Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3
Intel Atom C3558
Seleccione la tarjeta de vídeo 1
Seleccione la tarjeta de vídeo 2

Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 contra Intel Atom C3558. Especificaciones, rendimiento, pruebas

Puntuación global
star star star star star
Liberado
Q3/2014
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3
Liberado
Q3/2017
Puntuación global
star star star star star
Intel Atom C3558
Intel Atom C3558

Compara Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 VS Intel Atom C3558. Which processor delivers superior performance?

In this detailed comparison, we evaluate the specifications and benchmarks of both processors to determine the best choice for your needs. We analyze their core counts, maximum frequencies, and power consumption.

Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 boasts a maximum frequency of 1.90 GHz GHz. 6 cores that enhance multitasking capabilities.With a power consumption of 85 W W, it ensures efficient performance.Publicado en Q3/2014, it incorporates the latest technology for optimal efficiency.

Intel Atom C3558 features a maximum frequency of 2.20 GHz GHz. 4 cores designed for high-performance tasks.Its power consumption is 16 W W, providing a balance of power and efficiency.Launched in Q3/2017, it is built to handle demanding applications.

Diferencias

  • Lugar en la clasificación general

    (basado en varios puntos de referencia)

    1074 left arrow score
  • Más número de núcleos

    2 Más núcleos

    6 left arrow 4

Posiciones en todas las clasificaciones

Posiciones comunes Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 CPU en pruebas de referencia populares, para comparar con otros modelos.

  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    940 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    494 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    630 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    292 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    782 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    316 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    766 place
Intel Atom C3558 Razones a tener en cuenta
Intel Atom C3558
Informar de un error
  • Mayor velocidad de reloj

    En 14% mejor velocidad de reloj

    2.20 GHz left arrow 1.90 GHz
  • Rendimiento por vatio

    About 0.19 menos calor generado por el procesador, W.

    16 W left arrow 85 W

Posiciones en todas las clasificaciones

Posiciones comunes Intel Atom C3558 CPU en pruebas de referencia populares, para comparar con otros modelos.

No data

Especificaciones

Datos técnicos
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3
Intel Atom C3558 Intel Atom C3558
Familia y grupo de CPUs

Comprehensive background on the processors being compared, detailing their series, generation, and targeted market segment.

  • Segmento
    Desktop / Server left arrow Desktop / Server
  • Serie
    Intel Xeon E5 left arrow Intel Atom
  • Generación
    5 left arrow 2
  • Grupo CPU
    Intel Xeon E5 v3 left arrow Intel Atom C3000
  • Successor
    Intel Xeon E5-2609 v4 left arrow --
Especificaciones técnicas de la CPU

Essential parameters including the number of cores, threads, base and turbo frequencies, and cache size. These metrics provide insight into the processor’s speed—higher values generally indicate better performance.

  • Frecuencia
    1.90 GHz left arrow 2.20 GHz
  • Núcleos de CPU
    6 left arrow 4
  • Turbo (1 núcleo)
    sin turbo left arrow sin turbo
  • Hilos de la CPU
    6 left arrow 4
  • Hyperthreading
    No left arrow No
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow No
  • Arquitectura del núcleo
    normal left arrow normal
IGPU

The integrated graphics (iGPU) do not influence the CPU performance significantly; they serve as a substitute for a dedicated graphics card in the absence of one or are utilized in mobile devices.

  • Nombre de la GPU
    sin iGPU left arrow sin iGPU
  • GPU (Turbo)
    sin turbo left arrow sin turbo
Compatibilidad con códecs de hardware

This section details the built-in codecs used for encoding and decoding media content, which significantly enhance processing speed and efficiency.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h264
    No left arrow No
  • VP9
    No left arrow No
  • VP8
    No left arrow No
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • AVC
    No left arrow No
  • VC-1
    No left arrow No
  • JPEG
    No left arrow No
Especificaciones de memoria y PCI

Overview of the types and quantities of RAM supported by Intel Atom C3558 y Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3. The supported memory frequencies may vary depending on the motherboard configuration.

  • Tipo de memoria
    DDR4-2133 left arrow DDR4-2133
  • Max. Memoria
    left arrow 256 GB
  • ECC
    left arrow
  • Canales de memoria
    4 left arrow 2
  • Versión PCIe
    3.0 left arrow 3.0
  • Carriles PCIe
    40 left arrow 12
Cifrado
  • AES-NI
    left arrow
Consumo de energía

Analyze the TDP (Thermal Design Power) requirements of Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 y Intel Atom C3558 to make an informed decision on the appropriate cooling system. Remember that TDP refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.

  • TDP (PL1)
    85 W left arrow 16 W
  • Temperatura máxima
    -- left arrow 100 °C
Tecnologías y extensiones

Information on architecture, interfaces, and additional instructions supported by Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 y Intel Atom C3558, including virtual machine technologies and fabrication processes.

  • Juego de instrucciones (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • Virtualización
    VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d left arrow VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
  • Extensiones ISA
    SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2 left arrow SSE4.1, SSE4.2
  • L2-Cache
    -- left arrow 8.00 MB
  • L3-Cache
    15.00 MB left arrow --
  • Arquitectura
    Haswell E left arrow Denverton
  • Proceso técnico
    22 nm left arrow 14 nm
  • Enchufe
    LGA 2011-3 left arrow BGA 1310
  • Fecha de publicación
    Q3/2014 left arrow Q3/2017

Puntos de referencia

Pruebas de rendimiento CPUs

By analyzing the results from various benchmarks, you can gain a clearer understanding of the performance differences between Intel Xeon E5-2609 v3 y Intel Atom C3558.

Compare the synthetic benchmark scores and make an informed decision on the best processor for your needs!

Últimas comparaciones