AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 1600
Intel Xeon Gold 5215M
Select video card 1
Select video card 2

AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 1600 vs Intel Xeon Gold 5215M. Specifications, performance, tests

Overall score
star star star star star
Released
Q3/2017
AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 1600
AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 1600
Released
Q2/2019
Overall score
star star star star star
Intel Xeon Gold 5215M
Intel Xeon Gold 5215M

Compare AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 1600 VS Intel Xeon Gold 5215M. Which processor delivers superior performance?

In this detailed comparison, we evaluate the specifications and benchmarks of both processors to determine the best choice for your needs. We analyze their core counts, maximum frequencies, and power consumption.

AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 1600 boasts a maximum frequency of 3.20 GHz GHz. 6 cores that enhance multitasking capabilities.With a power consumption of 95 W W, it ensures efficient performance.Released in Q3/2017, it incorporates the latest technology for optimal efficiency.

Intel Xeon Gold 5215M features a maximum frequency of 2.50 GHz GHz. 10 cores designed for high-performance tasks.Its power consumption is 85 W W, providing a balance of power and efficiency.Launched in Q2/2019, it is built to handle demanding applications.

Differences

  • Place in the overall ranking

    (based on several benchmarks)

    529 left arrow score
  • Higher clock speed

    Around 22% better clock speed

    3.20 GHz left arrow 2.50 GHz
  • Higher turbo clock speed

    Around 6% better overclocked clock speed

    3.60 GHz left arrow 3.40 GHz

Positions in all rankings

Common positions AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 1600 CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

  • Cinebench R23 (Single-Core)
    332 place
  • Cinebench R23 (Multi-Core)
    239 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Single-Core)
    468 place
  • Cinebench R15 (Multi-Core)
    287 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    654 place
  • Geekbench 5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    520 place
  • Monero Hashrate kH/s
    73 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Single-Core)
    197 place
  • Geekbench 3, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    170 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Single-Core)
    78 place
  • Cinebench R11.5, 64bit (Multi-Core)
    134 place
  • Estimated results for PassMark CPU Mark
    456 place
  • More number of cores

    About 1.67 times more cores

    10 left arrow 6
  • Performance per watt

    About 0.89 times less performance per watt

    85 W left arrow 95 W

Positions in all rankings

Common positions Intel Xeon Gold 5215M CPU in popular benchmarks, for comparison with other models.

No data

Specifications

Technical data
AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 1600 AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 1600
Intel Xeon Gold 5215M Intel Xeon Gold 5215M
CPU family and group

Comprehensive background on the processors being compared, detailing their series, generation, and targeted market segment.

  • Segment
    Desktop / Server left arrow Desktop / Server
  • Family
    AMD Ryzen left arrow Intel Xeon Gold
  • Generation
    1 left arrow 2
  • CPU group
    AMD Ryzen 1000 left arrow Intel Xeon Gold 5200/6200
CPU Technical specs

Essential parameters including the number of cores, threads, base and turbo frequencies, and cache size. These metrics provide insight into the processor’s speed—higher values generally indicate better performance.

  • Frequency
    3.20 GHz left arrow 2.50 GHz
  • CPU Cores
    6 left arrow 10
  • Turbo (1 Core)
    3.60 GHz left arrow 3.40 GHz
  • CPU Threads
    12 left arrow 20
  • Hyperthreading
    Yes left arrow Yes
  • Overclocking
    Yes left arrow No
  • Core architecture
    normal left arrow normal
IGPU

The integrated graphics (iGPU) do not influence the CPU performance significantly; they serve as a substitute for a dedicated graphics card in the absence of one or are utilized in mobile devices.

  • GPU name
    no iGPU left arrow no iGPU
  • GPU (Turbo)
    No turbo left arrow No turbo
Hardware codec support

This section details the built-in codecs used for encoding and decoding media content, which significantly enhance processing speed and efficiency.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    No left arrow No
  • h264
    No left arrow No
  • VP9
    No left arrow No
  • VP8
    No left arrow No
  • AV1
    No left arrow No
  • AVC
    No left arrow No
  • VC-1
    No left arrow No
  • JPEG
    No left arrow No
Memory specs & PCI

Overview of the types and quantities of RAM supported by Intel Xeon Gold 5215M and AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 1600. The supported memory frequencies may vary depending on the motherboard configuration.

  • Memory type
    DDR4-2666 left arrow DDR4-2666
  • ECC
    Yes left arrow Yes
  • Memory channels
    2 left arrow 6
  • PCIe version
    3.0 left arrow 3.0
  • PCIe lanes
    20 left arrow 48
Encryption
  • AES-NI
    Yes left arrow Yes
Thermal Management

Analyze the TDP (Thermal Design Power) requirements of AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 1600 and Intel Xeon Gold 5215M to make an informed decision on the appropriate cooling system. Remember that TDP refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.

  • TDP (PL1)
    95 W left arrow 85 W
  • Tjunction max.
    95 °C left arrow --
Technologies and extensions

Information on architecture, interfaces, and additional instructions supported by AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 1600 and Intel Xeon Gold 5215M, including virtual machine technologies and fabrication processes.

  • Instruction set (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • Virtualization
    AMD-V, SVM left arrow VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d
  • ISA extensions
    SSE4a, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, FMA3 left arrow SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512
  • L3-Cache
    16.00 MB left arrow 13.75 MB
  • Architecture
    Summit Ridge (Zen) left arrow Cascade Lake
  • Technology
    14 nm left arrow 14 nm
  • Socket
    AM4 left arrow LGA 3647
  • Release date
    Q3/2017 left arrow Q2/2019

Benchmarks

Performance tests CPUs

By analyzing the results from various benchmarks, you can gain a clearer understanding of the performance differences between AMD Ryzen 5 Pro 1600 and Intel Xeon Gold 5215M.

Compare the synthetic benchmark scores and make an informed decision on the best processor for your needs!

Latest comparisons