Select processor 1
Select processor 2
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1050 OC
ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650

KFA2 GeForce GTX 1050 OC vs ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650. Specifications, performance, tests

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q3/2016
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1050 OC
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1050 OC
Released
Q2/2019
Overall score
star star star star star
ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650
ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650

Comparison of KFA2 GeForce GTX 1050 OC and ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 Now is the perfect time to figure out which graphics card delivers the highest performance, what sets them apart, and the reasons behind those differences.

In front of you is a detailed comparison between the KFA2 GeForce GTX 1050 OC and the ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 to assist you in selecting the best card for your needs, we will examine their specifications, benchmark scores, and overall performance, guiding you toward an informed decision.

Comparing the KFA2 GeForce GTX 1050 OC to the ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 analyzing performance in various popular benchmarks highlights the key differences between these models. By understanding the distinctions between these two cards, you’ll be able to choose the best option for your needs, whether you’re a gamer, content creator, or someone seeking pure processing power..

KFA2 GeForce GTX 1050 OC: boasts a maximum frequency of 1.366 GHz+ 1 % GHz + 6%. It is equipped with 2 GBGB of RAM. The memory type is GDDR5. It was released in Q3/2016.

ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650: It has a maximum clock speed of 1.485 GHz GHz. It comes with 4 GBGB of memory. The memory type is GDDR5. Released in Q1 Q2/2019.

Differences

  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    3000 left arrow score

Positions in all rankings

Common positions KFA2 GeForce GTX 1050 OC GPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS)
    3030 place
  • Battlefield 5
    2980 place
  • Shadow of the Tomb Raider
    2951 place
  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    2908 left arrow score
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 8% better clock speed

    1.485 GHz left arrow 1.366 GHz+ 1 %
  • More memory

    50% more memory

    4 GB left arrow 2 GB

Positions in all rankings

Common positions ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 GPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS)
    2824 place
  • Battlefield 5
    2807 place
  • Shadow of the Tomb Raider
    2742 place
  • Crypto-Mining Ergo Hashrate (MH/s)
    2839 place
  • Crypto-Mining Ravencoin Hashrate (MH/s)
    2691 place

Specifications

Technical data
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1050 OC KFA2 GeForce GTX 1050 OC
ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650 ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650
General Information

This section provides a detailed comparison of the fundamental technical specifications of the graphics cards KFA2 GeForce GTX 1050 OC and ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650. It provides essential details like the GPU architecture, the number of processing units, and other key features that significantly influence the overall performance of the cards across different applications, including gaming and professional tasks..

  • Based on
    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 2GB left arrow NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 (GDDR5)
  • GPU Chip
    GP107-300-A1 left arrow TU117-300-A1
  • Execution units
    5 left arrow 14
  • Shader
    640 left arrow 896
  • Render Output Units
    32 left arrow 32
  • Texture Units
    40 left arrow 56
Memory Configuration

This section provides a comparison of the memory configurations of KFA2 GeForce GTX 1050 OC and ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650. It includes details such as the memory size, type (e.g., GDDR6, HBM2), and bandwidth, which are key factors that determine how efficiently the card handles large textures, data sets, and high-resolution tasks.Larger memory sizes are typically beneficial for demanding applications like 4K gaming and video editing.

  • Memory Size
    2 GB left arrow 4 GB
  • Memory Type
    GDDR5 left arrow GDDR5
  • Memory Speed
    1.752 GHz left arrow 2 GHz
  • Memory Bandwith
    112 GB/s left arrow 128 GB/s
  • Memory Interface
    128 bit left arrow 128 bit
Clock Speeds

This section focuses on comparing the clock speeds of KFA2 GeForce GTX 1050 OC and ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650. It covers both the base and boost clock speeds, which have a direct impact on GPU performance during demanding tasks. Higher clock speeds generally result in smoother frame rates in games and faster processing in compute-intensive applications..

  • Base Clock
    1.366 GHz+ 1 % left arrow 1.485 GHz
  • Boost Clock
    1.468 GHz+ 1 % left arrow 1.695 GHz+ 2 %
  • Avg (Game) Clock
    left arrow 1.665 GHz
  • Overclocking
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

This section examines the thermal design of KFA2 GeForce GTX 1050 OC and ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650. It provides information on power consumption (in watts) and thermal output during normal use and overclocking. Effective thermal management is crucial for ensuring stable performance during extended gaming sessions or other intensive tasks..

