HiSilicon Kirin 655
Qualcomm Snapdragon 650
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

HiSilicon Kirin 655 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 650. Specifications, performance, tests

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q2/2016
HiSilicon Kirin 655
HiSilicon Kirin 655
Released
Q1/2016
Overall score
star star star star star
Qualcomm Snapdragon 650
Qualcomm Snapdragon 650

Compare HiSilicon Kirin 655 VS Qualcomm Snapdragon 650. Which processor delivers superior performance?

In this detailed comparison, we evaluate the specifications and benchmarks of both processors to determine the best choice for your needs. We analyze their core counts, maximum frequencies, and power consumption.

HiSilicon Kirin 655 boasts a maximum frequency of 1.70 GHz GHz. 8 cores that enhance multitasking capabilities.Released in Q2/2016, it incorporates the latest technology for optimal efficiency.

Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 features a maximum frequency of 1.40 GHz GHz. 6 cores designed for high-performance tasks.Launched in Q1/2016, it is built to handle demanding applications.

Differences

  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    1825 left arrow score
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 18% better clock speed

    1.70 GHz left arrow 1.40 GHz
  • More number of cores

    2 times more cores

    8 left arrow 6
  • Higher turbo clock speed

    Around 15% better overclocked clock speed

    2.12 GHz left arrow 1.80 GHz

Positions in all rankings

Common positions HiSilicon Kirin 655 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    1442 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    1384 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    1718 place
  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    1811 left arrow score

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    1396 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    1378 place
  • iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
    1449 place

Specifications

Technical data
HiSilicon Kirin 655 HiSilicon Kirin 655
Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 Qualcomm Snapdragon 650
CPU family and group

Comprehensive background on the processors being compared, detailing their series, generation, and targeted market segment.

  • Segment
    Mobile left arrow Mobile
  • Family
    HiSilicon Kirin left arrow Qualcomm Snapdragon
  • Generation
    4 left arrow 4
  • CPU group
    HiSilicon Kirin 650 left arrow Qualcomm Snapdragon 650
CPU Technical specs

Essential parameters including the number of cores, threads, base and turbo frequencies, and cache size. These metrics provide insight into the processor’s speed—higher values generally indicate better performance.

  • Frequency
    1.70 GHz left arrow 1.40 GHz
  • CPU Cores
    8 left arrow 6
  • Turbo (1 Core)
    2.12 GHz left arrow 1.80 GHz
  • CPU Threads
    8 left arrow 6
  • Hyperthreading
    No left arrow No
  • Overclocking
    No left arrow No
  • Core architecture
    hybrid (big.LITTLE) left arrow hybrid (big.LITTLE)
  • A core
    4x Cortex-A53 left arrow 2x Cortex-A72
  • B core
    4x Cortex-A53 left arrow 4x Cortex-A53
IGPU

The integrated graphics (iGPU) do not influence the CPU performance significantly; they serve as a substitute for a dedicated graphics card in the absence of one or are utilized in mobile devices.

  • GPU name
    ARM Mali-T830 MP2 left arrow Qualcomm Adreno 510
  • GPU frequency
    0.90 GHz left arrow 0.60 GHz
  • GPU (Turbo)
    0.90 GHz left arrow 0.60 GHz
  • Execution units
    2 left arrow 0
  • Shader
    32 left arrow 128
  • Max. displays
    2 left arrow 0
  • Generation
    Midgard 4 left arrow 5
  • DirectX Version
    11 left arrow 11
  • Technology
    28nm left arrow 14 nm
  • Release date
    Q4/2015 left arrow Q4/2015
Hardware codec support

This section details the built-in codecs used for encoding and decoding media content, which significantly enhance processing speed and efficiency.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    Decode left arrow No
  • h264
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode
  • VP9
    No left arrow Decode
  • VP8
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • AVC
    No left arrow No
  • VC-1
    No left arrow Decode
  • JPEG
    Decode / Encode left arrow Decode
Memory specs & PCI

Overview of the types and quantities of RAM supported by Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 and HiSilicon Kirin 655. The supported memory frequencies may vary depending on the motherboard configuration.

  • Memory type
    LPDDR3-933 left arrow LPDDR3-933
  • ECC
    No left arrow No
  • Memory channels
    2 left arrow 2
Encryption
  • AES-NI
    No left arrow No
Thermal Management

Analyze the TDP (Thermal Design Power) requirements of HiSilicon Kirin 655 and Qualcomm Snapdragon 650 to make an informed decision on the appropriate cooling system. Remember that TDP refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.

Technologies and extensions

Information on architecture, interfaces, and additional instructions supported by HiSilicon Kirin 655 and Qualcomm Snapdragon 650, including virtual machine technologies and fabrication processes.

  • Instruction set (ISA)
    ARMv8-A64 (64 bit) left arrow ARMv8-A64 (64 bit)
  • Virtualization
    None left arrow None
  • Architecture
    Cortex-A53 / Cortex-A53 left arrow Cortex-A72 / Cortex-A53
  • Technology
    16 nm left arrow 28 nm
  • Socket
    N/A left arrow N/A
  • Release date
    Q2/2016 left arrow Q1/2016
  • Part Number
    -- left arrow MSM8956

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

By analyzing the results from various benchmarks, you can gain a clearer understanding of the performance differences between HiSilicon Kirin 655 and Qualcomm Snapdragon 650.

Compare the synthetic benchmark scores and make an informed decision on the best processor for your needs!

Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
Geekbench 5 SC is a popular cross-platform performance test for desktop or mobile processors that uses system memory intensively
168
HiSilicon Kirin 655
248
Qualcomm Snapdragon 650
Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
Geekbench 5 MC is a popular cross-platform performance test for desktop or mobile processors that uses system memory intensively
794
HiSilicon Kirin 655
803
Qualcomm Snapdragon 650
iGPU - FP32 Performance (Single-precision GFLOPS)
The performance of the iGPU - the internal GPU in games
41
HiSilicon Kirin 655
154
Qualcomm Snapdragon 650

Latest comparisons