Intel Core i5-10300H
Intel Core i5-1030G4
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

Intel Core i5-10300H vs Intel Core i5-1030G4. Specifications, performance, tests

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q2/2020
Intel Core i5-10300H
Intel Core i5-10300H
Released
Q3/2019
Overall score
star star star star star
Intel Core i5-1030G4
Intel Core i5-1030G4

Compare Intel Core i5-10300H VS Intel Core i5-1030G4. Which processor delivers superior performance?

In this detailed comparison, we evaluate the specifications and benchmarks of both processors to determine the best choice for your needs. We analyze their core counts, maximum frequencies, and power consumption.

Intel Core i5-10300H boasts a maximum frequency of 2.50 GHz GHz. 4 cores that enhance multitasking capabilities.With a power consumption of 45 W W, it ensures efficient performance.Released in Q2/2020, it incorporates the latest technology for optimal efficiency.

Intel Core i5-1030G4 features a maximum frequency of 0.70 GHz GHz. 4 cores designed for high-performance tasks.Its power consumption is 9 W W, providing a balance of power and efficiency.Launched in Q3/2019, it is built to handle demanding applications.

Differences

  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    649 left arrow score
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 72% better clock speed

    2.50 GHz left arrow 0.70 GHz
  • Higher turbo clock speed

    Around 22% better overclocked clock speed

    4.50 GHz left arrow 3.50 GHz

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Intel Core i5-10300H CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
    218 place
  • Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
    274 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    170 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    351 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    361 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    573 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    813 place
  • Blender 2.81 (bmw27)
    71 place
  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    744 left arrow score
  • Performance per watt

    About 0.2 times less performance per watt

    9 W left arrow 45 W

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Intel Core i5-1030G4 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
    301 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    369 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    508 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    477 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    822 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    412 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    60 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    265 place

Specifications

Technical data
Intel Core i5-10300H Intel Core i5-10300H
Intel Core i5-1030G4 Intel Core i5-1030G4
CPU family and group

Comprehensive background on the processors being compared, detailing their series, generation, and targeted market segment.

  • Segment
    Mobile left arrow Mobile
  • Family
    Intel Core i5 left arrow Intel Core i5
  • Generation
    10 left arrow 10
  • CPU group
    Intel Core i 10000H left arrow Intel Core i 1000G/10000U
CPU Technical specs

Essential parameters including the number of cores, threads, base and turbo frequencies, and cache size. These metrics provide insight into the processor’s speed—higher values generally indicate better performance.

  • Frequency
    2.50 GHz left arrow 0.70 GHz
  • CPU Cores
    4 left arrow 4
  • Turbo (1 Core)
    4.50 GHz left arrow 3.50 GHz
  • CPU Threads
    8 left arrow 8
  • Turbo (4 Cores)
    4.20 GHz left arrow 3.00 GHz
  • Hyperthreading
    Yes left arrow Yes
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow No
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow normal
IGPU

The integrated graphics (iGPU) do not influence the CPU performance significantly; they serve as a substitute for a dedicated graphics card in the absence of one or are utilized in mobile devices.

  • GPU name
    Intel UHD Graphics 630 left arrow Intel Iris Plus Graphics (Ice Lake G4)
  • GPU frequency
    0.35 GHz left arrow 0.30 GHz
  • GPU (Turbo)
    1.10 GHz left arrow 1.05 GHz
  • Execution units
    24 left arrow 48
  • Shader
    192 left arrow 384
  • Max. GPU Memory
    64 GB left arrow --
  • Max. displays
    3 left arrow 3
  • Generation
    9.5 left arrow 11
  • DirectX Version
    12 left arrow 12
  • Technology
    14 nm left arrow 14 nm
  • Release date
    Q4/2017 left arrow Q3/2019
Hardware codec support

This section details the built-in codecs used for encoding and decoding media content, which significantly enhance processing speed and efficiency.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP9
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP8
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • AVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VC-1
    Decode left arrow Decode
  • JPEG
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
Memory specs & PCI

Overview of the types and quantities of RAM supported by Intel Core i5-1030G4 and Intel Core i5-10300H. The supported memory frequencies may vary depending on the motherboard configuration.

  • Memory type
    DDR4-2933 left arrow DDR4-3200LPDDR4-3733
  • Max. Memory
    128 GB left arrow 32 GB
  • ECC
    No left arrow No
  • Memory channels
    2 left arrow 2
  • PCIe version
    3.0 left arrow 3.0
  • PCIe lanes
    16 left arrow 16
Encryption
  • AES-NI
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Analyze the TDP (Thermal Design Power) requirements of Intel Core i5-10300H and Intel Core i5-1030G4 to make an informed decision on the appropriate cooling system. Remember that TDP refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.

  • TDP (PL1)
    45 W left arrow 9 W
  • TDP up
    -- left arrow 12 W
  • TDP down
    35 W left arrow --
  • Tjunction max.
    100 °C left arrow 100 °C
Technologies and extensions

Information on architecture, interfaces, and additional instructions supported by Intel Core i5-10300H and Intel Core i5-1030G4, including virtual machine technologies and fabrication processes.

  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • Virtualization
    VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d left arrow VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
  • ISA extensions
    SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2 left arrow SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2
  • L3-Cache
    8.00 MB left arrow 6.00 MB
  • Architecture
    Comet Lake H left arrow Ice Lake U
  • Technology
    14 nm left arrow 10 nm
  • Socket
    BGA 1440 left arrow BGA 1526
  • Release date
    Q2/2020 left arrow Q3/2019

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

By analyzing the results from various benchmarks, you can gain a clearer understanding of the performance differences between Intel Core i5-10300H and Intel Core i5-1030G4.

Compare the synthetic benchmark scores and make an informed decision on the best processor for your needs!

Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
The Cinebench R15 SC stresses the computing modules of a desktop or laptop computer to their limits and accurately determines the key performance parameters of the hardware
189
Intel Core i5-10300H
159
Intel Core i5-1030G4
Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
The Cinebench R15 MC stresses the computing modules of a desktop or laptop computer to their limits and accurately determines the key performance parameters of the hardware
841
Intel Core i5-10300H
591
Intel Core i5-1030G4
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 SC is a popular cross-platform performance test for desktop or mobile processors that uses system memory intensively
1201
Intel Core i5-10300H
1068
Intel Core i5-1030G4
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 MC is a popular cross-platform performance test for desktop or mobile processors that uses system memory intensively
4510
Intel Core i5-10300H
2762
Intel Core i5-1030G4
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The performance of the iGPU - the internal GPU in games
422
Intel Core i5-10300H
538
Intel Core i5-1030G4

Latest comparisons