  • TDP
    75 W left arrow 75 W
  • TDP (up)
    -- left arrow --
  • Tjunction max
    -- left arrow --
  • PCIe-Power
    left arrow 1 x 6-Pin
Cooling System

This section compares the cooling systems of KFA2 GeForce GTX 1050 OC and ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650. It includes details about the types of coolers (e.g., blower or open-air) and the number and size of fans, which play a crucial role in maintaining optimal temperatures during operation.Effective cooling is essential for preventing thermal throttling and extending the longevity of the GPU.

  • Fan-Type
    Axial left arrow Axial
  • Cooler-Type
    Air cooling left arrow Air cooling
  • Fan 1
    1 x 90 mm left arrow 2 x 80 mm
  • Noise (Idle)
    0 dB / Silent left arrow --
  • Fan 2
    -- left arrow --
  • Noise (Load)
    -- left arrow --
Interfaces

This section compares the connectivity options available on KFA2 GeForce GTX 1050 OC and ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650. This includes details on the number and types of ports, such as HDMI, DisplayPort, and others, which are crucial for connecting monitors and external devices..This information assists in identifying which card provides more flexible or up-to-date connectivity features..

  • Max. Displays
    3 left arrow 3
  • HDCP-Version
    2.2 left arrow 2.2
  • HDMI Ports
    1x HDMI v2.0b left arrow 1x HDMI v2.0b
  • DP Ports
    1x DP v1.4 left arrow 1x DP v1.4
  • DVI Ports
    1 left arrow 1
  • VGA Ports
    -- left arrow --
  • USB-C Ports
    -- left arrow --
Technical Specifications

This section compares the technical specifications of KFA2 GeForce GTX 1050 OC and ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650. It highlights key features such as API support for DirectX, OpenGL, and Vulkan, which are crucial for running modern games and applications efficiently.These specifications ensure compatibility and optimal performance across a wide range of software environments.

  • Max. resolution
    7680x4320 left arrow 3840x2160
  • DirectX
    12_1 left arrow 12_1
  • Raytracing
    No left arrow No
  • DLSS / FSR
    No left arrow No
  • LED
    No LED lighting left arrow No LED lighting
Supported Video Codecs

This section compares the support for video codecs on KFA2 GeForce GTX 1050 OC and ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650. It highlights the built-in capabilities for compressing and decompressing video formats such as H.264, H.265 (HEVC), and VP9, which are important for tasks like video editing and streaming.

  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP8
    No left arrow Decode
  • h265 / HEVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP9
    Decode left arrow Decode
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
Dimensions

This section compares the physical dimensions of KFA2 GeForce GTX 1050 OC and ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650. It covers the size, weight, and slot requirements, which are key factors in ensuring compatibility with your PC case, particularly for smaller or more compact setups..

  • Length
    196 mm left arrow 204 mm
  • Height
    126 mm left arrow 115 mm
  • Width
    39 mm left arrow 37 mm
  • Width (Slots)
    2 PCIe-Slots left arrow 2 PCIe-Slots
  • Weight
    -- left arrow --
Additional Information

This section provides additional information about KFA2 GeForce GTX 1050 OC and ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650. It covers aspects such as release dates, interface compatibility, and other unique features that might not be covered in other sections.This helps users make a more informed decision about the suitability of each card for their specific use case.

  • GPU Interface
    PCIe 3.0 x 16 left arrow PCIe 3.0 x 16
  • Release date
    Q3/2016 left arrow Q2/2019
  • Release price
    -- left arrow --
  • Structure size
    14 nm left arrow 12 nm
  • Part-no
    50NPH8DSN8OK left arrow DUAL-GTX1650-4G
  • Documents
    data sheet left arrow data sheet

Benchmarks

Performance tests GPUs

By reviewing the results from several well-known benchmarks, you can more accurately assess the performance differences between KFA2 GeForce GTX 1050 OC and ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650.

Compare the synthetic benchmark results and select the best graphics card for your needs!

FP32 Performance (Single-precision TFLOPS)
Benchmark FP32 is a 32-bit floating point calculation for the GPU which is required for 3D gaming
1.88
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1050 OC
3.04
ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650
Battlefield 5
Battlefield 5 is a realistic game, with a built-in benchmark, very suitable as a test for graphics cards
14 fps (avg)
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1050 OC
20 fps (avg)
ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650
Shadow of the Tomb Raider
Shadow of the Tomb Raider has a built-in benchmark, based on the Crystal Dynamics Foundation engine
8 fps (avg)
KFA2 GeForce GTX 1050 OC
12 fps (avg)
ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1650

Latest comparisons