Intel Atom E3815
Intel Celeron N2920
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

Intel Atom E3815 vs Intel Celeron N2920. Specifications, performance, tests

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q4/2013
Intel Atom E3815
Intel Atom E3815
Released
Q4/2013
Overall score
star star star star star
Intel Celeron N2920
Intel Celeron N2920

Compare Intel Atom E3815 VS Intel Celeron N2920. Which processor delivers superior performance?

In this detailed comparison, we evaluate the specifications and benchmarks of both processors to determine the best choice for your needs. We analyze their core counts, maximum frequencies, and power consumption.

Intel Atom E3815 boasts a maximum frequency of 1.46 GHz GHz. 1 cores that enhance multitasking capabilities.With a power consumption of 5 W W, it ensures efficient performance.Released in Q4/2013, it incorporates the latest technology for optimal efficiency.

Intel Celeron N2920 features a maximum frequency of 1.86 GHz GHz. 4 cores designed for high-performance tasks.Its power consumption is 7.5 W W, providing a balance of power and efficiency.Launched in Q4/2013, it is built to handle demanding applications.

Differences

Intel Atom E3815 Reasons to consider
Intel Atom E3815
Report a bug
  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    1650 left arrow score
  • Performance per watt

    times less performance per watt

    5 W left arrow 7.5 W

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Intel Atom E3815 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    1459 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    1744 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    901 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    927 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    722 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    810 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)
    378 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    1408 place
  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    1437 left arrow score
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 22% better clock speed

    1.86 GHz left arrow 1.46 GHz
  • More number of cores

    About 4 times more cores

    4 left arrow 1

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Intel Celeron N2920 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R20 (Single-Core)
    588 place
  • Cinebench R20 (Multi-Core)
    523 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    1061 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    1016 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    1655 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    863 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    814 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    644 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    692 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)
    355 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    1275 place

Specifications

Technical data
Intel Atom E3815 Intel Atom E3815
Intel Celeron N2920 Intel Celeron N2920
CPU family and group

Comprehensive background on the processors being compared, detailing their series, generation, and targeted market segment.

  • Segment
    Mobile left arrow Mobile
  • Family
    Intel Atom left arrow Intel Celeron
  • Generation
    4 left arrow 6
  • CPU group
    Intel Atom E3800 left arrow Intel Celeron J1000/N2000
CPU Technical specs

Essential parameters including the number of cores, threads, base and turbo frequencies, and cache size. These metrics provide insight into the processor’s speed—higher values generally indicate better performance.

  • Frequency
    1.46 GHz left arrow 1.86 GHz
  • CPU Cores
    1 left arrow 4
  • Turbo (1 Core)
    No turbo left arrow 2.00 GHz
  • CPU Threads
    1 left arrow 4
  • Hyperthreading
    No left arrow No
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow No
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow normal
IGPU

The integrated graphics (iGPU) do not influence the CPU performance significantly; they serve as a substitute for a dedicated graphics card in the absence of one or are utilized in mobile devices.

  • GPU name
    Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1) left arrow Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail GT1)
  • GPU frequency
    0.40 GHz left arrow 0.31 GHz
  • GPU (Turbo)
    0.40 GHz left arrow 0.84 GHz
  • Execution units
    4 left arrow 4
  • Shader
    32 left arrow 32
  • Max. GPU Memory
    8 GB left arrow 8 GB
  • Max. displays
    2 left arrow 2
  • Generation
    7 left arrow 7
  • DirectX Version
    11.2 left arrow 11.2
  • Technology
    22 nm left arrow 22 nm
  • Release date
    Q3/2013 left arrow Q3/2013
Hardware codec support

This section details the built-in codecs used for encoding and decoding media content, which significantly enhance processing speed and efficiency.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VP9
    No left arrow No
  • VP8
    No left arrow No
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • AVC
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode / Encode
  • VC-1
    Decode left arrow Decode
  • JPEG
    Decode left arrow Decode
Memory specs & PCI

Overview of the types and quantities of RAM supported by Intel Celeron N2920 and Intel Atom E3815. The supported memory frequencies may vary depending on the motherboard configuration.

  • Memory type
    DDR3L-1066 SO-DIMM left arrow DDR3L-1066 SO-DIMM
  • ECC
    No left arrow No
  • Memory channels
    1 left arrow 2
  • PCIe version
    left arrow 2.0
  • PCIe lanes
    left arrow 4
Encryption
  • AES-NI
    Yes left arrow No
Thermal Management

Analyze the TDP (Thermal Design Power) requirements of Intel Atom E3815 and Intel Celeron N2920 to make an informed decision on the appropriate cooling system. Remember that TDP refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.

  • TDP (PL1)
    5 W left arrow 7.5 W
Technologies and extensions

Information on architecture, interfaces, and additional instructions supported by Intel Atom E3815 and Intel Celeron N2920, including virtual machine technologies and fabrication processes.

  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • Virtualization
    VT-x, VT-x EPT left arrow VT-x, VT-x EPT
  • ISA extensions
    SSE4.1, SSE4.2 left arrow SSE4.1, SSE4.2
  • L3-Cache
    1.00 MB left arrow 2.00 MB
  • Architecture
    Bay Trail left arrow Bay Trail
  • Technology
    22 nm left arrow 22 nm
  • Socket
    BGA 1170 left arrow BGA 1170
  • Release date
    Q4/2013 left arrow Q4/2013

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

By analyzing the results from various benchmarks, you can gain a clearer understanding of the performance differences between Intel Atom E3815 and Intel Celeron N2920.

Compare the synthetic benchmark scores and make an informed decision on the best processor for your needs!

iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The performance of the iGPU - the internal GPU in games
26
Intel Atom E3815
54
Intel Celeron N2920
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 3 SC for one CPU core, includes stress tests simulating real 3D scenarios for Windows, Mac, Linux, Ansroid, iOS
591
Intel Atom E3815
849
Intel Celeron N2920
Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 3 MC using a multi-core and hyperthreading, includes stress tests simulating real 3D scenarios for Windows, Mac, Linux, Ansroid, iOS
591
Intel Atom E3815
2715
Intel Celeron N2920
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
The PC CPU and GPU test involves rendering a specific 3D scene in single-core mode, based on CINEMA 4D
0.27
Intel Atom E3815
0.38
Intel Celeron N2920
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
The PC CPU and GPU test involves rendering a specific 3D scene in multi-core mode and hyperthreading, based on CINEMA 4D
0.27
Intel Atom E3815
1.4
Intel Celeron N2920
Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (iGPU, OpenGL)
The iGPU test involves rendering a specific 3D scene, based on CINEMA 4D
4.7
Intel Atom E3815
10.2
Intel Celeron N2920
Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
PassMark is a test suite that performs complex mathematical calculations to determine CPU performance on file compression, encryption and physics-related tasks
384
Intel Atom E3815
1638
Intel Celeron N2920

Latest comparisons