Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2
AMD FX-8310
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 vs AMD FX-8310. Specifications, performance, tests

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q3/2013
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2
Released
Q3/2014
Overall score
star star star star star
AMD FX-8310
AMD FX-8310

Compare Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 VS AMD FX-8310. Which processor delivers superior performance?

In this detailed comparison, we evaluate the specifications and benchmarks of both processors to determine the best choice for your needs. We analyze their core counts, maximum frequencies, and power consumption.

Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 boasts a maximum frequency of 3.70 GHz GHz. 4 cores that enhance multitasking capabilities.With a power consumption of 130 W W, it ensures efficient performance.Released in Q3/2013, it incorporates the latest technology for optimal efficiency.

AMD FX-8310 features a maximum frequency of 3.40 GHz GHz. 8 cores designed for high-performance tasks.Its power consumption is 95 W W, providing a balance of power and efficiency.Launched in Q3/2014, it is built to handle demanding applications.

Differences

  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    823 left arrow score
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 8% better clock speed

    3.70 GHz left arrow 3.40 GHz

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
    471 place
  • Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
    353 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    402 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    405 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    812 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    727 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    280 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    263 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    335 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    237 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    573 place
AMD FX-8310 Reasons to consider
AMD FX-8310
Report a bug
  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    933 left arrow score
  • More number of cores

    About 2 times more cores

    8 left arrow 4
  • Higher turbo clock speed

    Around 9 % better overclocked clock speed

    4.30 GHz left arrow 3.90 GHz
  • Performance per watt

    About 0.73 times less performance per watt

    95 W left arrow 130 W

Positions in all rankings

Common positions AMD FX-8310 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    807 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    456 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    579 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    351 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    464 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    300 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    593 place

Specifications

Technical data
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2
AMD FX-8310 AMD FX-8310
CPU family and group

Comprehensive background on the processors being compared, detailing their series, generation, and targeted market segment.

  • Segment
    Desktop / Server left arrow Desktop / Server
  • Family
    Intel Xeon E5 left arrow AMD FX
  • Generation
    4 left arrow 2
  • CPU group
    Intel Xeon E5 v2 left arrow AMD FX-8000
  • Successor
    Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 left arrow --
CPU Technical specs

Essential parameters including the number of cores, threads, base and turbo frequencies, and cache size. These metrics provide insight into the processor’s speed—higher values generally indicate better performance.

  • Frequency
    3.70 GHz left arrow 3.40 GHz
  • CPU Cores
    4 left arrow 8
  • Turbo (1 Core)
    3.90 GHz left arrow 4.30 GHz
  • CPU Threads
    8 left arrow 8
  • Hyperthreading
    Yes left arrow No
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow Yes
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow normal
IGPU

The integrated graphics (iGPU) do not influence the CPU performance significantly; they serve as a substitute for a dedicated graphics card in the absence of one or are utilized in mobile devices.

  • GPU name
    no iGPU left arrow no iGPU
  • GPU (Turbo)
    No turbo left arrow No turbo
Hardware codec support

This section details the built-in codecs used for encoding and decoding media content, which significantly enhance processing speed and efficiency.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h264
    No left arrow No
  • VP9
    No left arrow No
  • VP8
    No left arrow No
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • AVC
    No left arrow No
  • VC-1
    No left arrow No
  • JPEG
    No left arrow No
Memory specs & PCI

Overview of the types and quantities of RAM supported by AMD FX-8310 and Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2. The supported memory frequencies may vary depending on the motherboard configuration.

  • Memory type
    DDR3-1866 left arrow DDR3-1866
  • ECC
    Yes left arrow Yes
  • Memory channels
    4 left arrow 2
  • PCIe version
    3.0 left arrow
  • PCIe lanes
    40 left arrow
Encryption
  • AES-NI
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Analyze the TDP (Thermal Design Power) requirements of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 and AMD FX-8310 to make an informed decision on the appropriate cooling system. Remember that TDP refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.

  • TDP (PL1)
    130 W left arrow 95 W
Technologies and extensions

Information on architecture, interfaces, and additional instructions supported by Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 and AMD FX-8310, including virtual machine technologies and fabrication processes.

  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • Virtualization
    VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d left arrow AMD-V
  • ISA extensions
    SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX left arrow SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, FMA3, FMA4
  • L3-Cache
    10.00 MB left arrow 8.00 MB
  • Architecture
    Ivy Bridge EP left arrow Vishera (Bulldozer)
  • Technology
    22 nm left arrow 32 nm
  • Socket
    LGA 2011 left arrow AM3+
  • Release date
    Q3/2013 left arrow Q3/2014

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

By analyzing the results from various benchmarks, you can gain a clearer understanding of the performance differences between Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2 and AMD FX-8310.

Compare the synthetic benchmark scores and make an informed decision on the best processor for your needs!

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
The Cinebench R15 SC stresses the computing modules of a desktop or laptop computer to their limits and accurately determines the key performance parameters of the hardware
153
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2
98
AMD FX-8310
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
The Cinebench R15 MC stresses the computing modules of a desktop or laptop computer to their limits and accurately determines the key performance parameters of the hardware
730
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2
665
AMD FX-8310
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 SC for one CPU core, includes stress tests simulating real 3D scenarios for Windows, Mac, Linux, Ansroid, iOS
3640
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2
2195
AMD FX-8310
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 MC using a multi-core and hyperthreading, includes stress tests simulating real 3D scenarios for Windows, Mac, Linux, Ansroid, iOS
13946
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2
11164
AMD FX-8310
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
The PC CPU and GPU test involves rendering a specific 3D scene in single-core mode, based on CINEMA 4D
1.76
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2
1.14
AMD FX-8310
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
The PC CPU and GPU test involves rendering a specific 3D scene in multi-core mode and hyperthreading, based on CINEMA 4D
8.06
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2
6.94
AMD FX-8310
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
PassMark is a test suite that performs complex mathematical calculations to determine CPU performance on file compression, encryption and physics-related tasks
9500
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2
9065
AMD FX-8310

Latest comparisons