Intel Atom C3958
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v4
Seleziona la scheda video 1
Seleziona la scheda video 2

Intel Atom C3958 contro Intel Xeon E5-2697 v4. Specifiche, prestazioni, test

Punteggio complessivo
star star star star star
Rilasciato
Q3/2017
Intel Atom C3958
Intel Atom C3958
Rilasciato
Q1/2016
Punteggio complessivo
star star star star star
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v4
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v4

Confronta Intel Atom C3958 VS Intel Xeon E5-2697 v4. Which processor delivers superior performance?

In this detailed comparison, we evaluate the specifications and benchmarks of both processors to determine the best choice for your needs. We analyze their core counts, maximum frequencies, and power consumption.

Intel Atom C3958 boasts a maximum frequency of 2.00 GHz GHz. 16 cores that enhance multitasking capabilities.With a power consumption of 31 W W, it ensures efficient performance.Rilasciato in Q3/2017, it incorporates the latest technology for optimal efficiency.

Intel Xeon E5-2697 v4 features a maximum frequency of 2.30 GHz GHz. 18 cores designed for high-performance tasks.Its power consumption is 145 W W, providing a balance of power and efficiency.Launched in Q1/2016, it is built to handle demanding applications.

Differenze

Intel Atom C3958 Motivi da considerare
Intel Atom C3958
Segnala un bug
  • Prestazioni per watt

    meno calore generato dal processore, W.

    31 W left arrow 145 W

Posizioni in tutte le classifiche

Posizioni comuni Intel Atom C3958 CPU in benchmark popolari, per un confronto con altri modelli.

No data
  • Posizione nella classifica generale

    (sulla base di diversi parametri di riferimento)

    504 left arrow score
  • Velocità di clock più alta

    Intorno a 13% migliore velocità di clock

    2.30 GHz left arrow 2.00 GHz
  • Più numero di core

    About 1.13 Più core

    18 left arrow 16

Posizioni in tutte le classifiche

Posizioni comuni Intel Xeon E5-2697 v4 CPU in benchmark popolari, per un confronto con altri modelli.

  • Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
    496 place
  • Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
    85 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    440 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    77 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    872 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    278 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    100 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    20 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    551 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    35 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    203 place

Specifiche

Dati tecnici
Intel Atom C3958 Intel Atom C3958
Intel Xeon E5-2697 v4 Intel Xeon E5-2697 v4
Famiglia e gruppo di CPU

Comprehensive background on the processors being compared, detailing their series, generation, and targeted market segment.

  • Segmento
    Desktop / Server left arrow Desktop / Server
  • Serie
    Intel Atom left arrow Intel Xeon E5
  • Generazione
    2 left arrow 6
  • Gruppo CPU
    Intel Atom C3000 left arrow Intel Xeon E5 v4
  • Modello passato
    -- left arrow Intel Xeon E5-2697 v3
Specifiche tecniche della CPU

Essential parameters including the number of cores, threads, base and turbo frequencies, and cache size. These metrics provide insight into the processor’s speed—higher values generally indicate better performance.

  • Frequenza
    2.00 GHz left arrow 2.30 GHz
  • Core della CPU
    16 left arrow 18
  • Turbo (1 Core)
    No turbo left arrow 3.60 GHz
  • Threads della CPU
    16 left arrow 36
  • Hyperthreading
    No left arrow
  • Overclock
    No left arrow No
  • Architettura di base
    normal left arrow normal
IGPU

The integrated graphics (iGPU) do not influence the CPU performance significantly; they serve as a substitute for a dedicated graphics card in the absence of one or are utilized in mobile devices.

  • Nome della GPU
    no iGPU left arrow no iGPU
  • GPU (Turbo)
    No turbo left arrow No turbo
Supporto codec hardware

This section details the built-in codecs used for encoding and decoding media content, which significantly enhance processing speed and efficiency.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h264
    No left arrow No
  • VP9
    No left arrow No
  • VP8
    No left arrow No
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • AVC
    No left arrow No
  • VC-1
    No left arrow No
  • JPEG
    No left arrow No
Specifiche di memoria e PCI

Overview of the types and quantities of RAM supported by Intel Xeon E5-2697 v4 e Intel Atom C3958. The supported memory frequencies may vary depending on the motherboard configuration.

  • Tipo di memoria
    DDR4-2400 left arrow DDR4-2400
  • Max. Memoria
    256 GB left arrow
  • ECC
    left arrow
  • Canali di memoria
    2 left arrow 4
  • Versione PCIe
    3.0 left arrow 3.0
  • Corsie PCIe
    16 left arrow 40
Crittografia
  • AES-NI
    left arrow
Consumo di energia

Analyze the TDP (Thermal Design Power) requirements of Intel Atom C3958 e Intel Xeon E5-2697 v4 to make an informed decision on the appropriate cooling system. Remember that TDP refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.

  • TDP (PL1)
    31 W left arrow 145 W
  • Temperatura massima
    100 °C left arrow --
Tecnologie ed estensioni

Information on architecture, interfaces, and additional instructions supported by Intel Atom C3958 e Intel Xeon E5-2697 v4, including virtual machine technologies and fabrication processes.

  • Set di istruzioni (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • Virtualizzazione
    VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d left arrow VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
  • Estensioni ISA
    SSE4.1, SSE4.2 left arrow SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2
  • L2-Cache
    16.00 MB left arrow --
  • L3-Cache
    -- left arrow 45.00 MB
  • Architettura
    Denverton left arrow Broadwell E
  • Processo tecnico
    14 nm left arrow 14 nm
  • Presa
    BGA 1310 left arrow LGA 2011-3
  • Data di rilascio
    Q3/2017 left arrow Q1/2016

Benchmark (test)

Test di performance CPUs

By analyzing the results from various benchmarks, you can gain a clearer understanding of the performance differences between Intel Atom C3958 e Intel Xeon E5-2697 v4.

Compare the synthetic benchmark scores and make an informed decision on the best processor for your needs!

Ultimi confronti