ロセッサー1を選択
ロセッサー2を選択
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada
Intel Arc A350M

NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada 対 Intel Arc A350M. 仕様・性能・テスト

総合得点
star star star star star
発売済み
Q4/2022
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada
発売済み
Q2/2022
総合得点
star star star star star
Intel Arc A350M
Intel Arc A350M

Comparison of NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada と Intel Arc A350M Now is the perfect time to figure out which graphics card delivers the highest performance, what sets them apart, and the reasons behind those differences.

In front of you is a detailed comparison between the NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada and the Intel Arc A350M to assist you in selecting the best card for your needs, we will examine their specifications, benchmark scores, and overall performance, guiding you toward an informed decision.

Comparing the NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada to the Intel Arc A350M analyzing performance in various popular benchmarks highlights the key differences between these models. By understanding the distinctions between these two cards, you’ll be able to choose the best option for your needs, whether you’re a gamer, content creator, or someone seeking pure processing power..

NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada: boasts a maximum frequency of 2.0 GHz GHz + 6%. It is equipped with 48 GBGB of RAM. The memory type is GDDR6. It was released in Q4/2022.

Intel Arc A350M: It has a maximum clock speed of 0.3 GHz GHz. It comes with 4 GBGB of memory. The memory type is GDDR6. Released in Q1 Q2/2022.

相違点

  • クロックの高速化

    周辺 85% クロックスピードの向上

    2.0 GHz left arrow 0.3 GHz
  • その他のメモリ

    92メモリ増量

    48 GB left arrow 4 GB

全ランキングでの順位

共通ポジション NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada 他機種との比較のため、一般的なベンチマークでGPUを使用。.

  • Performance relative to other GPU chips
    10 place

全ランキングでの順位

共通ポジション Intel Arc A350M 他機種との比較のため、一般的なベンチマークでGPUを使用。.

  • Performance relative to other GPU chips
    33 place

仕様

技術データ
NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada
Intel Arc A350M Intel Arc A350M
General Information

This section provides a detailed comparison of the fundamental technical specifications of the graphics cards NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada と Intel Arc A350M. It provides essential details like the GPU architecture, the number of processing units, and other key features that significantly influence the overall performance of the cards across different applications, including gaming and professional tasks..

  • GPUチップ
    AD102 left arrow DG2-128 / Alchemist
  • 実行部隊
    18176 left arrow 768
  • レンダリング出力単位
    192 left arrow 24
  • テクスチャユニット
    568 left arrow 48
  • L1 Cache
    128 KB left arrow いいえ
  • L2 Cache
    96 MB left arrow 4 MB
  • RT Cores
    142 left arrow 6
Memory Configuration

This section provides a comparison of the memory configurations of NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada と Intel Arc A350M. It includes details such as the memory size, type (e.g., GDDR6, HBM2), and bandwidth, which are key factors that determine how efficiently the card handles large textures, data sets, and high-resolution tasks.Larger memory sizes are typically beneficial for demanding applications like 4K gaming and video editing.

  • メモリサイズ
    48 GB left arrow 4 GB
  • メモリータイプ
    GDDR6 left arrow GDDR6
  • Memory Clock
    2.0 GHz left arrow 1.75 GHz
  • メモリ速度
    16 Gbps left arrow 14 Gbps
  • メモリ帯域
    768.0 GB/s left arrow 112.0 GB/s
  • メモリーインターフェース
    384 bit left arrow 64 bit
クロック周波数

This section focuses on comparing the clock speeds of NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada と Intel Arc A350M. It covers both the base and boost clock speeds, which have a direct impact on GPU performance during demanding tasks. Higher clock speeds generally result in smoother frame rates in games and faster processing in compute-intensive applications..

  • 基本周波数
    2.175 GHz left arrow 0.3 GHz
  • 最大周波数
    2.535 GHz left arrow 1.15 GHz
エネルギー消費量

This section examines the thermal design of NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada と Intel Arc A350M. It provides information on power consumption (in watts) and thermal output during normal use and overclocking. Effective thermal management is crucial for ensuring stable performance during extended gaming sessions or other intensive tasks..

  • TDP
    300 W left arrow 25 W
  • Power Connectors
    1x 16-pin left arrow いいえ
  • Slot
    Dual-slot left arrow IGP
Technical Specifications

This section compares the technical specifications of NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada と Intel Arc A350M. It highlights key features such as API support for DirectX, OpenGL, and Vulkan, which are crucial for running modern games and applications efficiently.These specifications ensure compatibility and optimal performance across a wide range of software environments.

  • 最大解像度
    3840x2160 left arrow 2560x1440
  • DirectX
    12.2 left arrow 12.2
  • OpenGL
    4.6 left arrow 4.6
  • OpenCL
    3.0 left arrow 3.0
  • Vulkan
    1.3 left arrow 1.3
  • Shader Model
    6.7 left arrow 6.6
Additional Information

This section provides additional information about NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada と Intel Arc A350M. It covers aspects such as release dates, interface compatibility, and other unique features that might not be covered in other sections.This helps users make a more informed decision about the suitability of each card for their specific use case.

  • 建築
    Ada Lovelace left arrow Xe HPG / Generation 12.7
  • 技術プロセス
    4 nm left arrow 6 nm
  • 発売日
    Q4/2022 left arrow Q2/2022
Theoretical Performance

  • Pixel Rate
    486.7 GPixel/s left arrow 27.60 GPixel/s
  • Texture Rate
    1,440 GTexel/s left arrow 55.20 GTexel/s
  • FP16 (half)
    92.15 TFLOPS (1:1) left arrow 3.533 TFLOPS
  • FP32 (float)
    92.15 TFLOPS left arrow 1.766 TFLOPS
  • FP64 (double)
    1,440 GFLOPS (1:64) left arrow 441.6 GFLOPS

ベンチマーク

性能試験 GPUs

By reviewing the results from several well-known benchmarks, you can more accurately assess the performance differences between NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada と Intel Arc A350M.

Compare the synthetic benchmark results and select the best graphics card for your needs!

NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada Performance relative to other GPU chips
100%
91%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
72%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080
51%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
39%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
Intel Arc A350M Performance relative to other GPU chips
218%
GeForce GTX 960
164%
GeForce GTX 660
120%
GeForce GTX 470
100%
93%
GeForce GTX 460

最新の比較