Compara AMD FX-8140 VS Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2. Which processor delivers superior performance?
In this detailed comparison, we evaluate the specifications and benchmarks of both processors to determine the best choice for your needs. We analyze their core counts, maximum frequencies, and power consumption.
AMD FX-8140 boasts a maximum frequency of 3.20 GHz GHz. 8 cores that enhance multitasking capabilities.With a power consumption of 95 W W, it ensures efficient performance.Publicado en Q4/2012, it incorporates the latest technology for optimal efficiency.
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2 features a maximum frequency of 3.00 GHz GHz. 10 cores designed for high-performance tasks.Its power consumption is 130 W W, providing a balance of power and efficiency.Launched in Q3/2013, it is built to handle demanding applications.
Razones a tener en cuenta Lugar en la clasificación general
(basado en varios puntos de referencia)
score
Mayor velocidad de reloj
En 6% mejor velocidad de reloj
3.00 GHz
Mayor velocidad de reloj turbo
En 12% mejor velocidad de reloj en overclocking
3.60 GHz
Rendimiento por vatio
menos calor generado por el procesador, W.
130 W
Posiciones comunes AMD FX-8140 CPU en pruebas de referencia populares, para comparar con otros modelos.
Razones a tener en cuenta Lugar en la clasificación general
(basado en varios puntos de referencia)
score
Más número de núcleos
About 1.25 Más núcleos
8
Posiciones comunes Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2 CPU en pruebas de referencia populares, para comparar con otros modelos.
AMD FX-8140
Comprehensive background on the processors being compared, detailing their series, generation, and targeted market segment.
Desktop / Server
Intel Xeon E5
4
Intel Xeon E5 v2
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v3
Essential parameters including the number of cores, threads, base and turbo frequencies, and cache size. These metrics provide insight into the processor’s speed—higher values generally indicate better performance.
3.00 GHz
10
3.60 GHz
20
Sí
No
normal
The integrated graphics (iGPU) do not influence the CPU performance significantly; they serve as a substitute for a dedicated graphics card in the absence of one or are utilized in mobile devices.
sin iGPU
sin turbo
This section details the built-in codecs used for encoding and decoding media content, which significantly enhance processing speed and efficiency.
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
No
Overview of the types and quantities of RAM supported by Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2 y AMD FX-8140. The supported memory frequencies may vary depending on the motherboard configuration.
DDR3-1866
Sí
4
3.0
40
Sí
Analyze the TDP (Thermal Design Power) requirements of AMD FX-8140 y Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2 to make an informed decision on the appropriate cooling system. Remember that TDP refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.
130 W
Information on architecture, interfaces, and additional instructions supported by AMD FX-8140 y Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2, including virtual machine technologies and fabrication processes.
x86-64 (64 bit)
VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX
25.00 MB
Ivy Bridge EP
22 nm
LGA 2011
Q3/2013
By analyzing the results from various benchmarks, you can gain a clearer understanding of the performance differences between AMD FX-8140 y Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2.
Compare the synthetic benchmark scores and make an informed decision on the best processor for your needs!
English
Russian
German
Portuguese
Italian
French
Japan
Polish
Chinese
Korean
