Sélectionner le processeur 1
Sélectionner le processeur 2
Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX Vega 56
Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX Vega 56

Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX Vega 56 contre Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX Vega 56. Spécifications, performances, tests

Note globale
star star star star star
Libéré
Q3/2017
Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX Vega 56
Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX Vega 56
Libéré
Q3/2017
Note globale
star star star star star
Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX Vega 56
Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX Vega 56

Comparison of Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX Vega 56 et Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX Vega 56 Now is the perfect time to figure out which graphics card delivers the highest performance, what sets them apart, and the reasons behind those differences.

In front of you is a detailed comparison between the Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX Vega 56 and the Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX Vega 56 to assist you in selecting the best card for your needs, we will examine their specifications, benchmark scores, and overall performance, guiding you toward an informed decision.

Comparing the Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX Vega 56 to the Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX Vega 56 analyzing performance in various popular benchmarks highlights the key differences between these models. By understanding the distinctions between these two cards, you’ll be able to choose the best option for your needs, whether you’re a gamer, content creator, or someone seeking pure processing power..

Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX Vega 56: boasts a maximum frequency of 1.266 GHz+ 10 % GHz + 6%. It is equipped with 8 GBGB of RAM. The memory type is HBM2. It was released in Q3/2017.

Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX Vega 56: It has a maximum clock speed of 1.208 GHz+ 4 % GHz. It comes with 8 GBGB of memory. The memory type is HBM2. Released in Q1 Q3/2017.

Differences

  • Place dans le classement général

    (sur la base de plusieurs critères de référence)

    1284 left arrow score
  • Vitesse d'horloge plus élevée

    Autour de 5% une meilleure vitesse d'horloge

    1.266 GHz+ 10 % left arrow 1.208 GHz+ 4 %

Positions dans tous les classements

Positions communes Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX Vega 56 GPU dans des benchmarks populaires, pour comparaison avec d'autres modèles.

  • FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS)
    1230 place
  • Battlefield 5
    1521 place
  • Shadow of the Tomb Raider
    1882 place
  • Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s)
    927 place
  • Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s)
    259 place
  • Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s)
    1410 place
  • 3DMark Benchmark
    2091 place
  • Crypto-Mining Vertcoin Hashrate (MH/s)
    612 place
  • Place dans le classement général

    (sur la base de plusieurs critères de référence)

    1327 left arrow score

Positions dans tous les classements

Positions communes Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX Vega 56 GPU dans des benchmarks populaires, pour comparaison avec d'autres modèles.

  • FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS)
    1268 place
  • Battlefield 5
    1573 place
  • Shadow of the Tomb Raider
    1934 place
  • Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s)
    944 place
  • Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s)
    266 place
  • Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s)
    1514 place
  • 3DMark Benchmark
    2120 place
  • Crypto-Mining Vertcoin Hashrate (MH/s)
    643 place

Spécifications

Données techniques
Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX Vega 56 Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX Vega 56
Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX Vega 56 Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX Vega 56
General Information

This section provides a detailed comparison of the fundamental technical specifications of the graphics cards Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX Vega 56 et Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX Vega 56. It provides essential details like the GPU architecture, the number of processing units, and other key features that significantly influence the overall performance of the cards across different applications, including gaming and professional tasks..

  • Sur la base de
    AMD RX Vega 56 left arrow AMD RX Vega 56
  • Puce GPU
    Vega 10 XL left arrow Vega 10 XL
  • Unités d'exécution
    56 left arrow 56
  • Shader
    3584 left arrow 3584
  • Unités de sortie de rendu
    64 left arrow 64
  • Unités de texture
    256 left arrow 256
Memory Configuration

This section provides a comparison of the memory configurations of Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX Vega 56 et Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX Vega 56. It includes details such as the memory size, type (e.g., GDDR6, HBM2), and bandwidth, which are key factors that determine how efficiently the card handles large textures, data sets, and high-resolution tasks.Larger memory sizes are typically beneficial for demanding applications like 4K gaming and video editing.

  • Taille de la mémoire
    8 GB left arrow 8 GB
  • Type de mémoire
    HBM2 left arrow HBM2
  • Vitesse de la mémoire
    0.8 GHz left arrow 0.8 GHz
  • Bande de mémoire
    410 GB/s left arrow 410 GB/s
  • Interface mémoire
    2048 bit left arrow 2048 bit
Fréquence d'horloge

This section focuses on comparing the clock speeds of Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX Vega 56 et Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX Vega 56. It covers both the base and boost clock speeds, which have a direct impact on GPU performance during demanding tasks. Higher clock speeds generally result in smoother frame rates in games and faster processing in compute-intensive applications..

  • Fréquence de base
    1.266 GHz+ 10 % left arrow 1.208 GHz+ 4 %
  • Fréquence maximale
    1.550 GHz+ 5 % left arrow 1.512 GHz+ 3 %
  • Avg (Game) Clock
    left arrow
  • Overclocking
    Oui left arrow Oui
Consommation d'énergie

This section examines the thermal design of Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX Vega 56 et Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX Vega 56. It provides information on power consumption (in watts) and thermal output during normal use and overclocking. Effective thermal management is crucial for ensuring stable performance during extended gaming sessions or other intensive tasks..

  • TDP
    325 W+ 55 % left arrow 280 W+ 33 %
  • TDP (up)
    -- left arrow --
  • Tjunction max
    -- left arrow --
  • PCIe-Power
    2 x 8-Pin left arrow 2 x 8-Pin
Cooling System

This section compares the cooling systems of Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX Vega 56 et Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX Vega 56. It includes details about the types of coolers (e.g., blower or open-air) and the number and size of fans, which play a crucial role in maintaining optimal temperatures during operation.Effective cooling is essential for preventing thermal throttling and extending the longevity of the GPU.

