepsza prędkość zegara
2.000 GHz-11 %
Więcej pamięci
75% więcej pamięci
6 GB
Wspólne stanowiska NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 GPU w popularnych benchmarkach, dla porównania z innymi modelami.
No data
Powody do rozważenia Wspólne stanowiska Matrox LUMA A380 GPU w popularnych benchmarkach, dla porównania z innymi modelami.
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
This section provides a detailed comparison of the fundamental technical specifications of the graphics cards NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 oraz Matrox LUMA A380. It provides essential details like the GPU architecture, the number of processing units, and other key features that significantly influence the overall performance of the cards across different applications, including gaming and professional tasks..
Intel Arc A380 Graphics
ACM-G11 (Alchemist)
128
1024
32
64
8
This section provides a comparison of the memory configurations of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 oraz Matrox LUMA A380. It includes details such as the memory size, type (e.g., GDDR6, HBM2), and bandwidth, which are key factors that determine how efficiently the card handles large textures, data sets, and high-resolution tasks.Larger memory sizes are typically beneficial for demanding applications like 4K gaming and video editing.
6 GB
GDDR6
1.938 GHz
15.5 Gbps
186 GB/s
96 bit
This section focuses on comparing the clock speeds of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 oraz Matrox LUMA A380. It covers both the base and boost clock speeds, which have a direct impact on GPU performance during demanding tasks. Higher clock speeds generally result in smoother frame rates in games and faster processing in compute-intensive applications..
2.000 GHz-11 %
2.050 GHz
--
Tak
This section examines the thermal design of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 oraz Matrox LUMA A380. It provides information on power consumption (in watts) and thermal output during normal use and overclocking. Effective thermal management is crucial for ensuring stable performance during extended gaming sessions or other intensive tasks..
75 W (Reference)
--
--
1 x 8-Pin
This section compares the cooling systems of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 oraz Matrox LUMA A380. It includes details about the types of coolers (e.g., blower or open-air) and the number and size of fans, which play a crucial role in maintaining optimal temperatures during operation.Effective cooling is essential for preventing thermal throttling and extending the longevity of the GPU.
Radial
1 x 70 mm
--
Air cooling
0 dB / Silent
0 dB
This section compares the connectivity options available on NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 oraz Matrox LUMA A380. This includes details on the number and types of ports, such as HDMI, DisplayPort, and others, which are crucial for connecting monitors and external devices..This information assists in identifying which card provides more flexible or up-to-date connectivity features..
4
--
--
4x DP v2.1
--
--
--
This section compares the technical specifications of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 oraz Matrox LUMA A380. It highlights key features such as API support for DirectX, OpenGL, and Vulkan, which are crucial for running modern games and applications efficiently.These specifications ensure compatibility and optimal performance across a wide range of software environments.
7680x4320
12_2 (Ultimate)
Tak
Tak
No LED lighting
This section compares the support for video codecs on NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 oraz Matrox LUMA A380. It highlights the built-in capabilities for compressing and decompressing video formats such as H.264, H.265 (HEVC), and VP9, which are important for tasks like video editing and streaming.
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
Nie
Decode / Encode
Decode / Encode
This section compares the physical dimensions of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 oraz Matrox LUMA A380. It covers the size, weight, and slot requirements, which are key factors in ensuring compatibility with your PC case, particularly for smaller or more compact setups..
254 mm
127 mm
--
1 PCIe-Slots
--
This section provides additional information about NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 oraz Matrox LUMA A380. It covers aspects such as release dates, interface compatibility, and other unique features that might not be covered in other sections.This helps users make a more informed decision about the suitability of each card for their specific use case.
PCIe 4.0 x 8
Q2/2023
--
6 nm
--
data sheet
By reviewing the results from several well-known benchmarks, you can more accurately assess the performance differences between NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 oraz Matrox LUMA A380.
Compare the synthetic benchmark results and select the best graphics card for your needs!
English
Russian
German
Portuguese
Italian
French
Japan
Spanish
Chinese
Korean
