Intel Xeon W-3275M
Intel Xeon Gold 5318Y
Sélectionnez la carte vidéo 1
Sélectionnez la carte vidéo 2

Intel Xeon W-3275M contre Intel Xeon Gold 5318Y. Spécifications, performances, tests

Note globale
star star star star star
Libéré
Q2/2019
Intel Xeon W-3275M
Intel Xeon W-3275M
Libéré
Q2/2021
Note globale
star star star star star
Intel Xeon Gold 5318Y
Intel Xeon Gold 5318Y

Comparez Intel Xeon W-3275M VS Intel Xeon Gold 5318Y. Which processor delivers superior performance?

In this detailed comparison, we evaluate the specifications and benchmarks of both processors to determine the best choice for your needs. We analyze their core counts, maximum frequencies, and power consumption.

Intel Xeon W-3275M boasts a maximum frequency of 2.50 GHz GHz. 28 cores that enhance multitasking capabilities.With a power consumption of 205 W W, it ensures efficient performance.Sorti en Q2/2019, it incorporates the latest technology for optimal efficiency.

Intel Xeon Gold 5318Y features a maximum frequency of 2.10 GHz GHz. 24 cores designed for high-performance tasks.Its power consumption is 165 W W, providing a balance of power and efficiency.Launched in Q2/2021, it is built to handle demanding applications.

Differences

  • Place dans le classement général

    (sur la base de plusieurs critères de référence)

    35 left arrow score
  • Vitesse d'horloge plus élevée

    Autour de 16% une meilleure vitesse d'horloge

    2.50 GHz left arrow 2.10 GHz
  • Plus grand nombre de cœurs

    4 Plus de cœurs

    28 left arrow 24
  • Vitesse d'horloge turbo plus élevée

    Autour de 26% meilleure vitesse d'horloge overclockée

    4.60 GHz left arrow 3.40 GHz

Positions dans tous les classements

Positions communes Intel Xeon W-3275M CPU dans des benchmarks populaires, pour comparaison avec d'autres modèles.

  • Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
    261 place
  • Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
    34 place
  • Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
    1 place
  • Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
    23 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    2 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    70 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    72 place
  • Performance par watt

    About 0.8 moins de chaleur générée par le processeur, W.

    165 W left arrow 205 W

Positions dans tous les classements

Positions communes Intel Xeon Gold 5318Y CPU dans des benchmarks populaires, pour comparaison avec d'autres modèles.

No data

Spécifications

Données techniques
Intel Xeon W-3275M Intel Xeon W-3275M
Intel Xeon Gold 5318Y Intel Xeon Gold 5318Y
CPU famille et groupe

Comprehensive background on the processors being compared, detailing their series, generation, and targeted market segment.

  • Segment
    Desktop / Server left arrow Desktop / Server
  • Série
    Intel Xeon W left arrow Intel Xeon Gold
  • Génération
    7 left arrow 3
  • Groupe de CPU
    Intel Xeon W-2200/3200 left arrow Intel Xeon Gold 5300/6300
Caractéristiques techniques du CPU

Essential parameters including the number of cores, threads, base and turbo frequencies, and cache size. These metrics provide insight into the processor’s speed—higher values generally indicate better performance.

  • Fréquence
    2.50 GHz left arrow 2.10 GHz
  • Cœurs de CPU
    28 left arrow 24
  • Turbo (1 cœur)
    4.60 GHz left arrow 3.40 GHz
  • Fils de processeur
    56 left arrow 48
  • Hyperthreading
    Oui left arrow Oui
  • Overclocking
    Non left arrow Non
  • Architecture de base
    normal left arrow normal
IGPU

The integrated graphics (iGPU) do not influence the CPU performance significantly; they serve as a substitute for a dedicated graphics card in the absence of one or are utilized in mobile devices.

  • Nom du GPU
    pas d'iGPU left arrow pas d'iGPU
  • GPU (Turbo)
    Pas de turbo left arrow Pas de turbo
Prise en charge des codecs matériels

This section details the built-in codecs used for encoding and decoding media content, which significantly enhance processing speed and efficiency.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    Non left arrow Non
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    Non left arrow Non
  • h264
    Non left arrow Non
  • VP9
    Non left arrow Non
  • VP8
    Non left arrow Non
  • AV1
    Non left arrow Non
  • AVC
    Non left arrow Non
  • VC-1
    Non left arrow Non
  • JPEG
    Non left arrow Non
Spécifications de la mémoire et PCI

Overview of the types and quantities of RAM supported by Intel Xeon Gold 5318Y et Intel Xeon W-3275M. The supported memory frequencies may vary depending on the motherboard configuration.

  • Type de mémoire
    DDR4-2933 left arrow DDR4-2933
  • Max. Mémoire
    2048 GB left arrow 6144 GB
  • ECC
    Oui left arrow Oui
  • Canaux de mémoire
    6 left arrow 8
  • Version PCIe
    3.0 left arrow 4.0
  • Couloirs PCIe
    64 left arrow 64
Cryptage
  • AES-NI
    Oui left arrow Oui
Consommation d'énergie

Analyze the TDP (Thermal Design Power) requirements of Intel Xeon W-3275M et Intel Xeon Gold 5318Y to make an informed decision on the appropriate cooling system. Remember that TDP refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.

  • TDP (PL1)
    205 W left arrow 165 W
Technologies et extensions

Information on architecture, interfaces, and additional instructions supported by Intel Xeon W-3275M et Intel Xeon Gold 5318Y, including virtual machine technologies and fabrication processes.

  • Jeu d'instructions (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • Virtualization
    VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d left arrow VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
  • Extensions ISA
    SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512 left arrow SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512
  • L3-Cache
    38.50 MB left arrow 36.00 MB
  • Architecture
    Cascade Lake W left arrow Ice Lake
  • Processus technologique
    14 nm left arrow 10 nm
  • Socket
    LGA 3647 left arrow LGA 4189
  • Date de sortie
    Q2/2019 left arrow Q2/2021

Benchmarks

Tests de performance CPUs

By analyzing the results from various benchmarks, you can gain a clearer understanding of the performance differences between Intel Xeon W-3275M et Intel Xeon Gold 5318Y.

Compare the synthetic benchmark scores and make an informed decision on the best processor for your needs!

Dernières comparaisons