Porównaj AMD A10-9700 VS Elbrus-4S. Which processor delivers superior performance?
In this detailed comparison, we evaluate the specifications and benchmarks of both processors to determine the best choice for your needs. We analyze their core counts, maximum frequencies, and power consumption.
AMD A10-9700 boasts a maximum frequency of 3.50 GHz GHz. 4 cores that enhance multitasking capabilities.With a power consumption of 65 W W, it ensures efficient performance.Wydany w Q3/2017, it incorporates the latest technology for optimal efficiency.
Elbrus-4S features a maximum frequency of 0.8 GHz GHz. 4 cores designed for high-performance tasks.Launched in Q4/2014, it is built to handle demanding applications.
Powody do rozważenia Miejsce w rankingu ogólnym
(w oparciu o kilka benchmarków)
score
Wyższa prędkość zegara
Wokół 77% lepsza prędkość zegara
0.8 GHz
Wspólne stanowiska AMD A10-9700 Procesor w popularnych benchmarkach, dla porównania z innymi modelami.
Powody do rozważenia Wspólne stanowiska Elbrus-4S Procesor w popularnych benchmarkach, dla porównania z innymi modelami.
No data
AMD A10-9700
Comprehensive background on the processors being compared, detailing their series, generation, and targeted market segment.
Desktop
Elbrus
Elbrus-4
Essential parameters including the number of cores, threads, base and turbo frequencies, and cache size. These metrics provide insight into the processor’s speed—higher values generally indicate better performance.
0.8 GHz
4
4
Overview of the types and quantities of RAM supported by Elbrus-4S oraz AMD A10-9700. The supported memory frequencies may vary depending on the motherboard configuration.
DDR3-1600
Analyze the TDP (Thermal Design Power) requirements of AMD A10-9700 oraz Elbrus-4S to make an informed decision on the appropriate cooling system. Remember that TDP refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.
45 W
Information on architecture, interfaces, and additional instructions supported by AMD A10-9700 oraz Elbrus-4S, including virtual machine technologies and fabrication processes.
8 MB
65 nm
HFCBGA 1600
Q4/2014
By analyzing the results from various benchmarks, you can gain a clearer understanding of the performance differences between AMD A10-9700 oraz Elbrus-4S.
Compare the synthetic benchmark scores and make an informed decision on the best processor for your needs!
English
Russian
German
Portuguese
Italian
French
Japan
Spanish
Chinese
Korean
