Porównaj AMD A8-3530MX VS Intel Celeron 3755U. Which processor delivers superior performance?
In this detailed comparison, we evaluate the specifications and benchmarks of both processors to determine the best choice for your needs. We analyze their core counts, maximum frequencies, and power consumption.
AMD A8-3530MX boasts a maximum frequency of 1.90 GHz GHz. 4 cores that enhance multitasking capabilities.With a power consumption of 45 W W, it ensures efficient performance.Wydany w Q2/2011, it incorporates the latest technology for optimal efficiency.
Intel Celeron 3755U features a maximum frequency of 1.70 GHz GHz. 2 cores designed for high-performance tasks.Its power consumption is 15 W W, providing a balance of power and efficiency.Launched in Q1/2015, it is built to handle demanding applications.
Powody do rozważenia Miejsce w rankingu ogólnym
(w oparciu o kilka benchmarków)
score
Wyższa prędkość zegara
Wokół 11% lepsza prędkość zegara
1.70 GHz
Większa liczba rdzeni
2 Więcej rdzeni
2
Wspólne stanowiska AMD A8-3530MX Procesor w popularnych benchmarkach, dla porównania z innymi modelami.
Powody do rozważenia Miejsce w rankingu ogólnym
(w oparciu o kilka benchmarków)
score
Wydajność na wat
About 0.33 mniej ciepła wytwarzanego przez procesor, W.
45 W
Wspólne stanowiska Intel Celeron 3755U Procesor w popularnych benchmarkach, dla porównania z innymi modelami.
AMD A8-3530MX
Comprehensive background on the processors being compared, detailing their series, generation, and targeted market segment.
Mobile
Intel Celeron
7
Intel Celeron 3000
Essential parameters including the number of cores, threads, base and turbo frequencies, and cache size. These metrics provide insight into the processor’s speed—higher values generally indicate better performance.
1.70 GHz
2
No turbo
2
Nie
Nie
normal
The integrated graphics (iGPU) do not influence the CPU performance significantly; they serve as a substitute for a dedicated graphics card in the absence of one or are utilized in mobile devices.
Intel HD Graphics (Broadwell GT1)
0.10 GHz
0.80 GHz
12
96
8 GB
3
8
11.2
14 nm
Q1/2015
This section details the built-in codecs used for encoding and decoding media content, which significantly enhance processing speed and efficiency.
Nie
Nie
Decode / Encode
Nie
Decode
Nie
Decode / Encode
Decode
Decode
Overview of the types and quantities of RAM supported by Intel Celeron 3755U oraz AMD A8-3530MX. The supported memory frequencies may vary depending on the motherboard configuration.
DDR3-1600
Nie
2
2.0
12
Tak
Analyze the TDP (Thermal Design Power) requirements of AMD A8-3530MX oraz Intel Celeron 3755U to make an informed decision on the appropriate cooling system. Remember that TDP refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.
15 W
Information on architecture, interfaces, and additional instructions supported by AMD A8-3530MX oraz Intel Celeron 3755U, including virtual machine technologies and fabrication processes.
x86-64 (64 bit)
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
SSE4.1, SSE4.2
2.00 MB
Kaby Lake U
14 nm
BGA 1168
Q1/2015
By analyzing the results from various benchmarks, you can gain a clearer understanding of the performance differences between AMD A8-3530MX oraz Intel Celeron 3755U.
Compare the synthetic benchmark scores and make an informed decision on the best processor for your needs!
English
Russian
German
Portuguese
Italian
French
Japan
Spanish
Chinese
Korean