  • Type de ventilateur
    Axial left arrow Axial
  • Type de refroidisseur
    Air cooling left arrow Air cooling
  • Ventilateur 1
    2 x 92 mm left arrow 2 x 100 mm
  • Noise (Idle)
    -- left arrow --
  • Ventilateur 2
    1 x 80 mm left arrow --
  • Noise (Load)
    -- left arrow --
Interfaces

This section compares the connectivity options available on Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX Vega 56 et Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX Vega 56. This includes details on the number and types of ports, such as HDMI, DisplayPort, and others, which are crucial for connecting monitors and external devices..This information assists in identifying which card provides more flexible or up-to-date connectivity features..

  • Max. Affichages
    4 left arrow 4
  • Version HDCP
    -- left arrow --
  • Ports HDMI
    2x HDMI v2.0b left arrow 1x HDMI v2.0b
  • DP Ports
    2x DP v1.4 left arrow 3x DP v1.4
  • Ports DVI
    -- left arrow --
  • VGA Ports
    -- left arrow --
  • USB-C Ports
    -- left arrow --
Technical Specifications

This section compares the technical specifications of Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX Vega 56 et Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX Vega 56. It highlights key features such as API support for DirectX, OpenGL, and Vulkan, which are crucial for running modern games and applications efficiently.These specifications ensure compatibility and optimal performance across a wide range of software environments.

  • Résolution maximale
    7680x4320 left arrow 7680x4320
  • DirectX
    12_1 left arrow 12_1
  • Raytracing
    Non left arrow Non
  • DLSS / FSR
    Non left arrow Non
  • LED
    No LED lighting left arrow No LED lighting
Codecs vidéo pris en charge

This section compares the support for video codecs on Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX Vega 56 et Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX Vega 56. It highlights the built-in capabilities for compressing and decompressing video formats such as H.264, H.265 (HEVC), and VP9, which are important for tasks like video editing and streaming.

  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP8
    Decode left arrow Decode
  • h265 / HEVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP9
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • AV1
    Non left arrow Non
Dimensions

This section compares the physical dimensions of Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX Vega 56 et Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX Vega 56. It covers the size, weight, and slot requirements, which are key factors in ensuring compatibility with your PC case, particularly for smaller or more compact setups..

  • Longueur
    310 mm left arrow 282 mm
  • Hauteur
    133 mm left arrow 125 mm
  • Width
    54 mm left arrow 50 mm
  • Largeur (fentes)
    3 PCIe-Slots left arrow 3 PCIe-Slots
  • Weight
    -- left arrow --
Additional Information

This section provides additional information about Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX Vega 56 et Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX Vega 56. It covers aspects such as release dates, interface compatibility, and other unique features that might not be covered in other sections.This helps users make a more informed decision about the suitability of each card for their specific use case.

  • Interface GPU
    PCIe 3.0 x 16 left arrow PCIe 3.0 x 16
  • Date de sortie
    Q3/2017 left arrow Q3/2017
  • Release price
    -- left arrow --
  • Processus technologique
    14 nm left arrow 14 nm
  • Part-no
    11276-01-40G left arrow 11276-01-40G
  • spécification
    data sheet left arrow data sheet

Benchmarks

Tests de performance GPUs

By reviewing the results from several well-known benchmarks, you can more accurately assess the performance differences between Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX Vega 56 et Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX Vega 56.

Compare the synthetic benchmark results and select the best graphics card for your needs!

FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS)
Le benchmark FP32 est un calcul en virgule flottante 32 bits pour le GPU, nécessaire pour les jeux en 3D.
11.11
Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX Vega 56
10.84
Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX Vega 56
3DMark Benchmark
3DMark est conçu pour les joueurs, les overclockers et les constructeurs de systèmes qui veulent tirer le meilleur parti de leur matériel.
6996
Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX Vega 56
6906
Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX Vega 56
Battlefield 5
Battlefield 5 est un jeu réaliste, avec un benchmark intégré, très approprié comme test pour les cartes graphiques.
54 fps (avg)
Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX Vega 56
53 fps (avg)
Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX Vega 56
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
Shadow of the Tomb Raider possède un benchmark intégré, basé sur le moteur de Crystal Dynamics Foundation.
31 fps (avg)
Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX Vega 56
30 fps (avg)
Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX Vega 56
Crypto-Mining Ethereum Hashrate (MH/s)
Ethash est un algorithme de minage de la crypto-monnaie Ethereum qui exploite au mieux le GPU.
48 MH/s
Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX Vega 56
47 MH/s
Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX Vega 56
Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s)
L'algorithme Autolykos, sur lequel repose la crypto-monnaie Ergo, permet d'utiliser non seulement les GPU modernes pour le minage, mais aussi les GPU de la génération précédente.
183 MH/s
Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX Vega 56
182 MH/s
Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX Vega 56
Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s)
Le minage de la crypto-monnaie Ravencoin avec l'algorithme KawPoW est le plus rapide sur les cartes vidéo modernes.
21 MH/s
Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX Vega 56
20 MH/s
Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX Vega 56
Crypto-Mining Vertcoin Hashrate (MH/s)
La crypto-monnaie VertCoin peut être exploitée à la fois par Nvidia et AMD et est intéressante car elle fonctionne parfaitement sur les anciens GPU comme les GTX1050, R9 290 et même GTX970.
0.76 MH/s
Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX Vega 56
0.75 MH/s
Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX Vega 56

Dernières comparaisons