比較する AMD E-300 VS AMD E-350. Which processor delivers superior performance?
In this detailed comparison, we evaluate the specifications and benchmarks of both processors to determine the best choice for your needs. We analyze their core counts, maximum frequencies, and power consumption.
AMD E-300 boasts a maximum frequency of 1.30 GHz GHz. 2 cores that enhance multitasking capabilities.With a power consumption of 18 W W, it ensures efficient performance.で発売されました。 Q3/2011, it incorporates the latest technology for optimal efficiency.
AMD E-350 features a maximum frequency of 1.60 GHz GHz. 2 cores designed for high-performance tasks.Its power consumption is 18 W W, providing a balance of power and efficiency.Launched in Q1/2011, it is built to handle demanding applications.
総合ランキングの順位
(複数のベンチマークに基づく)
score
共通ポジション AMD E-300 他機種との比較のため、一般的なベンチマークでCPUを比較。.
総合ランキングの順位
(複数のベンチマークに基づく)
score
クロックの高速化
周辺 19% クロックスピードの向上
1.30 GHz
共通ポジション AMD E-350 他機種との比較のため、一般的なベンチマークでCPUを比較。.
AMD E-300
Comprehensive background on the processors being compared, detailing their series, generation, and targeted market segment.
Mobile
AMD E
1
AMD E/E1/E2-1000
Essential parameters including the number of cores, threads, base and turbo frequencies, and cache size. These metrics provide insight into the processor’s speed—higher values generally indicate better performance.
1.60 GHz
2
ターボなし
2
ターボなし
いいえ
いいえ
normal
The integrated graphics (iGPU) do not influence the CPU performance significantly; they serve as a substitute for a dedicated graphics card in the absence of one or are utilized in mobile devices.
AMD Radeon HD 6310
0.49 GHz
ターボなし
1
80
1 GB
2
3
11
40 nm
Q4/2010
This section details the built-in codecs used for encoding and decoding media content, which significantly enhance processing speed and efficiency.
いいえ
いいえ
Decode
いいえ
いいえ
いいえ
Decode
Decode
Decode / Encode
Overview of the types and quantities of RAM supported by AMD E-350 と AMD E-300. The supported memory frequencies may vary depending on the motherboard configuration.
DDR3-1066
いいえ
1
はい
Analyze the TDP (Thermal Design Power) requirements of AMD E-300 と AMD E-350 to make an informed decision on the appropriate cooling system. Remember that TDP refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.
18 W
Information on architecture, interfaces, and additional instructions supported by AMD E-300 と AMD E-350, including virtual machine technologies and fabrication processes.
x86-64 (64 bit)
AMD-V
SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX
1.00 MB
Zacate (Bobcat)
32 nm
BGA 413
Q1/2011
By analyzing the results from various benchmarks, you can gain a clearer understanding of the performance differences between AMD E-300 と AMD E-350.
Compare the synthetic benchmark scores and make an informed decision on the best processor for your needs!
English
Russian
German
Portuguese
Italian
French
Spanish
Polish
Chinese
Korean
