Intel Xeon w5-3425
AMD EPYC 9754
Videokarte 1 auswählen
Videokarte 2 auswählen

Intel Xeon w5-3425 gegen AMD EPYC 9754. Spezifikationen, Leistung, Tests

Gesamtnote
star star star star star
Freigegeben
Q1/2023
Intel Xeon w5-3425
Intel Xeon w5-3425
Freigegeben
Q2/2023
Gesamtnote
star star star star star
AMD EPYC 9754
AMD EPYC 9754

Vergleichen Sie Intel Xeon w5-3425 VS AMD EPYC 9754. Which processor delivers superior performance?

In this detailed comparison, we evaluate the specifications and benchmarks of both processors to determine the best choice for your needs. We analyze their core counts, maximum frequencies, and power consumption.

Intel Xeon w5-3425 boasts a maximum frequency of 3.20 GHz GHz. 12 / 24 cores that enhance multitasking capabilities.With a power consumption of 270 W W, it ensures efficient performance.Freigegeben in Q1/2023, it incorporates the latest technology for optimal efficiency.

AMD EPYC 9754 features a maximum frequency of 2.25 GHz GHz. 128 / 256 cores designed for high-performance tasks.Its power consumption is 360 W W, providing a balance of power and efficiency.Launched in Q2/2023, it is built to handle demanding applications.

Unterschiede

Intel Xeon w5-3425 Gründe für die Berücksichtigung
Intel Xeon w5-3425
Einen Fehler melden
  • Höhere Taktfrequenz

    Rund um 30% höhere taktfrequenz

    3.20 GHz left arrow 2.25 GHz
  • Höhere Turbotaktfrequenz

    Rund um 33% bessere übertaktete taktrate

    4.60 GHz left arrow 3.10 GHz
  • Leistung pro Watt

    weniger Wärmeentwicklung durch den Prozessor, W.

    270 W left arrow 360 W

Positionen in allen Ranglisten

Gemeinsame Standpunkte Intel Xeon w5-3425 CPU in gängigen Benchmarks, zum Vergleich mit anderen Modellen.

No data
AMD EPYC 9754 Gründe für die Berücksichtigung
AMD EPYC 9754
Einen Fehler melden
  • Größere Anzahl von Kernen

    About 10.67 Mehr Kerne

    128 left arrow 12

Positionen in allen Ranglisten

Gemeinsame Standpunkte AMD EPYC 9754 CPU in gängigen Benchmarks, zum Vergleich mit anderen Modellen.

No data

Specifications

Technische Daten
Intel Xeon w5-3425 Intel Xeon w5-3425
AMD EPYC 9754 AMD EPYC 9754
CPU-Familie und Gruppe

Comprehensive background on the processors being compared, detailing their series, generation, and targeted market segment.

  • Serie
    Intel Xeon W left arrow AMD EPYC
  • CPU Gruppe
    Intel Xeon W-3400 left arrow AMD EPYC 9004
  • Segment
    Desktop / Server left arrow Desktop / Server
  • Generation
    12 left arrow 4
  • Vergangenes Modell
    Intel Xeon W-3225 left arrow --
Technische Daten der CPU

Essential parameters including the number of cores, threads, base and turbo frequencies, and cache size. These metrics provide insight into the processor’s speed—higher values generally indicate better performance.

  • CPU Cores / Threads
    12 / 24 left arrow 128 / 256
  • Zentrale Architektur
    normal left arrow normal
  • Kerne
    12x left arrow 128x Zen 4c
  • Hyperthreading / SMT
    Ja left arrow Ja
  • Übertaktung
    Nein left arrow Nein
  • Frequenz
    3.20 GHz left arrow 2.25 GHz
  • Turbo Frequency (1 Core)
    4.60 GHz left arrow 3.10 GHz
IGPU

The integrated graphics (iGPU) do not influence the CPU performance significantly; they serve as a substitute for a dedicated graphics card in the absence of one or are utilized in mobile devices.

  • GPU-Name
    keine iGPU left arrow keine iGPU
  • GPU (Turbo)
    kein Turbo left arrow kein Turbo
Hardware Codec Unterstützung

This section details the built-in codecs used for encoding and decoding media content, which significantly enhance processing speed and efficiency.

  • h265 / HEVC (8 bit)
    Nein left arrow Nein
  • h265 / HEVC (10 bit)
    Nein left arrow Nein
  • h264
    Nein left arrow Nein
  • VP8
    Nein left arrow Nein
  • VP9
    Nein left arrow Nein
  • AV1
    Nein left arrow Nein
  • AVC
    Nein left arrow Nein
  • VC-1
    Nein left arrow Nein
  • JPEG
    Nein left arrow Nein
Speicherspezifikationen & PCI

Overview of the types and quantities of RAM supported by AMD EPYC 9754 und Intel Xeon w5-3425. The supported memory frequencies may vary depending on the motherboard configuration.

  • Speicher Typ
    DDR5-4800 left arrow DDR5-4800
  • Max. Speicher
    4096 GB left arrow 6144 GB
  • Speicherkanäle
    8 (Octa Channel) left arrow 12
  • Bandwidth
    307.2 GB/s left arrow 461.0 GB/s
  • ECC
    Ja left arrow Ja
  • PCIe
    5.0 x 112 left arrow 5.0 x 128
  • AES-NI
    Ja left arrow Ja
Energieverbrauch

Analyze the TDP (Thermal Design Power) requirements of Intel Xeon w5-3425 und AMD EPYC 9754 to make an informed decision on the appropriate cooling system. Remember that TDP refers to thermal watts, not electrical watts.

  • TDP (PL1 / PBP)
    270 W left arrow 360 W
  • TDP up
    324 W left arrow 400 W
  • TDP down
    -- left arrow 320 W
  • Maximale Temperatur
    103 °C left arrow 100 °C
Technologien und Erweiterungen

Information on architecture, interfaces, and additional instructions supported by Intel Xeon w5-3425 und AMD EPYC 9754, including virtual machine technologies and fabrication processes.

  • technisches verfahren
    10 nm left arrow 5 nm
  • Chip design
    Monolithic left arrow Chiplet
  • Steckdose
    LGA 4677 left arrow SP5
  • L3-Cache
    30.00 MB left arrow 256.00 MB
  • Architektur
    Sapphire Rapids-WS left arrow Bergamo (Zen 4c)
  • Operating systems
    Windows 11, Windows Server, Linux left arrow Windows Server 2022, Linux, Windows 11
  • Virtualisierung
    VT-x, VT-x EPT, VT-d, VT-rp, vPro Enterprise left arrow AMD-V, SVM
  • Befehlssatz (ISA)
    x86-64 (64 bit) left arrow x86-64 (64 bit)
  • ISA-Erweiterungen
    SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512, AMX left arrow SSE4.2, AVX2, AVX-512, BFLOAT16, VNNI
  • Datum der Veröffentlichung
    Q1/2023 left arrow Q2/2023
  • Release price
    1189 $ left arrow 11900 $
  • Spezifikation
    Technical data sheet left arrow Technical data sheet

Benchmarks (tests)

Leistungstests CPUs

By analyzing the results from various benchmarks, you can gain a clearer understanding of the performance differences between Intel Xeon w5-3425 und AMD EPYC 9754.

Compare the synthetic benchmark scores and make an informed decision on the best processor for your needs!

Letzte Vergleiche